An amicus brief filed by Robert P. George (@McCormickProf) argues that fetuses have a constitutional right to be born, so federal courts must rewrite state laws to criminalize abortion and appoint attorneys to represent fetuses that may be terminated. supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/1… 
The logical consequence of George's position is that, as a matter of constitutional law, women who terminate their own pregnancies must be prosecuted for homicide, and women who obtain illegal abortions must be prosecuted for aiding and abetting homicide. supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/1…
George later suggests that states may "immunize from prosecution certain participants in wrongful killings." But this claim conflicts with the entire rest of the brief, which argues that "any carve-outs" from homicide laws are unconstitutional if they treat fetuses differently.
This brief, and others filed in support of Mississippi's abortion restriction, abandon the Scalia/Thomas argument for judicial restraint and instead assert that federal courts must actively prevent states from permitting abortion under virtually all circumstances.
To state the obvious, George's position would upend federalism by requiring courts to rewrite state criminal codes while commandeering state officials to impose near-total bans on abortion from conception onward. His theory would obliterate the very concept of state sovereignty.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
