Stephen L. Miller Profile picture
Aug 1, 2021 6 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Also Bill Kristol's website endorsed Mandel. We're like on several meta levels about "yes how did we get here." It's a miracle.
Reminder that these are the people who constantly lecture what the GOP should be while ignoring their own role in what it has become. Sykes, Swift, Kristol.. It's all about distracting MSNBC long enough so they don't turn and look at their own role in Donald Trump.
When that happens, the money gets cut off. It's as simple as that.
Bill Kristol literally thinks you're too stupid or uninformed to know or remember that Josh Mandel was his personal guy. Jim Swift, who screenshots everyone but like, himself, worked for him. They want you to ignore this. This is the Bulwark's entire gig.
"Trump is the problem but hey don't look at us for all these Trump like people we recruited and worked for."
--> @BillKristol @JimSwiftDC

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen L. Miller

Stephen L. Miller Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @redsteeze

Jun 21
Image
Image
FYI there are like literally 50 of these pieces I could choose from to do this contrast post.
Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Jun 15
As Bulwark writers try to gaslight in my mentions, it's a fun time to remind people that it's a 501c3 funded by progressive donors that also tries to use things like movie reviews and food recipes to cover for that.

And any person who voluntarily participates in that exercise knows exactly what they're doing, even as they try to distant themselves from that kind of craziness. Cash those paychecks,
Substack could use more great movie reviews. Without all the political ickiness
cc @redlettermedia
Read 4 tweets
May 16
Seems pretty newsy that it's all being revealed the President of the United States was an invalid, and while he was in office, Russia invaded Ukraine and will bog us down for years because of it.

Feel like these are the questions currently being ignored.
Seems pretty newsy that we're learning the President was senile during a catastrophic withdrawal from Afghanistan that saw 13 service members killed and the Taliban back in control.

He took 6 questions in 4 years about it.
This is why the media's role in all of this cannot be washed away after a couple of books.

It's why "Just a couple of aides we aren't going to name" isn't good enough and it's why all of these people need to be hauled in front of Congress.
Read 6 tweets
May 9
The opposite is actually happening. The right was calling out the lack of media coverage on Fetterman while he was running and babbling nonsensically through a debate.

The right isn't *defending* John Fetterman. We're just asking about the curious, sudden timing, and neither Chait nor anyone else can answer how he's changed from 2022, to now.

It's about Israel, and EVERYONE knows it. Chait and the media are the ones who have to explain why they didn't cover his health back then, but are so eager to do so now.
All they have to do, Kara Swisher in particular, is answer what's the difference between John Fetterman from 2 years ago, and John Fetterman now.

They won't do it.
No one on the right is actually saying, "John Fetterman is sharp and fit behind closed doors."

We're just noticing the obvious hit job against him.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 13
I think I know what her angle is. Image
Image
Image
Image
A Bloomberg reporter replying to random unverified anonymous social media accounts on any mention of 401K. Not exactly Lois Lane over here.
Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 7 tweets
Feb 6
Federal employees being completely lost in the dark policy-wise without being informed by whatever Politico is publishing is the tell of all tells here.
"How will federal agencies direct policy without Politico's invaluable directions?"
So we're clear here, this is a progressive journalist admitting that they believe their job is to shape how policymakers think in federal agencies, on things like abortion, climate, etc.. and without them, these employees would be lost in the woods.

It's a confession. Not an explanation.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(