2) Although the sample size is small, based in Dayton OH, their findings are aligned with several other recent studies highlighting similar motivations for use.
Here's a part of their descriptive table showing how many used it to manage opioid withdrawal and for other reasons:
3) The study used the Drug, Set, and Setting model to really synthesize and tie together the numerous factors that contribute to increased use.
Setting: Increased availability of meth
Set: Expectancies and beliefs about how it could work
Drug: Meth characteristics being helpful
4) This study tells us that people who use opioids continue to develop novel and innovative strategies to manage and cope with opioid withdrawal on the streets outside of formal treatment settings.
5) If you are interested in reading more studies about this phenomenon, I'd encourage you to read this co-authored study by @prof__lopez in Oregon which also examined community/structural/policy drivers: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
6) A large-scale mixed methods study from a few years ago with incoming OUD patients from 2011-2018 who reported methamphetamine use motivations: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
7) A study out of Australia co-authored by @higgspg also examined motivations for co-use among people who injected both opioids and methamphetamine, highlighting the desire for pleasure/intoxication and managing opioid withdrawal harmreductionjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.11…
8) Zooming out for a second, and thinking about the increased number of methamphetamine-involved overdose deaths, this can help to explain SOME of the increases we are seeing and why people may test positive for meth/opioids due to co-use or recent use.
9) This all should also make us ask ourselves about how we are helping to ensure that co-users are learning harm reduction strategies for both drug classes, but also whether low-threshold MOUD could help reduce reliance upon meth, whether Rx stimulants can help with low energy.
10) All this to just remind you that drug use is often a proactive attempt by the user to cope and manage their lives. Yes, there are trade-offs, but people are often doing the best they can with what they've got.
FIN.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
✅Illicit drug use occurs in every zip code but drug arrests don't.
✅A drug arrest record (even without a conviction or incarceration) can mess up your life.
✅The drug war has made social workers, doctors, teachers, etc. into frontline enforcers like cops.
✅Drug use disorders are the only health condition where being actively 'symptomatic' makes you a 'criminal' too.
✅The drug war and criminalization makes recovery harder to achieve.
✅The drug war incentivizes unsafe drug use and behaviors to avoid law enforcement detection.
✅You're still a drug warrior if you only want to free your drug of choice (looking at you, plant activists)
✅You're still a drug warrior if you see drug users as 'victims' who need saving
✅You're still a drug warrior if you only want decrim, but not a safe supply
🧵A THREAD 🧵 1) I've been doing harm reduction work for 15 years and I've learned a few lessons about how to talk about it with people who aren't quite there yet.
I presented on this a few years ago and I'm going to share my slides and talking points here with you today -
2) First of all, it's important for US to reframe.
Rather than seeing non-harm reductionists as RESISTANT, I think it's more helpful to see them as RELUCTANT.
This helps us to approach conversations with more compassion and patience (altho not always easy!)
3) Then it's important to think about the types of reactions and responses you often hear from folks who may be reluctant about harm reduction.
One of my final points at the #StigmaSummit was the need for us to include people who CURRENTLY use drugs in
➡️developing programmatic policies to address stigma and barriers,
➡️evaluating them, and
➡️ measuring them.
And that they need to be compensated for their time. (1/3)
And that researchers must include and PAY people who CURRENTLY use drugs in research abt them & their needs:
➡️Developing questions
➡️Gathering data
➡️Analyzing/interpreting data
➡️Writing and presenting on findings
If you are a community org that has been contacted by a research team for data collection, YOU HAVE RIGHTS. Some tips:
➡️Form review committees to vet researchers (charge for the review process!)
➡️Create a detailed Memorandum of Agreement #StigmaSummitdrugpolicy.org/sites/default/…
The rate of all-cause mortality for people on Opioid Agonist Treatment (buprenorphine or methadone) was 53% LOWER than the rate when people were not on these medications. (1/x)
“This association was consistent regardless of patient sex, age, geographic location, HIV status, and hepatitis C virus status and whether drugs were taken through injection."
AND
“Associations were not different for methadone vs buprenorphine” (2/x)
The researchers found there was:
➡️52% lower risk of suicide,
➡️28% lower risk of cancer,
➡️59% lower drug-related,
➡️41% lower alcohol-related , and
➡️ 31% lower cardiovascular-related mortality during treatment with buprenorphine or methadone. (3/x)
The drug war and criminalization are the unmeasured confounding variables that impact ALL other variables and outcomes in drug and drug policy research.
We don't even know the full extent of how they impact everything we THINK we know about drugs.
FULL STOP.
(1/x)
Some examples:
➡️Any study about the supposed effects of an illicit drug on emotional, mental, physical health and well-being of users.
As long as the participants used the unmonitored and unregulated illicit supply, you never really know what you're measuring. (2/x)
➡️Any study abt the association btwn illicit drug use & outcomes like risk behaviors, treatment engagement, 'recidivism,' housing, employment, etc.
If ppl fear arrest, incarceration, or having a criminal record bars you from accessing these services, we can't pin it on use (3/x)