Weirdest thing I remember about learning languages at school
was how keen the textbooks were to make the country you were learning about seem completely atomised and boring. They presented the reward for years of learning as access to a sanitised suburb with no history or culture
Maybe that's helpful and too much difference will scare off the median kid from learning anything. But then what could possibly be the point given we have sufficient access to deracinated blandness as it is?
Everyone has their own "fix society with schools" thing that doesn't work but it is really noticeable that kids at the more comfortable end of society get exposed to so much more of the world than their mainstream counterparts, and it seems to benefit them a lot
The world is enormous and varied, there are many ways to live a successful life and the more of it you see the more likely it is that you spot a place for yourself
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
More convinced that "social classes are sticky / fuzzy cultural adaptations to economic positions" is basically right, having seen people switch economic positions and develop new cultural norms similar to other groups in their economic position, even if the groups don't interact
Not surface-level culture like tastes in food or music or clothes etc, those things change all the time and don't mean much, but norms and attitudes which may not be explicitly acknowledged- like attitudes to work, interests, money, status, relationships etc
Taiwan has pretty generous visa and tax arrangements for people who are relatively high NW and willing to move, so in Taipei you meet international people who made enough cash in bigcorps to not *need* to work anymore, and who are adjusting to that new economic position
The border belief described here was incredibly powerful and wormed its way around institutions the world over. The pandemic preparedness index ranked you *less* prepared if you had previously closed borders in the event of disease outbreaks
The WHO had measures to *prevent* border closures in the event of disease outbreaks written into the international health regulations, and even built tools to track outbreak-related border restrictions, so they could lobby to get them removed thelancet.com/journals/lance…
There's a good essay in the psychological/social condition (rather than just the direct economic position) of smart upper middle class young adults, and why Altman observed founders disproportionately coming from that background
Obviously by definition there are very few "super successful" people so it could still be that their offspring have an even bigger advantage than the UMC kids and it's obscured by their scarcity, plus thanks to homophily Altman is gonna know more UMC people anyway but
It does seem like UMC kids have some unusual advantages in building new things even beyond what you'd expect given their economic status (can afford to risk a career year on a new biz, likely to have savings, not supporting parents financially, good education to fall back on etc)
We're emerging from a pandemic where we learned that national science teams can make bad calls due to groupthink and cultural baggage, and we've put in place mechanisms (banning "anti-science" people from social media) to make it *harder* to disagree with them in the future
In April 2020 twitter and FB started banning accounts which encouraged people to break virus rules or (more loosely enforced) challenge established virus science. It's been escalating a bit since then with youtube joining in too
Some of the ideas they are penalising now were the established Western consensus early in 2020, like encouraging people to get infected for herd immunity or saying masks don't work- both presented to UK ministers as "the science", now memory-holed thanks to medical sacredness