Vaccines in UK are not mandatory. There is an exemption on evidence of medical reasons and the Supreme Court recognises at common law that denial of free and informed consent is a self certified medical reason. See Montgomery v Lanarkshire [2015] UKSC 11 supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uks…
In R Wilkinson v Broadmoor : [2001] EWCA Civ 1545, Lady Justice Hale, Supreme Court President, confirmed that forced medical procedure without informed consent "may be sued in the ordinary way for the (common law) tort of battery". bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/…
In the judgement it was held that acting under statutory authority provides no defence, therefore the Employer will be guilty of coercion on the threat of battery with regards to unlawful dismissal if express evidence of denial of informed consent are unlawfully rejected.
This will result in a breach of contract and also a Tort that can be sued. The above is why mask "mandate" exemptions were self certified. It is unlawful for Doctors to interfere with the process of free and informed consent. Informed consent is defined in Montgomery as follows:
1. That the patient is given sufficient information – to allow individuals to make choices that will affect their health and well being on proper information.
2. Sufficient information means informing the patient of the availability of other treatments (and forms of testing).
3. That the patient is informed of the material risks of taking the medical intervention and the material risks of declining it.
If consent is given but the Patient subsequently proves that information provided at the time breached the above common law test of informed consent, the Tort of battery is committed and the medication is unlawful.
The High Court has found children incapable of providing Gillick Competency for experimental medicines with unknown long term effects. Schools therefore risk being sued for battery if ignoring Parental preferences. See Bell v Tavistock [2020] EWHC 3274
judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl…
These principles are discussed without reference to case law on this important NHS page on Free and Informed Consent and Gillick Competency. nhs.uk/conditions/con…
The fundamental common law right to free and informed consent, based on the ancient Tort of battery (tresspass to the person), are valid in all 16 Commonwealth Realms and both the Republic of Ireland and USA, where English common law is retained as a body of law.
In Ireland, evidence that English common law rights are retained can be found in the Statute Revision Act (2007) which retained Magna Carta and most of the English Bill of Rights (1688) and much, much more. irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2007/act/2…
In USA, English common law rights are retained by the 9th Amendment of the Constitution "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.", hence why US courts refer to them. constitution.congress.gov/constitution/a…
Law that provides rights sit above normal laws in English law and provide lawful excuse to statutory obligations with this acknowledged by courts. see Art.29 Magna Carta (1297), which states: "we will not deny or defer to any man either Justice or Right." legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1cc1929…
Another case to read is Burton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2017] EWCA Civ 62 regarding Doctor's obligation to provide information to inform consent. bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/…
Happy for Solicitors to DM and work with me or folk who want to work on template letters to send out.
For those not familiar with our organisation, here are the articles we have written on Covid. westonaprice.org/coronavirus/
Covid passports also recognise self certified free and informed consent.
"If you have a medical reason which means you cannot be vaccinated or tested, you may be asked to self-declare this medical exemption."
gov.uk/guidance/nhs-c…
Also see Art.IV Acts of Union (1706-7)
"That all the Subjects of the UK of GB shall from & after the Union have full freedom & Intercourse of Trade & Navigation to & from any port or place within the said UK & the Dominions"
legislation.gov.uk/aep/Ann/6/11/p…
For our friends in New Zealand, you also have these common law rights, but additionally, Art.11 of your 1990 Bill of Rights states:
"Everyone has the right to refuse to undergo any medical treatment."
legislation.govt.nz/act/public/199…
🚨Covid Pass Exemptions🚨
"customers may declare a medical exemption directly with you. You & your staff SHOULD NOT ask for evidence of the exemption."
You must "comply with all the relevant legal obligations, Equalities Act & Guidance (+ Informed consent) nhsx.nhs.uk/covid-19-respo…
People have asked for this to be put into simple English. UK law basically states, your body, your choice. These various legal authorities and government guidance provide fancy ways of stating what we know to be true, that we are free to choose what we put in our bodies.
To support our work in the UK and access our video library of previous natural health conferences, visit our website, where you can subscribe for £2 a month.
We also have plenty of free videos for those not familiar with our unique approach to health : westonaprice.london
Seasonal illness is caused primarily by Vitamin D deficiency, not contagion. It is caused by low fat diets & industrial, sun deplete farming (Vitamin D is fat soluble) & statin induced cholesterol deficiency because Vitamin D is produced from cholesterol. westonaprice.org/health-topics/…
Put medical preferences on your last will and testament citing SS v Richmond [2021] EWCOP 31.
Informed consent is has an early authority in USA that does not seem to have been overturned.
Cardozo J in Schloendorff v Society of New York Hospital 105 NE 92 (NY, 1914) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schloendo…
Justice Benjamin Cardozo wrote in the Court's opinion as follows:
"Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body; and a surgeon who performs an operation without his patient's consent commits an assault for which he is liable in damages. This is true except in cases of emergency,,,
,,where the patient is unconscious and where it is necessary to operate before consent can be obtained."
The court found the charitable hospital had immunity, that the litigant should have sued the surgeon to obtain relief, but that principle was overturned in Bing v. Thunig 1957
In Chester v Afshar [2004] UKHL 41 The House of Lords decided that a doctor's failure to fully inform a patient of all surgery risks vitiates the need to show that harm would have been caused by the failure to inform.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chester_v…
Sidaway vs Bethlem [1985] AC 871
"A mentally competent patient has an absolute right to refuse to consent to medical treatment for any reason, rational or irrational, or for no reason at all, even where that decision may lead to his or her own death."
bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/…
Missouri vs McNeely, 569 US _ (2013) – caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-cou…
“…this Court has never retreated from its recognition that any compelled intrusion into the human body implicates significant, constitutionally protected privacy interests.”
🚨Care Home Vaccine Mandate Letter🚨
Our letter is now available. It explains in detail how the mandate is a hoax, what your rights are and how to assert them.
It also explains to care home operators their due diligence and all reasonable steps defence.
🚨Care Home Vaccine Mandate Letter🚨
Our letter is now available. It explains in detail how the mandate is a hoax, what your rights are and how to assert them.
It also explains to care home operators their due diligence and all reasonable steps defence.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Weston A. Price Foundation, London Chapter

Weston A. Price Foundation, London Chapter Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @WAPFLondon

May 3
The UK Health Security Agency is changing the vaccine schedule to vaccinate your children more. 🧵
gov.uk/government/pub…
Introduction of a New 18-Month Vaccination Appointment initially to deliver:
Haemophilus influenzae type b and meningococcal group C vaccines. Strategies need to be developed now for Parents who object to their children being vaccinated at this stage.
Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine

Toxic ingredients include:
Hib polysaccharide (polyribosylribitol phosphate, PRP) conjugated to tetanus toxoid
Diphtheria toxoid
Tetanus toxoid
Pertussis antigens (pertussis toxoid, filamentous haemagglutinin, pertactin)
Inactivated poliovirus (types 1, 2, 3)
Hepatitis B surface antigen
Aluminum hydroxide
Aluminum phosphate
Lactose (stabilizer in Hib component)
Medium 199 (containing amino acids, vitamins, and minerals)
Formaldehyde (trace, <0.05 mg per dose)
Neomycin (trace)
Polymyxin B (trace)

These vaccines are to prevent 33–47 deaths annually purportedly caused by the disease but these deaths concentrate with co-morbities:
Preterm infants (<37 weeks) or those with low birth weight (<2,500 g) accounting for 10–20% of Hib deaths in pre-vaccine studies.
Immunodeficiency accounts for 5–10% of fatal cases.
Chronic Respiratory Conditions account for 5–10% in fatal cases, particularly for pneumonia.
Neurological or Developmental Disorders account for 5–15% of fatalities.
10–20% of deaths are linked to delayed treatment, e.g. developing sepsis.
10-20% linked with poverty.

Risks from Infanrix hexa (6-in-1, Primary Series at 2, 3, 4 Months)
Common (Mild): Redness, swelling, or pain at injection site (25–50%): 140,625–281,250 children
Low-grade fever (<38°C, 10–30%): 56,250–168,750 children
Irritability, crying, or drowsiness (10–30%): 56,250–168,750 children
Loss of appetite (temporary, 10–20%): 56,250–112,500 children

Rare:
High fever (>39°C, 1–5%): 5,625–28,125 children
Severe allergic reaction (anaphylaxis, <1 per 100,000 doses): <6 children (based on 3 doses per child, ~1.69 million doses total)
Febrile seizures (<1 per 10,000 doses): <169 children (based on total doses)
Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode (HHE, <1 per 10,000 doses): <169 children

Menitorix (Hib/MenC, Booster at 12 Months)
Common (Mild): Redness, swelling, or pain at injection site (10–20%): 56,250–112,500 children
Low-grade fever (<10%): <56,250 children
Irritability or drowsiness (5–10%): 28,125–56,250 children

Rare: High fever (<1%): <5,625 children
Severe allergic reaction (anaphylaxis, <1 per 100,000 doses): <6 children
Febrile seizures (<1 per 10,000 doses): <56 children
Rash or itching (<1%): <5,625 children

Contraindications
Avoid in children with known severe allergy to vaccine components (e.g., tetanus toxoid, neomycin) or history of anaphylaxis to a previous dose.
Infanrix hexa: Avoid in infants with progressive neurological conditions until stabilized.
Read 12 tweets
Apr 27
It is a summary criminal offence to carry out solar dimming exercises involving the projecting of aerosolised particles from an aircraft without consent from the Civil Aviation Authority under Art 89 The Air Navigation Order 2016.
Conditions can be imposed to address environmental concerns, such as requiring assessments or limiting substances.
legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2016/765/…
This summary offence is set out in Article 265 of the Air Navigation Order 2016 incurring a fine not exceeding level 4 on the standard scale, currently £2,500, on summary conviction.
legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2016/765/…
FOI request to the Civil Aviation Authority regarding consents and prosecutions for solar dimming.
whatdotheyknow.com/request/solar_…Image
The Civil Aviation Authority has powers to inspect and ground aircraft for violations of Article 89 for unauthorised solar dimming under Article 257 of the Air Navigation Order 2016.
legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2016/765/…
Read 5 tweets
Mar 15
What and who is it that is systematically dismantling western civilisation? How long has this been going on?

Carl Marx 1848:
"And old England will only be overthrown in a world war, which alone would give the Chartist Party, the organised English Labour Party, the possibility of a successful rising against its stupendous oppressor. The Chartists at the head of the English Government – only from this moment would the social revolution emerge from the realm of Utopia and enter the sphere of reality..."
marxists.org/archive/marx/w…

Is it a coincidence that the UN's Charter, which reverses the principles of individual rights in the British and American constitutions was signed precisely 100yrs later following a World War, goaded by Labour Prime Clement Attlee?

Art.29 UDHR (1948) "These rights & freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes & principles of the UN." un.org/en/about-us/un… maliciously counters Art.29 Magna Carta (1297) "we will not deny or defer to any man either Justice or Right". legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1cc1929…

and

Citing Sir Edward Coke, The US Supreme Court stated in 1855 that The words, "due process of law" (in the 5th & 14th Amendments), were undoubtedly intended to convey the same meaning as the words, "by the law of the land", in Art.29 Magna Carta 1297. caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-cou…

Marx's 1848 plea then translates directly into this:

WHO, in “Addressing ethical issues in pandemic influenza planning” 2008 p36 discuss “Valid limitations on human rights”. Claiming ICCPR 1976, Art.4.1 allows nations to “suspend most other civil & political rights” during a P(l)andemic.
"Thus, compulsory measures such as vaccination, treatment, or isolation would be permitted only if necessary to protect the public’s health."
apps.who.int/iris/handle/10…

What do they have next in store? Why would organised Labour want to destroy Western civilisation? Who is really behind this government.
Also in Art 29 of the UDHR, setting out the collective (communist/socialist) New World (dis)Order, they explain in no uncertain terms that whereas the previous clauses recognised individual rights, that these would henceforth be deemed unthinkable outside of the collective thereby negating entirely any principle of individual rights. What now has rights and domination over all individuals are the purposes and principles of the United Nations.
un.org/en/about-us/un…Image
With 29(3) being the most egregious element that inevitably leads to the arbitrary suspension of most civil and political rights, i.e. lockdown lets take a look at it's numerology.

29 / 3 = 9.666r combining both the number of the beast and Dante's 9 circles of hell. How fitting?
Read 4 tweets
Mar 11
🧵 Angela Rayner's land grab at less than market value with the state stealing land is a violation of Art.29 of the 1297 Magna Carta (due process of law).

Arguably compulsory purchase, period, without conviction of a crime, is contrary to the Great Charter.

"NO freeman shall be taken or imprisoned, or BE DESSEISED OF HIS FREEHOLD, or liberties, or free customs, or be outlawed, or exiled, or any other wise destroyed; nor will we not pass upon him, nor condemn him, but by lawful judgment of his peers, or by the law of the land. We will sell to no man, we will not deny or defer to any man either justice or right.”
legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1cc1929…Image
Also contrary to Art.II of the Liberty of the Subject Act 1354

That no Man of what Estate or Condition that he be, SHALLE BE PUT OUT OF LAND OR TENEMENT, nor taken, nor imprisoned, NOR DISINHERITED nor put to Death, without being brought in Answer by due Process of the Law.
legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw3/28/3

Inheritance tax is also arguably declared outlawed by this later re-issuance of Magna Carta also, if it can be considered a partial disinheritance.
Citing Sir Edward Coke, The US Supreme Court stated in 1855 that The words, "due process of law" (in the 5th & 14th Amendments), were undoubtedly intended to convey the same meaning as the words, "by the law of the land", in Art.29 Magna Carta 1297. caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-cou…Image
Read 5 tweets
Mar 8
🦷🪥🧵

The key teaching of the Weston A. Price Foundation is that tooth decay is caused not by a deficit of fluoride or brushing, nor by bacteria feeding on sugar.
Tooth enamel re-mineralises via saliva which must have adequate minerals and vitamins A, D & K2.
Refined sugar causes mineral depletion because of the amount of minerals require to metabolise it, which are stripped out of refined carbs.
Tooth decay is caused by the WHO's (and the government's) low fat, high carb dietary guidelines and by poverty induced malnutrition.
No amount of corporate partnering with Colgate will resolve malnutrition induced tooth decay and no amount of fluoridation of our water with toxic chemicals will safe our teeth.
When Dr. Price analysed the foods used by isolated indigenous peoples he found they provided at least 4 times the calcium and other minerals, and at least 10 times the fat-soluble vitamins from animal foods such as butter, fish eggs, shellfish & organ meats. westonaprice.org/health-topics/…Image
Our only video of Dr Weston A. Price. Here, in New Zealand he pleads with people to have a nutrient dense diet and to learn from the accumulated wisdom of, "primitive" people. vimeo.com/197586148
Read 6 tweets
Dec 6, 2024
A cautionary tale relevant to Bovaur, we reported back in the year 2000 that the mandating of organophosphate treatment of cows to eradicate warble flies was the real cause of BSE (Mad Cow Disease).
The late great Mark Purdey (Author of Animal Pharm) fought for organic farmers to be exempt, he won and no organic farm got BSE but they blamed and banned blood and bone meal and used the fabricated crisis to force the feeding of livestock with endocrine disrupting soy meal.
For all of our articles on the topic visit: westonaprice.org/health-topics-…
Animal Pharm: westonaprice.org/health-topics/…
Pesticides and You News from Beyond Pesticides / National Coalition Against the Misuse of Pesticides (NCAMP)

The Pesticide Link to Mad Cow Disease:
beyondpesticides.org/assets/media/d…
Similarly, Polio is not caused by a contagious virus. It reduced after DDT was banned, not as a result of vaccination. The focus should be pesticide toxicity, not contagion.

"Pesticides and Polio: A Critique of Scientific Literature" westonaprice.org/health-topics/…
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(