There’s a plethora of stories coming out that are framing climate change as something no one was talking about until recently. Pardon my language, but that’s some fucked up revisionism.
Maybe folks in power want to absolve themselves from their inaction, or media outlets feel guilty for not giving climate change the coverage it deserved for decades, but somehow we blew right past “this is what we’ve been warning about” to “if only we’d been warned!?”
Setting aside the fact that we’ve known about the physics of CO2 warming the planet since > Eunice Foote (1865), Arrhenius (1896) et al, a US presidents’ advisory council raised concerns about the greenhouse effect in 1965. Wally Broecker used the term “global warming” in 1975.
The IPCC formed in 1988; its first Report was released in 1990. In the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, developed countries pledged to hold emissions to 1990 levels. In 1997, nations signed the Kyoto Protocol, pledging a 5% reduction in emissions by 2012. The US Senate refused to ratify.
James Hansen’s famous testimony to Congress was in 1988. Al Gore’s Earth in the Balance came out in 1992. @MichaelEMann’s famous “hockey stick” graph was published in 1998.

This was all before I finished high school. And those are just some of the highlights.
There have been popular books and articles on climate change published regularly since the early 2000’s, at least. The Day After Tomorrow (which significantly raised public awareness about climate change) came out in 2004. An Inconvenient Truth was released in 2006.
(Correction: Foote’s paper was delivered in 1856, not 1865.)

Decades of scientific reports warned of fires, sea level rise, drought, floods, heat waves, new diseases and pests, extinction, crop losses.
I don’t blame average folks for not knowing about climate change.

But the people who were supposed to do something about it knew. They thought they’d be fine, or they chose short-term power and profit. Or they believed fossil fuel industry lies, while taking fossil fuel money.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Jacquelyn Gill

Dr. Jacquelyn Gill Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JacquelynGill

28 Apr
Apparently I'm an "overpopulation denier" for pointing out the fact that consumption is the real problem, and that population anxiety is deeply rooted in racism and can lead to ecofascism. It's amazing how much people will cling to harmful ideas even when the data say otherwise.
For folk who would like to learn more, some links to help:

vox.com/energy-and-env…
Read 7 tweets
26 Apr
I really liked @EricHolthaus newsletter today, which connected me with this important essay I missed: "How can we make sure that climate anxiety is harnessed for climate justice?"
scientificamerican.com/article/the-un…
And also to @brittwray's Gen Dread Substack, which includes this follow-up from the author:
gendread.substack.com/p/sarah-jaquet…
(It looks like @sjaquetteray is on Twitter, too -- tagging her here so you can follow her, as well!)
Read 4 tweets
19 Apr
I'm excited to share our new paper, led by @erleellis. By combining global maps of human populations and land use, we found that ~75% of terrestrial nature has been shaped by people for at least 12,000.

pnas.org/content/118/17…
Our main take-home points: 1) "With rare exceptions, current biodiversity losses are caused not by human conversion or degradation of untouched ecosystems, but rather by the appropriation, colonization, and intensification of use in lands inhabited and used by prior societies."
2) "Global land use history confirms that empowering the environmental stewardship of Indigenous peoples and local communities will be critical to conserving biodiversity across the planet."
Read 6 tweets
11 Mar
@ClimateBen This is incredibly irresponsible and harmful. Tacking “BREAKING” onto an unattributed statement is bad enough, but you’re also misrepresenting Gavin—he never said that. You need to delete this. What you’re doing is wrong, Ben, and I think you know better.
@ClimateBen To support your first tweet, you link to two papers about impacts to support your statement, and you misrepresent and exaggerate the findings of both (neither of which Gavin was involved in). Most people won’t actually read the articles, let alone the papers you posted.
@ClimateBen The climate crisis needs no exaggeration to drive action. But threads like this make it harder and harder for scientists to debunk doomist narratives, and as a result, we’re getting attacked by people citing our own work on climate change, who accuse us of downplaying the crisis.
Read 9 tweets
10 Mar
We're starting! Oooh, we start with a love triangle!

Three goats leave, two goats come home.

#SureFineWhatever
Welp, that was a super short love triangle.

#SureFineWhatever
Mulder is in his element. He's so excited he's got his sunflower seeds out. He can barely contain himself.

#SureFineWhatever
Read 27 tweets
8 Mar
🌿It's @OurWarmRegards episode day! 🌿We talked about the power of fiction with @EricHolthaus and Kim Stanley Robinson, who each wrote recent books that provide roadmaps towards a better climate future: warmregardspodcast.com/episodes/build…
This was such a fun conversation, not only because we got to have Eric back on the show (as the founder of Warm Regards). Eric took a break from the podcast to work on The Future Earth, and it was really nice to be able to close the loop with a conversation about his book.
I also got to talk with one of my favorite authors about one of my favorite moments in one of my favorite books, and that's just not something one gets to do very often, if ever.

We hope you enjoy this first episode in our two-part finale, and we'd love to hear what you think.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(