This week, I wrote a piece about the importance of studying the cat genome.

I think there are some important implications for human health. But I am also hopeful that this will mean big advancements for veterinary medicine. 1/

theatlantic.com/science/archiv…
The day this piece published, one of my own cats, Calvin, was diagnosed with a serious condition, likely with genetic roots, that impacts his heart function. There is no cure. We don't yet know his prognosis. I am absolutely heartbroken. 2/
We adopted Calvin and his brother, Hobbes, almost 5 years ago, to the day. Since then, they have both brought immeasurable light into my life, and have been my biggest source of comfort during the pandemic. 3/
The day we brought Calvin home, he was scared and confused and spent the entire afternoon hiding under the bed. 4/
But by the next evening, he was crawling into bed with us and curling up on my left shoulder to sleep. The vet said it was kitten behavior, he'd grow out of it. Five years later, he's a lot bigger, and my shoulder's a bit too small. But it's still his favorite spot to be. 5/
Yesterday, I rushed him to the hospital because his breathing had turned fast and shallow. Even when he was feeling at his worst, he pressed his little face to mine when I leaned next to the carrier. I wanted to give him all the comfort I could. 6/
He had to be admitted for assessment. I waited in the parking lot; I couldn't be with him or his vets because of the pandemic.

Last night was the first night I've ever had to spend in the apartment without him, while he was cared for in the ICU. 7/
Calvin is coming home today, and we'll be medicating him and caring for him from now on. I can't help but wonder where we'd be if he'd had the opportunity to be screened for this earlier, with more knowledge of feline genomics to guide us. 8/

theatlantic.com/science/archiv…
My hope is that a better understanding of cat genetics and physiology will help other owners catch these conditions early, or at least better understand why they occur. It's a niche pursuit. But if it saves the lives of just a few animals, then it seems worth it to me. 9/9

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Katherine J. Wu, Ph.D.

Katherine J. Wu, Ph.D. Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KatherineJWu

30 Jul
howdy!

remember Ct values? those numbers spit out by certain types of PCR tests, including some of the ones we use to test for the coronavirus?

let's talk. 1/
Ct values correlate with how much viral RNA is in the sample. so if you're running several samples on a test platform, and some have higher Cts, those have *less* RNA (it's a reverse scale; Cts count how many times you have to copy the genetic material before it's "visible") 2/
Ct values do not tell you if the viral RNA belongs to an intact virus or an infectious virus. they also don't measure how directly "transmissible" someone is. to measure transmission, we need epidemiological data - how are *actual humans* spreading the virus? 3/
Read 5 tweets
29 Jul
If your antibody levels drop over time... it's not the end of the world. Actually, it's what happens naturally. It's expected. It's your body being economical with its resources. 1/

theatlantic.com/science/archiv…
There are so many other immune cells and molecules protecting you; antibodies aren't the whole story.

But if you're worried about antibodies specifically—which, yes, are powerful and important and do play a big role in protection— 2/

theatlantic.com/science/archiv…
Think of it this way. Antibodies are ephemeral proteins. Individual antibodies aren't built to last forever. They'll ebb after an infectious threat has passed. But the body retains the capacity to produce them. 3/
Read 10 tweets
22 Jul
There's been a renewed wave of coverage on breakthroughs (post-vaccination infections), so I thought I'd do a brief thread.

Breakthroughs aren't new. They're also expected. Researchers saw them coming. Here's why they happen. 1/

theatlantic.com/science/archiv…
Let's first get our definitions straight. Vaccines, first and foremost, prevent *illness*, especially of the serious sort. They teach the body to rein the virus in, and keep it from running roughshod over your tissues. It's harder, though, to stop infections entirely. 2/
Remarkably, our vaccines do this in some people! That's worth celebrating, but it's the wrong goalpost to have in most cases.

That said, our vaccines are still REDUCING infection and transmission, even if they're not stamping it out. 3/
Read 13 tweets
22 Jul
I feel great about being fully vaccinated. I still want to give my immune system the best chance it's got at protecting me from disease. 1/

theatlantic.com/health/archive…
I laid out some of my thinking process for masking again indoors, in the age of Delta. This is my own personal risk calculation, but I hope it's helpful for some other folks who are puzzling this over. 2/
There's no *one right answer*—rather, everyone has to think about their own local conditions: hospitalizations, vaccination rates, variant prevalence, etc. But it would serve us all to be flexible. This pandemic isn't over. And I don't want to lose the momentum we've built. 3/
Read 4 tweets
20 Jul
a gentler reminder that there's more to vaccine effectiveness than neutralizing antibodies
get to know some of your other (very date-able) defenders here
theatlantic.com/science/archiv…
and remember that the immune system is used to dealing with changes in the pathogens it sees

theatlantic.com/science/archiv…
Read 4 tweets
13 Apr
I am not an MD, so I’ll offer just this: it’s very encouraging to see federal regulators take swift action on the J&J vaccine. This is the process working as it should. If there is a true link between the vaccine and these rare clots, they will work to identify it. 1/
They may instate an age restriction, as some countries have done for the similar AstraZeneca vaccine—perhaps younger people, especially younger people who are biologically female, may end up needing to seek an alternative. But for now: these cases appear VERY RARE. 2/
So far less than 1 in 1 million. And this DOES NOT detract from the effectiveness of the vaccine, which is excellent.

If you have gotten this vaccine, keep those numbers in mind. All clots also appeared within 2 weeks of injection. 3/
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(