Vaccines in UK are not mandatory. There is an exemption on evidence of medical reasons and the Supreme Court recognises at common law that denial of free and informed consent is a self certified medical reason. See Montgomery v Lanarkshire [2015] UKSC 11 supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uks…
In R Wilkinson v Broadmoor : [2001] EWCA Civ 1545, Lady Justice Hale, Supreme Court President, confirmed that forced medical procedure without informed consent "may be sued in the ordinary way for the (common law) tort of battery". bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/…
In the judgement it was held that acting under statutory authority provides no defence, therefore the Employer will be guilty of coercion on the threat of battery with regards to unlawful dismissal if express evidence of denial of informed consent are unlawfully rejected.
This will result in a breach of contract and also a Tort that can be sued. The above is why mask "mandate" exemptions were self certified. It is unlawful for Doctors to interfere with the process of free and informed consent. Informed consent is defined in Montgomery as follows:
1. That the patient is given sufficient information – to allow individuals to make choices that will affect their health and well being on proper information.
2. Sufficient information means informing the patient of the availability of other treatments (and forms of testing).
3. That the patient is informed of the material risks of taking the medical intervention and the material risks of declining it.
If consent is given but the Patient subsequently proves that information provided at the time breached the above common law test of informed consent, the Tort of battery is committed and the medication is unlawful.
The High Court has found children incapable of providing Gillick Competency for experimental medicines with unknown long term effects. Schools therefore risk being sued for battery if ignoring Parental preferences. See Bell v Tavistock [2020] EWHC 3274
judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl…
These principles are discussed without reference to case law on this important NHS page on Free and Informed Consent and Gillick Competency. nhs.uk/conditions/con…
The fundamental common law right to free and informed consent, based on the ancient Tort of battery (tresspass to the person), are valid in all 16 Commonwealth Realms and both the Republic of Ireland and USA, where English common law is retained as a body of law.
In Ireland, evidence that English common law rights are retained can be found in the Statute Revision Act (2007) which retained Magna Carta and most of the English Bill of Rights (1688) and much, much more. irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2007/act/2…
In USA, English common law rights are retained by the 9th Amendment of the Constitution "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.", hence why US courts refer to them. constitution.congress.gov/constitution/a…
Law that provides rights sit above normal laws in English law and provide lawful excuse to statutory obligations with this acknowledged by courts. see Art.29 Magna Carta (1297), which states: "we will not deny or defer to any man either Justice or Right." legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1cc1929…
Another case to read is Burton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2017] EWCA Civ 62 regarding Doctor's obligation to provide information to inform consent. bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/…
Happy for Solicitors to DM and work with me or folk who want to work on template letters to send out.
For those not familiar with our organisation, here are the articles we have written on Covid. westonaprice.org/coronavirus/
Covid passports also recognise self certified free and informed consent.
"If you have a medical reason which means you cannot be vaccinated or tested, you may be asked to self-declare this medical exemption."
gov.uk/guidance/nhs-c…
Also see Art.IV Acts of Union (1706-7)
"That all the Subjects of the UK of GB shall from & after the Union have full freedom & Intercourse of Trade & Navigation to & from any port or place within the said UK & the Dominions"
legislation.gov.uk/aep/Ann/6/11/p…
For our friends in New Zealand, you also have these common law rights, but additionally, Art.11 of your 1990 Bill of Rights states:
"Everyone has the right to refuse to undergo any medical treatment."
legislation.govt.nz/act/public/199…
🚨Covid Pass Exemptions🚨
"customers may declare a medical exemption directly with you. You & your staff SHOULD NOT ask for evidence of the exemption."
You must "comply with all the relevant legal obligations, Equalities Act & Guidance (+ Informed consent) nhsx.nhs.uk/covid-19-respo…
People have asked for this to be put into simple English. UK law basically states, your body, your choice. These various legal authorities and government guidance provide fancy ways of stating what we know to be true, that we are free to choose what we put in our bodies.
To support our work in the UK and access our video library of previous natural health conferences, visit our website, where you can subscribe for £2 a month.
We also have plenty of free videos for those not familiar with our unique approach to health : westonaprice.london
Seasonal illness is caused primarily by Vitamin D deficiency, not contagion. It is caused by low fat diets & industrial, sun deplete farming (Vitamin D is fat soluble) & statin induced cholesterol deficiency because Vitamin D is produced from cholesterol. westonaprice.org/health-topics/…
Put medical preferences on your last will and testament citing SS v Richmond [2021] EWCOP 31.
Informed consent is has an early authority in USA that does not seem to have been overturned.
Cardozo J in Schloendorff v Society of New York Hospital 105 NE 92 (NY, 1914) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schloendo…
Justice Benjamin Cardozo wrote in the Court's opinion as follows:
"Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body; and a surgeon who performs an operation without his patient's consent commits an assault for which he is liable in damages. This is true except in cases of emergency,,,
,,where the patient is unconscious and where it is necessary to operate before consent can be obtained."
The court found the charitable hospital had immunity, that the litigant should have sued the surgeon to obtain relief, but that principle was overturned in Bing v. Thunig 1957
In Chester v Afshar [2004] UKHL 41 The House of Lords decided that a doctor's failure to fully inform a patient of all surgery risks vitiates the need to show that harm would have been caused by the failure to inform.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chester_v…
Sidaway vs Bethlem [1985] AC 871
"A mentally competent patient has an absolute right to refuse to consent to medical treatment for any reason, rational or irrational, or for no reason at all, even where that decision may lead to his or her own death."
bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/…
Missouri vs McNeely, 569 US _ (2013) – caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-cou…
“…this Court has never retreated from its recognition that any compelled intrusion into the human body implicates significant, constitutionally protected privacy interests.”
🚨Care Home Vaccine Mandate Letter🚨
Our letter is now available. It explains in detail how the mandate is a hoax, what your rights are and how to assert them.
It also explains to care home operators their due diligence and all reasonable steps defence.
🚨Care Home Vaccine Mandate Letter🚨
Our letter is now available. It explains in detail how the mandate is a hoax, what your rights are and how to assert them.
It also explains to care home operators their due diligence and all reasonable steps defence.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Weston A. Price Foundation, London Chapter

Weston A. Price Foundation, London Chapter Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @WAPFLondon

Jul 8, 2023
@jimmcmanusph your conflation of schools being able to ask child with measles to isolate with any real power for them to so alongside the reckless claim that the vaccinated can come to school in @hertscc area is unlawful because there are no such laws requiring unvaccinated… https://t.co/Wn7dvId50otwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Also, the letter is negligent because it encourages a medical treatment without discharging your common law duty to take reasonable care to ensure that the patient is aware of any material risks involved in any recommended treatment.
All you have done is disclosed a bias view of… https://t.co/v3KRk2iKdUtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
One of the key alternative treatments that should be disclosed is resolving malnutrition. Insufficient nutrition (particularly vitamin A deficiency) is the leading risk factor and parents have not had this disclosed.

See Measles: A Close Examination of the Facts to Counter the… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Read 7 tweets
May 1, 2023
The Covid dance routines were Soviet Socialist Realism.
This thread sets out the similarities and contrasts with the individualistic theatrics of Meyerhold, who Stalin had executed.
In the West, the capitalist public were excluded, only socialist health care workers could dance.
The plot excludes spontaneous (selfish) Soviet enemies without class consciousness (You the locked down audience) vs 💉'd Soviet hero's dancing in PPE who through compliant class consciousness and self sacrifice transcend the lockdown to joyfully dance.
In Soviet Russia or Communist China, the public having been socialised into the proper class consciousness are involved in the dance routines but this couldn't have been done in the West where we are contaminated with selfish, spontaneous individualism.
Read 15 tweets
Feb 20, 2023
The threat of a biosecurity state was made clear by @WHO from at least 2008. Here we were warning about lockdown in 2011 via @economicvoice

"COULD SUPER-FLU BE CAUSED BY THIS YEAR’S FLU VACCINE" Posted by Philip Ridley | Nov 4, 2011
economicvoice.com/could-super-fl…
#Brexit from @WHO.
WHO, in “Addressing ethical issues in pandemic influenza planning” 2008 p36 discuss the absurd idea of “Valid limitations on human rights”. They claim ICCPR 1976, Art.4.1 allows nations to “suspend most other civil & political rights”
apps.who.int/iris/handle/10…
Art.29 UDHR (1948) "These rights & freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes & principles of the UN." un.org/en/about-us/un… maliciously counters Art.29 Magna Carta (1297) "we will not deny or defer to any man either Justice or Right". legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1cc1929…
Read 14 tweets
Feb 3, 2023
@goddeketal Our first red flag was in 2008.
WHO, in “Addressing ethical issues in pandemic influenza planning” 2008 p36 discuss “Valid limitations on human rights”. They claim ICCPR 1976, Art.4.1 allows nations to “suspend most other civil & political rights”
apps.who.int/iris/handle/10…
@goddeketal People should have been freaking out since the 1976 ICCPR Treaty. See Art.4.1
@goddeketal It began with Art.29 UDHR (1948) "These rights & freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes & principles of the UN." un.org/en/about-us/un… vs Art.29 Magna Carta (1297) "we will not deny or defer to any man either Justice or Right". legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1cc1929…
Read 5 tweets
Feb 3, 2023
Translation:
"We are meeting to discuss how to come up with fake crisis to fear the people into implementing global socialism and sacrificing to us their freedom, rights and liberty and way of life to a global government for and by the UN and their corporate stakeholders."
@UN's @ClubOfRome's 1st Global Revolution "searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, threat of global warming, water shortages, famine (Plandemics?) & the like would fit the bill" "The real enemy, is humanity itself.” en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_First…
#Brexit from @WHO.
WHO, in “Addressing ethical issues in pandemic influenza planning” 2008 p36 discuss the absurd idea of “Valid limitations on human rights”. They claim ICCPR 1976, Art.4.1 allows nations to “suspend most other civil & political rights”
apps.who.int/iris/handle/10…
Read 5 tweets
Jan 29, 2023
We have asked @BritishArmy via FOI for any Parliamentary Consent that they obtained for the domestic deployment of 77th Brigade against the people during the Covid-19 P(l)andemic.
Also setting out the associated constitutional law. whatdotheyknow.com/request/parlia… via @whatdotheyknow
We have been tweeting on this issue since August 2020.
These unconstitutional acts constitute Contempt of @UKParliament that MPs can prosecute. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_…
It also constitutes misconduct in public office, an offence that can be sentenced to life imprisonment.
cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance…
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(