"... AND THE R. CONGRESSMAN" makes the (insurrectionist) plot even clearer.

In view of this news, the R congressmen who voted against certification have to be worried about federal prosecution as well.

(See my previous thread.)

Trump destroys everything he touches.
So far, everyone has been weighing in about the implications of today’s news for tfg, but so far they have failed to notice the implications for R members of Congress like Jim Jordan and Kevin McCarthy. 1/14
Jordan admitted on Fox News that he did have at least one phone conversation with tfg on Jan 6. McCarthy disclosed that he had as well back in January. 2/14
They (and other Rs like Sen. Ted Cruz) will now be subpoenaed and put under oath by a first-rate and very hostile committee of the House; and they will be investigated for being complicit in a conspiracy to unlawfully overturn the 2020 election. 3/14
The news today is that Trump attempted to pressure the DOJ into falsely claiming that the election was “corrupt” (despite being told that the Department had no evidence that it was) and *to leave the rest to me and the R. Congressmen.* 4/14
Many bogus rationales were given by Jordan, Cruz, and others for voting against certification of the election on 1/6, but it takes some thought to realize just how insidious, sinister, and downright *seditious* they were.

See, e.g.,: tinyurl.com/yz36arbn 5/14
Trump intended a coup, and now the question immediately arises: What did key R members of Congress know about it, and when did they know it?

(With friends like Trump, who needs enemies?) 6/14
Key R Congressmen will be put under oath about all of this, and it’s not just Trump who is exposed: they are too!

If they were complicit in a conspiracy to overturn an election, they can be sure that the feds will get the goods on them, if they don’t already. 7/14
Keep in mind that all phone calls in and out of the WH are monitored by the Natsec division of the DOJ. That is what common sense about natsec would tell us, and in fact it was pretty much confirmed during the Ukraine impeachment hearings. 8/14
This means that R Congressmen who will be subpoenaed are at extreme risk of perjury. They dare not lie under oath like Roger Stone did (which got Stone a prison sentence that he escaped only because tfg commuted his sentence). 9/14
Federal prosecutors and investigators will be loath to disclose any incriminating phone calls between Trump and R Congressmen. Such disclosures would be explosive and quite possibly problematic politically for the Department.

But they will if they have to. 10/14
I am convinced that the DOJ is prepared to take down Trump and all of his political enablers by any means necessary, if that is what they have to do if the evidence they are putting together shows guilt beyond any reasonable doubt. 11/14
That I believe is the point that was being made by @TomJChicago in a post that I retweeted earlier today: 12/14
“Hit him w/ everything they’ve got. And they’ve got a lot more.”

Exactly. The DOJ is, in my view, lining things up to go places they have never gone before--and are otherwise loath to go--if the evidence leads them there. 13/14
Today was likely a very bad day, not just for tfg, but for the likes of Jordan, McCarthy, and Cruz. 14/14

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thomas Wood 🌊

Thomas Wood 🌊 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @twoodiac

30 Jul
Of course it isn’t.

(Business Insider): “A little-known law could determine whether the DOJ would represent Trump in a Capitol-riot lawsuit or if he has to fend for himself.” 1/4 tinyurl.com/yftnflj8
Furthermore: action that attempts to undermine the certification of electoral results (in clear violation of the oath to enforce the laws) cries out, not just for placing such action outside the tort protection of the Westfall Act, but for federal *prosecution* as well. 2/4
That is the legal case that I am convinced federal prosecutors must be building--and they appear to be doing it very, very carefully and thoroughly. 3/4
Read 5 tweets
30 Jul
Ingraham thinks she has a constitutional right to assert against an airline that might bar her from flying without proof of vaccination.

(Ingraham is a graduate of UVA Law and clerked at SCOTUS.)
Ingraham’s reference was to Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), in which the Supreme Court upheld the authority of states to enforce compulsory vaccination laws. (wiki) 1/3
(Note, too, that the present controversy is not about mandatory vaccinations at all, but rather over existing and proposed laws and private actions burdening the unvaccinated.) 2/3
Read 4 tweets
21 Jul
The most important and timely opinion piece and political analysis of the day (by the formidable Jennifer Rubin)--about “Red Dog” Rs who are leaving the party in response to the anti-democratic turn of the GOP. 1/5 tinyurl.com/yg7dxfhu
2/5 Image
3/5 Image
Read 6 tweets
19 Jul
Why should your medical insurance premiums go up because some of your co-workers refuse to be vaxxed?

Likewise, why should your premiums go up if you are in a private plan with members who refuse to be vaxxed?
1/3 tinyurl.com/yhvk3e34
Over 99% of the very costly medical care required for covid patients is incurred now by the unvaxxed. Insurance companies should start raising medical insurance premiums on the unvaxxed to reflect this fact. 2/3
Companies pay for their employees’ medical insurance on a monthly basis. These companies will then start requiring vaccination by their employees and start pressuring R politicians. Same for people in private plans.

(The cost differential can be calculated by actuaries.) 3/3
Read 4 tweets
15 Jul
"Trump is described as an 'impulsive, mentally unstable and unbalanced individual who suffers from an inferiority complex.'”

There is also apparent confirmation that the Kremlin possesses kompromat. tinyurl.com/yh2g2jaq
This appeared only days after the news broke that the leading Russia- (and Putin-) supported ransomware outfit was taken offline.

A leak (very risky there) would show a serious rift w Putin, by moderates who feel strong enough to challenge Putin's aggression against the U.S.
Some have questioned why this story appeared in The Guardian and not WaPo, NYT etc. Easily explained. The Guardian claims that other Western intelligence agencies have seen the doc, but the *media* leak came from M16 via Steele (who still has contacts there) and then Harding.
Read 12 tweets
25 Jun
@tribelaw Massive student and faculty non-operation will sink the survey. A 1A case defending a state institution would be very strong, but *individuals* cannot be forced to disclose their voting behavior and political views. DeSantis hasn't thought this through and will regret it.
@tribelaw Does the U.S. Census ask individuals to disclose their political party affiliation or their political views?

No.

Would it be unconstitutional for the U.S. Census to include such questions?

Yes.
@tribelaw Public opinion surveys (e.g. by Gallup, Fox News) ask such questions. (Responses are voluntary.)

Could a state government or a public university do so constitutionally?

Of course not--especially (but not only) if such disclosure is made a condition for receiving state benefits.
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(