A thread on Twitter abuse....when I spoke up in Science, with many colleagues, about the #conservation risks of banning trophy hunting (TH) without better options ready, I was totally naive about the backlash, especially on social media. Instructive to look at a little of it 1/12
There are common themes - the first is that anyone who speaks up must be corrupt. I had media coverage of our 0.8% of historic funding from TH orgs - hugely outweighed by funding from groups against TH, but why let truth get in the way of a good story? 2/12
Another common element, trying to tag or approach supporters/donors/employers to try to force them to distance from you. Total disregard for how this could affect real conservation work on the ground, of course, & happily we have great supporters so has not worked... 3/12
Another constant theme is the idea that we are puppets for the 'powerful TH lobby' and somehow 'alleged' conservationists, not real ones voicing our own, informed opinions - guess the real explanation is too threatening? 4/12
The lies (I really don't trash anyone on Twitter, even when sorely tempted!) & false binaries are extremely common - you have to be pro or anti TH, corrupt or pure, & conservationists apparently can't accept realities like killing. A real hatred of grey areas & realities...5/12
Some of it is just nasty abuse - here someone incorrectly labels me an ignorant killer, and 'wishes me the worst' - which charmingly gets multiple likes and retweets....6/12
Another example here, this is all too common, and often with sexist abuse thrown in for good measure....7/12
Sometimes people go as far as mocking up images and pretending they are you, trying to discredit you and your conservation work......alarming, particularly as there are quite a few of these.....8/12
Quite a few stray into threats of violence, some more overtly than others. This person would like to see lions 'play' with me, I have had plenty of people suggest worse....and so have colleagues 9/12
Not all bad - lovely when people try to speak out against this, though then they often get abuse as well 10/12
Overall all a bit depressing - we should be able to have informed & even controversial debates without abuse. I get asked if it is worth it, & the answer is always yes. We cannot be silenced by lies & abuse, speaking up for evidence based conservation is crucial. 11/12
But having said that, it sometimes requires quite a lot of wine to get through the nonsense - and sharing experiences with @AdamHartScience @Nikolaj_Bi @nscscience & many others who go through the same. Cheers to you all!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Amy Dickman 🦁

Amy Dickman 🦁 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(