@DrJudes03@DrJoelSchwartz@PDASociety It is perfectly reasonable when 1) Help4Psychology produce an algorithm that is not representative of broader literature. E.g. see:
@DrJudes03@DrJoelSchwartz@PDASociety 4) The potential bias of participants is actively discussed in PDA literature, including SR. We know that a clinicians bias can impact a person receiving an autism dx, such as in females.
@DrJudes03@DrJoelSchwartz@PDASociety It is logical to assume clinicians bias to PDA being an ASD, may impact how they diagnose a person who they believe has PDA. Unless you are arguing you, or other clinicians are also exempt from such biases?
@DrJudes03@DrJoelSchwartz@PDASociety 5) Your response also over reifies the knowledge base of clinicians and supposes that non-clinicians do not understand the diagnostic process. Although, I can point to other tweets of mine that would indicate that I do understand that process.
@DrJudes03@DrJoelSchwartz@PDASociety 6) "In addition, there is no scoring scheme to identify the requisite severity or pervasiveness of these behaviours" O'Nions, 2013, p84.
Which begs the question on what literature/ opinion Help4Psychology decided that PDA needs to be pervasive?
"the disturbance causes clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning." APA 2013, p21.
@DrJudes03@DrJoelSchwartz@PDASociety Which is actually quite low, it does not require a feature to be an issue in multiple settings or even be pervasive.
@DrJudes03@DrJoelSchwartz@PDASociety 7) “Professionals and teams working with children need to become aware of the ways in which girls can mask their difficulties, and need to move away from using the DSM as a ‘bible’...
@DrJudes03@DrJoelSchwartz@PDASociety ... Stating that someone does not fulfil criteria, when these criteria are based on upon a ‘male’ presentation of a disorder, is short sighted in the extreme.” (Eaton, 2017, page 176).
@DrJudes03@DrJoelSchwartz@PDASociety I generally accept the point that DSM-5 criteria are biased towards males & those not conforming to autism stereotypes. I do not really have any issue with Help4Pyschology using different criteria for autistic females.
@DrJudes03@DrJoelSchwartz@PDASociety The issue is that based on your own acknowledgement Help4Psychology make an autism diagnosis before it diagnoses PDA (which is a practice that intrinsically discriminates against non-autistic persons with PDA).
@DrJudes03@DrJoelSchwartz@PDASociety When one views PDA to be an ASD, one tends to locate features/ issues within the individual, & not transactional in nature. Some view PDA to be a female form of autism.
@DrJudes03@DrJoelSchwartz@PDASociety I suspect why Comfortable & Pretend trait did not cluster with other demand-avoidance traits in O'Nions (2013) is probably because the EDA-Q views PDA to be an ASD.
@DrJudes03@DrJoelSchwartz@PDASociety So Comfortable Roleplay & Pretend features were seen as fixed aspects of a person, not a coping mechanisms as Newson suggested. Presumably those features should cluster with demand-avoidance traits if one takes a transactional approach to PDA.
@DrJudes03@DrJoelSchwartz@PDASociety The point I am trying to make here, is that we cannot be sure that Help4Psychology views PDA is an ASD, has not impacted how it makes an autism diagnosis in those it believes have PDA, as it is likely PDA features are conflated with DSM-5 autism ones.
@DrJudes03@DrJoelSchwartz@PDASociety Help4Psychology seems to have no issue not strictly following DSM-5 autism criteria when it thinks it is appropriate. The clinic diagnoses PDA when it is not in the DSM-5.
@DrJudes03@DrJoelSchwartz@PDASociety As Help4Psychology diagnoses autism, before it diagnoses PDA, is going to contain autistic females who do not conform to the DSM-5 criteria. Presumably these individuals are in both autism & autism with PDA groups.
@DrJudes03@DrJoelSchwartz@PDASociety Likewise, if PDA features are being conflated with DSM-5 autism criteria, it is likely to impact how Help4Psychology diagnoses autism, across the entire gender range, as PDA features are seen across the entire autistic population.
@DrJudes03@DrJoelSchwartz@PDASociety Bottom line is we cannot be sure how many those diagnosed with PDA by Help4Psychology actually meet the DSM-5 criteria. One could probably argue for any autism diagnosis from Help4Psychology.
@DrJudes03@DrJoelSchwartz@PDASociety There is probably an issue of over reporting autistic persons with PDA across the PDA literature since 2011, due to this fallacy that PDA is an ASD.
"Care Across Contexts: Ethics of Care and Relational Leadership Increasing Efficacy of Interventions for Disabled and Neurodivergent Learners"
Free to access Masters thesis arcabc.ca/islandora/obje…
I should warn people it discusses the use of ABA!
Beyond this, is this bit discussing PDA. From my perspective, is all the assumptions around this are problematic & worrying about where did the author find information providing such biased information?!?!?
At some point in the future, a committee, will decide if autism subtypes will be accepted again. Such committees are often open to political lobbying, e.g., lobbying by Autistics to exclude subtypes from DSM-5.
Unless others boldly claim you experience demand-avoidance differently to them, then apparently it is fair game to claim you do not have PDA.
Unless demand-avoidance is not an Autism feature?
In which case how can PDA be a "Profile of autism"?!?
No, autism is not centrally defined by demand-avoidance!
Yes, this is some of the fallacious logic (& claims) I have to deal with some from others.
It is an issue. Not only due to the distress such claims are causing me. Also due to issues those & others actions are having to those not blindly accepting "PDA Profile of ASD".
Next videos I wish to make:
Why I use a "post-Autistic" identity.
Commentary that those using problematic & controversial diagnoses have some ethical responsibility.
When will "PDA Profile of ASD" advocates stop their attacks: before, or after their attacks drive someone to suicide?!?
Last issue is bothering me a lot. Not only due to the effects of their attacks on me. Also that their is a pattern in their behaviour. One can reasonably label a dangerous group (ironically, how they label some critiquing PDA).
One would think after:
@milton_damian threatened to take legal action against Sally Cat for a defamatory petition which had 700+ responses in 48 hours in 2018.
Their attacks against Harry Thompson, apparently made HT heavily suicidal in 2023.
...
"Facing Change and Uncertainty: Lessons Learned from Autistic Children and their Families During the COVID-19 Pandemic"
Open access article link.springer.com/article/10.100…
This is one is interesting talking about demands. It also seems to talk about how avoidance is relating to anxiety (stress). There is also an example of demand-avoidance in their which highlights why proposed rational-irrational demand-avoidance split is problematic.
This one p9. It discusses how some children avoided demand to learn/ do education activities at home. While it is positioned as "refusal", it is a form of demand-avoidance. One can question if demand-avoidance is rational, or irrational in nature. Answer is subjective!
@milton_damian Does anyone else find it weird considering the high variation in clinical practice assessing autism; that "PDA Profile of ASD" advocates felt the need to prematurely define with a research report, that purports to provide guidance & identification on PDA?
Point here, is one can respect autism identifications from clinics with divergent assessment practices. Why should PDA identifications be treated any differently (if they do identify PDA)? Why should we view divergent PDA identifications as inferiors to others?
Highlight how weird it is some decided "their" PDA identifications better than others.
Suppose those clinics who have supposedly been over diagnosing PDA, got together produced a report on how to assess/ identify PDA & said all "PDA Profile of ASD" identifications are not PDA?!