Ben Casselman Profile picture
Jul 27, 2021 15 tweets 5 min read Read on X
The pandemic changed nearly every aspect of our lives -- work, play, parenting, even sleep. But it didn't affect everyone the same way.
@ellawinthrop & I dove deep into the American Time Use Survey to see the effects of Covid, and how we adapted to it.
nytimes.com/interactive/20…
Note: The pandemic also disrupted data collection itself, so all these charts are for May 10 - Dec. 31, after the most intense periods of lockdown. So think of it as a glimpse of how we lived life as the pandemic dragged on.
We spent a lot less time with people outside our own households in 2020 and a lot more time alone. Seniors spent the most time alone (8+ waking hours), but it was young ppl who experienced the biggest change. Teens (15-19) went from spending 4.5 hours alone in 2019 to 6 in 2020.
What did we do with the extra time? More screen time, more phone/video calls, more cooking. Some interesting tidbits in the breakdowns here: Young people (unlike everyone else) spent *more* time grooming last year, but less time exercising.
You've heard (or experienced!) a lot about parenting in the pandemic, but the time-use numbers are still revealing. Mothers of school-age children (6-12) spent *8 hours a day* taking care of kids in 2020, two hours more than in 2019. (Dads spent about 5.5 hours.)
(Note that these parenting charts include both "primary" and "secondary" childcare -- i.e. time spent directly caring for children and time watching the kids while doing other things. The latter experienced by far the bigger increase.)
More time with the kids meant more time cooking while parenting, more time cleaning while parenting, and especially more time working while parenting. Mothers of school-age children spent 48 more minutes on average working while parenting in 2020.
Note that's an average for ALL women with kids ages 6-12, including those who didn't work at all. If you look only at women who worked, they spent close to two more hours a day parenting-while-working than in 2019. (Dads spent an extra 45 minutes.)
In married households, men and women shouldered the extra childcare burden fairly equally (although moms still did much more overall). But single moms took on a ton of extra childcare work -- nearly three more hours a day.
Note: I didn't distinguish here between same-sex and opposite-sex couples. BLS, which oversees the survey, codes everyone as "male" or "female," so we don't have data on people identifying in other ways.
Americans on average worked less in 2020, but that's because fewer people were working. Among those who did work, total hours per day changed little. But *where* those hours were worked changed a lot.
Looking at the data month by month, a slim majority of working hours were done from home in May. (Recall that we don't have March/April data.) But after that, most people were back at their workplaces.
Work is where we see some of the starkest racial and socioeconomic divides. Hispanic and Latino workers were more likely to lose jobs; Black workers were more likely to have to keep working in person. White and Asian workers were much more likely to be able to work from home.
If you have a graduate degree, chances are you were working from home last year (or still are now). If you have a high school diploma or less, you probably had to keep going in person all year, if you kept your job at all.
More tidbits in our story, so have a look. And there is TONS more to explore in this data, so if you've got ideas, send 'em my way. Thanks to @ellawinthrop for the amazing graphics.
nytimes.com/interactive/20…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ben Casselman

Ben Casselman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @bencasselman

Jun 4
CBO is out with its final cost estimate of the tax-and-spending bill passed by the House.
- Revenue ⬇️ by $3.7 trillion over 10 years
- Spending ⬇️ by $1.3 trillion
- Debt ⬆️ by $2.4 trillion over 10 years
- Uninsured pop. ⬆️ by 10.9 million in 2034
Full analysis: cbo.gov/publication/61…
The spending cuts mostly come from Medicaid ($344 billion over 10 years), food stamps and related programs ($295 billion) and the Affordable Care Act ($132 billion).
Note that these estimates don't take into account the macroeconomic impacts of the policy changes (it is not "dynamic" in wonk parlance). So to the extent tax/spending cuts affect economic growth, that will also affect revenues. CBO is working on an analysis that estimates these effects.
Read 4 tweets
Nov 4, 2024
So this was an interesting finding from @NateSilver538, but one I found odd because @BLS_gov publishes CPI for regions (and for some metro areas) but not for states. So I dug into it a bit, and there's less here than meets the eye.
Nate's data is coming from this tracker from the @JECRepublicans. They don't have a state-level inflation estimate either, though. They just use BLS's estimate of regional inflation and apply it to an estimate of household spending when Biden took office.
jec.senate.gov/public/index.c…
You can see this if you hover over their map (or download their data). States in the same region all have the same cumulative rates of inflation. But they differ in the amount of inflation experienced in dollar terms because some states have higher avg household incomes.
Read 14 tweets
Aug 28, 2024
I hate that @ellawinthrop is leaving us, but I'm so glad I got to work with her on her last piece for @nytimesbusiness. She's the best, most collaborative, most creative visual journalist I've ever worked with. A thread with a few of my favorite Ben-and-Ella collabs:
1. This iconic chart showing the scale of the pandemic job losses:
nytimes.com/interactive/20…
2. This piece digging deep into the American Time Use Survey to look at how the pandemic changed our lives:
nytimes.com/interactive/20…
Read 6 tweets
Jul 11, 2024
Good news on inflation! U.S. consumer prices FELL 0.1 percent in June, and were up just 3 percent from a year earlier. "Core" prices, stripping out volatile food and fuel, were up 0.1 percent from May and 3.3 percent from last June. Data: …Live coverage: bls.gov/news.release/c…
nytimes.com/live/2024/07/1…
This is the second straight month where there has been effectively no inflation on a month-to-month basis. Prices were flat in May, and down in June.
If you take a longer view here: At 3% year-over-year, inflation is no longer outside historical norms (though it is still higher than immediately prepandemic). And over the past three months, rents have risen at an annual rate of ***just 1.1%.***
Image
Image
Read 7 tweets
Jul 2, 2024
Job openings ticked up in May (but only because April was revised down). Layoffs edged up. Quits basically flat. All consistent with a gradually slowing, but not collapsing, job market. #JOLTS
Full data: bls.gov/news.release/j…
There were 8.1 million job openings on the last day of May. That's up from 7.9 million in April, revised down from the 8.1m originally reported.
Larger story here is that openings are clearly falling quickly, even if they're still high in absolute terms. #JOLTS Image
There were 1.2 job openings for every unemployed worker in May. That's more or less where things stood immediately before the pandemic (when the labor market was widely viewed as strong but not overheated). Image
Read 7 tweets
Jan 25, 2024
The U.S. economy slowed in the final three months of the year, but only because the Q3 number was so strong -- the 3.3% growth rate in Q4 was well above expectations and certainly offered no hints of a brewing recession. (Belated charts thread)
Image
This is not a case where the volatile components of G.D.P. made a weak quarter look strong, as sometimes happens. Measures of underlying demand were also very strong.
Image
Image
For all the predictions of a recession, G.D.P. growth actually *accelerated* in 2023, and topped the prepandemic average growth rate as well. Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(