"the collection and use of individuals’ government-issued ID and selfie photos through the app for identity verification and fraud prevention by using facial recognition technology was not compliant with PIPA and HIA"
"collecting (recording) and using audio and video consultations through the Babylon app goes beyond what is essential to provide a health service and, again, is not consistent with provincial and national guidelines for providing virtual health care"
The privacy policy "was found to be unclear, lengthy and contained inaccuracies". Babylon did not meet "requirements to develop policies and practices that include information regarding the countries in which personal information is collected, used, disclosed or stored".

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lorian Hardcastle

Lorian Hardcastle Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Lorian_H

29 Jul
What fresh hell awaits us today, friends?
The actual announcement itself isn't problematic. Exploring whether Stollery should be a freestanding hospital. Now I'm just waiting for the grilling about yesterday's announcement.
Question time. Dr Joffe (from AHS) asked about lifting of restrictions. He is asked whether they were consulted and whether they endorse the changes. He answers the first part on consultation, but doesn't answer the part on endorsement.
Read 9 tweets
7 Jul
It's been a while since I've looked at the lobbying records to see who is knocking on Shandro's door. Apart from the usual visits from big pharma, Shopper's Drug Mart and Loblaws, here's who else has been paying him a visit.... /1
Telus has been lobbying re: "enhanced access to virtual healthcare" and "determin[ing] possible new and/or next iteration of existing AB Gov/TELUS programming...to ensure TELUS maximizes its reach to support...mobile healthcare access" /2
Alberta Surgical Group Ltd. lobbying re: "To achieve contracted arrangements with Alberta
Health and Alberta Health Services" /3
Read 8 tweets
26 Nov 20
Secret public health meeting recordings. Kenney & Shandro micromanaged civil servants, overruled expert advice, & pushed an early relaunch that focused on the economy & avoiding the appearance of curtailing freedoms over safeguarding public health: cbc.ca/news/canada/ed…
Kenney wanted "evidence-based thresholds for mandatory restrictions that [were] effectively impossible to meet."

"[W]e put our best public health advice forward" and Kenney is "more concerned about the economy."

The gov used Hinshaw "as a shield to deflect criticism."
Although AHS "is responsible for enforcing public health orders" and "is supposed to operate at arm's length from gov", Shandro exerted control over enforcement. He didn't want them to enforce anything, just to educate. 29,000 complaints and only 62 enforcement orders.
Read 4 tweets
26 Nov 20
The first public health order is out (a full day after coming into effect...it is problematic to be bound by legal obligations that you don't yet have access to). This one doesn't address businesses, even though they will be bound by restrictions starting on the 27th. /1
So they have little time to understand their legal obligations and prepare. Notably, many people seemed to think that the business restrictions apply across the province. They don't. They apply in purple areas. /2
A person in a private residence can't permit a person who doesn't normally reside there to enter, with a bunch of reasonable exceptions (health care, co-parenting, housekeeping, child care, repairs, etc). /3
Read 9 tweets
23 Nov 20
I'm seeing disturbing accounts of Shandro's appearance at a UCP meeting in Peace River yesterday. These accounts suggest that the province's strategy has very little to do with public health evidence and a reliance on discredited experts.
Read 11 tweets
13 Nov 20
To summarize the privacy commissioner's thoughts re: bill 46. Netcare will now be managed and operated by the gov. This is not necessarily a concern but a "significant departure" with uncertain benefits. She wonders what consultation w/ health service providers occurred. 1/6
Rules around duties/responsibilities of gov will be elaborated on in regulations. She strongly advises consultation with her on this (which didn't happen pre-bill 46). This bill creates a situation where the gov has "the ability to significantly broaden access to Netcare" 2/6
This includes access out of AB or even CAN. Beyond drs in Lloydminster, she's unsure of the gov's intent but says this will make it difficult for her to "effectively investigate or hold accountable" those out of province and may limit the recourse available to Albertans 3/6
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(