@jimmcmanusph your conflation of schools being able to ask child with measles to isolate with any real power for them to so alongside the reckless claim that the vaccinated can come to school in @hertscc area is unlawful because there are no such laws requiring unvaccinated… https://t.co/Wn7dvId50otwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Also, the letter is negligent because it encourages a medical treatment without discharging your common law duty to take reasonable care to ensure that the patient is aware of any material risks involved in any recommended treatment.
All you have done is disclosed a bias view of… https://t.co/v3KRk2iKdUtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…

The Covid dance routines were Soviet Socialist Realism.
This thread sets out the similarities and contrasts with the individualistic theatrics of Meyerhold, who Stalin had executed.
In the West, the capitalist public were excluded, only socialist health care workers could dance.

https://twitter.com/ooana/status/1388733145776857088

The plot excludes spontaneous (selfish) Soviet enemies without class consciousness (You the locked down audience) vs 💉'd Soviet hero's dancing in PPE who through compliant class consciousness and self sacrifice transcend the lockdown to joyfully dance.

The threat of a biosecurity state was made clear by @WHO from at least 2008. Here we were warning about lockdown in 2011 via @economicvoice

"COULD SUPER-FLU BE CAUSED BY THIS YEAR’S FLU VACCINE" Posted by Philip Ridley | Nov 4, 2011
economicvoice.com/could-super-fl… #Brexit from @WHO.
WHO, in “Addressing ethical issues in pandemic influenza planning” 2008 p36 discuss the absurd idea of “Valid limitations on human rights”. They claim ICCPR 1976, Art.4.1 allows nations to “suspend most other civil & political rights”
apps.who.int/iris/handle/10…

@goddeketal Our first red flag was in 2008.
WHO, in “Addressing ethical issues in pandemic influenza planning” 2008 p36 discuss “Valid limitations on human rights”. They claim ICCPR 1976, Art.4.1 allows nations to “suspend most other civil & political rights”
apps.who.int/iris/handle/10… @goddeketal People should have been freaking out since the 1976 ICCPR Treaty. See Art.4.1

Translation:
"We are meeting to discuss how to come up with fake crisis to fear the people into implementing global socialism and sacrificing to us their freedom, rights and liberty and way of life to a global government for and by the UN and their corporate stakeholders."

https://twitter.com/mpr_nano/status/1621176627345461249

@UN's @ClubOfRome's 1st Global Revolution "searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, threat of global warming, water shortages, famine (Plandemics?) & the like would fit the bill" "The real enemy, is humanity itself.” en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_First…

We have asked @BritishArmy via FOI for any Parliamentary Consent that they obtained for the domestic deployment of 77th Brigade against the people during the Covid-19 P(l)andemic.
Also setting out the associated constitutional law. whatdotheyknow.com/request/parlia… via @whatdotheyknow We have been tweeting on this issue since August 2020.

https://twitter.com/WAPFLondon/status/1290255853484826624

'‘Plant Based Treaty’ Nutritional Profile'
We have asked @Edinburgh_CC whether they have considered the nutritional implications of removing animal products from schools, hospitals & care homes for vulnerable people.
whatdotheyknow.com/request/plant_… via @WhatDoTheyKnow The Mighty Highlanders, The Weston A. Price Foundation
"The Highlanders’ diet was based first on the raw milk of their herds. During the spring & summer, wild game of all kind. Every part of the animal was used for food, including all the internal organs."
westonaprice.org/health-topics/…

Kanye is missing the elephant in the room. Read Carroll Quigley, Bill Clinton's Georgetown Mentor, Historian for CFR to discover that Roosevelt & yes, Churchill, conspired that WWII would be used to impose the UN & EU. WWI was to form the League of Nations
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carroll_Q… We also got the European Convention on Human Rights, leading to Blair's Human Rights Act that provides public health derogations to so called rights that were used to justify lockdown policies & the fake "right to life" the Supreme Court said created a duty to lock us down.

@Togetherdec @carlheneghan Yes indeed 👏👏 the judicial test to vitiate the tort of clinical negligence is set out in Para.87 of Montgomery v Lanarkshire [2015] UKSC 11 supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uks…
@Togetherdec @carlheneghan But informed consent is not why mandates are unlawful, this is because medical testing or treatment without valid consent causes the tort and crime of battery. See next tweet.

TASK: Contact your GP, ask whether they are insured for civil and criminal liability if they vaccinate or refer you to be vaccinated where valid informed consent cannot be obtained due to you self certifying that you feel coerced. Share with them info in this thread. @NHSuk guidance on consent: "Consent from a patient is needed regardless of the procedure". "For consent to be valid, it must be voluntary and informed, and the person consenting must have the capacity to make the decision." nhs.uk/conditions/con…

Any medical trial in UK such as COVID-19 vaccination & tests on emergency approval must comply with the @medwma's Declaration of Helsinki by virtue of s.1, of Part.2 of Sch.2 of The UK's "Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations (2004)". wma.net/policies-post/… These provide amongst other things at Para.25 to 32 a more exacting measure of valid informed consent, the breach of which causes the treatment to be unlawful battery at common law.
@GOVUK's conduct therefore likely renders most test subjects victims of civil rights violations.

@jacindaardern NZ Bill of Rights (1990) makes your lockdown unlawful.
Anybody enforcing lockdown can be sued for nominal & injunctive relief at Tort for the following civil rights violations. See the link and thread below.
legislation.govt.nz/act/public/199…… 9. Everyone has the right not to be subjected to torture or to cruel, degrading, or disproportionately severe treatment or punishment.
10. Every person has the right not to be subjected to medical or scientific experimentation without that person's consent.

🚨URGENT Care Worker Action Alert🚨
It is about three months until deadline for care worker first vax. Most Unions require 3 months membership to provide legal insurance which can provide more than a million pounds of cover for tribunals.
Join a Union against mandatory vax ASAP. You may not like Unions, but when a member, you can influence them by voting in elections and standing for positions and can opt out of political contributions.

@barnes_law
English courts for time immorial considered medication without consent battery. Informed consent developed from this Tort when courts decided that battery still occured if consent was not informed. Battery & informed consent are inseparable at common law. So it was great to hear you mention informed consent and battery on infowars regarding vaccine passports, but the solution is that the remedy to failure to obtain express informed consent is not to attack the mandate. Instead assert that mandates are no defence against battery.

@SussexUni Bribing students to be vaccinated invalidates informed consent rendering the medication unlawful battery at common law making @SussexUni vulnerable to Tort proceedings with unlimited damages and criminal bribery charges.

https://twitter.com/WAPFLondon/status/1419968605593247760?s=20

@SussexUni Bribery Act 2010 provides four main offences:
1. giving or offering a bribe
2. receiving or requesting a bribe
3. bribing a foreign public official (also known as facilitation payments)
4. negligently failing to prevent a bribe (corporate offence).
gmc-uk.org/registration-a…

Just heard from a Tottenham supporter that following taking our advice, that the club accepted his self certified exemption from Covid Pass, we are winning people. ⚽️🎉 @org_scp Here is our hero.
To quote the Spurs Motto, "to dare is to do".

https://twitter.com/LTMCOMPMK/status/1423957173386850305?s=20

Put medical preferences on your last will and testament citing SS v Richmond [2021] EWCOP 31.

https://twitter.com/WAPFLondon/status/1422190014432223232?s=20

Informed consent is has an early authority in USA that does not seem to have been overturned.
Cardozo J in Schloendorff v Society of New York Hospital 105 NE 92 (NY, 1914) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schloendo…
Justice Benjamin Cardozo wrote in the Court's opinion as follows:

Forced Covid vax to Dementia patient lacking capacity but previously objecting to vaccination found unlawful in SS v Richmond [2021] EWCOP 31 bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCOP…
Reasons below in thread: (1) SS lacked capacity, owing to dementia, to decide whether to take a coronavirus vaccination, but consistently & volubly opposed it.
(2) If she had capacity she should most likely would have refused: previously she had always attended to her medical welfare but resisted vax's.

Vaccines in UK are not mandatory. There is an exemption on evidence of medical reasons and the Supreme Court recognises at common law that denial of free and informed consent is a self certified medical reason. See Montgomery v Lanarkshire [2015] UKSC 11 supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uks… In R Wilkinson v Broadmoor : [2001] EWCA Civ 1545, Lady Justice Hale, Supreme Court President, confirmed that forced medical procedure without informed consent "may be sued in the ordinary way for the (common law) tort of battery". bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/…

@BasedParalegal @amessd_southend @JamesDuddridge This is a fiction, because this statutory instrument doesn't effect the fundamental common law right to free & informed consent. Enacting this law therefore creates a Tort and, exercising your right to free & informed consent provides lawful excuse. Statute & Common law collide. @BasedParalegal @amessd_southend @JamesDuddridge See Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11 and Webster v Burton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2017] EWCA Civ 62.
Also see High Court regarding Informed Consent v experimental treatments that limited Gillick consent in Bell v Tavistock [2020] EWHC 3274 (Admin)

@HouseofCommons @transportgovuk General restrictions on travel are unconstitutional. Art.IV Union with Scotland Act gives "full freedom and Intercourse of Trade and Navigation to and from any port or place within the said United Kingdom and the Dominions" as a "Subjects Right". legislation.gov.uk/aep/Ann/6/11/p… @HouseofCommons @transportgovuk This was restated with Art.IV Union with England Act (1707) legislation.gov.uk/aosp/1707/7/se… and Acts of Union (1800) legislation.gov.uk/aip/Geo3/40/38…. Art.29 Magna Carta (1297) states that no man will be denied their liberties or RIGHTS legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1cc1929…