I have no issue with people taking additional precautions against Delta. That said, the media & the CDC are not doing a great job conveying the known risks to vaccinated people. All the available data suggest that the personal health risk to vaccinated people is very low
Having looked at the data, I personally feel very protected. I know I am not 100% protected, but I'm close. The real unknown is how much I could spread Delta if it was hanging out in my nose. The risk is not high on the individual level if vaxxed. It's high on the community level
So, for the community, it's good to do things like masking up, especially if vax rates are low. & it's fine to lower your own very low risk rate even further by masking. But you should also feel confident that the vaccines are very effective in your personal protection
Again, on a personal level, I am not concerned about myself. I would be more concerned if I were living w/ kids or medically vulnerable people. I would even be more concerned if I were living w/ my vax'ed elderly parents, who I have advised to resume masking.
I know they are mostly protected too, but, ya know, they're my parents & they're older. This is all to say: every vaccinated person's individual risk is low. We may still be a community-level threat. & extra precautions for personal protection are fine.
You can simultaneously feel:
-very confident you are personally protected
-fine with taking extra precautions to protect yourself even further
-cognizant of the risk your body may pose to others, especially unvaxx'ed &/or medically vulnerable people
There is a reason I continue to talk about *personal* risk in this thread as well as my own personal feelings. Personal risk is low. Community risk is not. What you do with the info that *personal* risk is low is up to you. It's fine if you feel more worried than I do
We all also have to be cognizant of the atmosphere we are contributing to. It is absolutely fine to be worried. But we should do so while also affirming the vaccines. There are certain groups of un-vaxed folks who might be dissuaded if they view the vaccine as ineffective

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mangy Jay

Mangy Jay Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @magi_jay

2 Aug
Honest request to liberal & progressive men: please evaluate 1. how much more annoyed you become with female politicians as you experience greater exposure to them & 2. how the level of annoyance negatively correlates w/ how often you agree w/ them & how attracted you are to them
I will admit, to my shame, but for the public good, that *I* have enough internalized misogyny that *I* become more annoyed with female politicians the more they are in the public eye. It's not universal, but it happens. If I experience it, I know you men do too.
Men are allowed to be tough but charming in positions of power. Women are not. We perceive them as "not tough" and so when they act tough, we perceive them as cold. Then when they laugh, we perceive them as frivolous or calculated.
Read 8 tweets
1 Aug
It's taken about 18 months, but as a former Tuberculosis patient, I just reached my absolute limit with Public Health hot takes from poorly informed people. It is driving me up the freaking wall.
I'm not even talking about conservatives, from whom I expect absolute nonsense. I am talking about other pundits, journalists, and analysts who are not doing the *bare minimum* to understand how infectious diseases have been historically suppressed in this country.
For the folks who are like, "public health makes no sense blah blah individual responsibility" I would like to know if they think I should have been legally mandated to take harmful antibiotics for 6 months &, if they think that was right, how the rationale differs for COVID
Read 11 tweets
1 Aug
It was multiply determined, but a few things. Polio hurt kids, so that was important. Also, people were used to living generationally w/ infectious disease. People lost siblings, children, friends. After vaccines had been around for a while (smallpox) people wanted more
There was *no* complacency about infectious disease. People saw the devastated limbs of children from polio. Or the quarantines from measles. It wasn't in the distance. When the successful polio vaccine was announced, church bells rang.
There were complications from the polio vaccine that produced hesitancy. That's when Public Health stepped up. They brought in Elvis. And the March of Dimes had *mothers* going door to door. Using mothers was an essential strategy.
Read 6 tweets
1 Aug
This is the CDC study on breakthrough infections + viral load. The study itself is fine. The data are valuable. The framing of the study is poor, as is the media reporting. These data are not generalizable to the general population for various reasons. cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/7…
To be clear, any community study will be difficult to generalize to the population. Also: I do not doubt the assertion that viral load in the noses/mouths of vaccinated people may be higher for DELTA than previous variants. I think mask mandates are good.
One specific issue with how this piece was reported is that there was a high % of immunocompromised people in the case sample. The CDC and the media should have been clearer about this for many reasons.
Read 7 tweets
30 Jul
I think it's time for the press to just start saying Trump tried to pull a soft coup.

Factually, that's what he did.

It was a coup attempt.
I respect the press's balancing act when it comes to neutrality. I know it's not easy. However, there comes a time when over-correction in the name of neutrality results in obscuring the truth.

In such cases, the press is not actually giving a neutral, fact-based account.
Trump tried to pull a soft-coup. There are multiple pieces of evidence for this. He worked on the state level. He worked on the federal (DOJ) level. And then he inspired an insurrection, which was a "harder" coup attempt.
Read 5 tweets
30 Jul
Fertility is playing a big part in anti-vaxx propaganda online. A lot of unvaccinated women cite this as a concern. "Spike protein travels to your ovary" sounds absurd, but the lies about fertility have gotten a boost from actual observations about changes in menstruation.
When I say "actual observations about changes in menstruation" I do not mean, "demonstrated causal link." I just mean, "people--including some doctors--have mentioned this in good faith & there's a physiological reason why menstrual changes might occur."
Then people hear "menstrual changes" and this feeds into the propaganda about fertility. Even if young women feel like there's just an outside chance of fertility being affected, they get hesitant & weigh this perceived chance against their perceived risk from COVID.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(