With only nine or so vaquitas left in Mexican waters with little control on deadly nets set for a black-market fish, silence is replacing this tiny porpoise's vocalizations. Extinction looms. But the next 6 weeks can make a real difference. Read. Share: revkin.bulletin.com/41778589089738… 1/
Last week I was poised to write game over - that the conservation community should conserve resources for other efforts. I'd kept track via my @nytimes#dotearth blog for years, as numbers plunged from a couple hundred to a handful. China, particularly, seemed immovable. 2/
But in an interview last week, longtime vaquita scientist Barbara Taylor of @NOAAFisheries laid out four compelling reasons why a last-chance porpoise protection push is justified. The remaining handful of vaquitas are wary, fat and healthy, and not genetically bottlenecked. 3/
There's a funding gap of just $178,000 or so - ponder in the context of what billionaires have been spending money on lately - to get 2 vessels on the critical, and largely unprotected, "zero tolerance" core of the vaquita refuge when illicit fishing resumes mid September. 4/
And that's why I just donated to cetact.org, which I'm told is the most direct route to funding crew time to get two vessels on the waters off San Felipe this fall. It shouldn't be hard to raise $178,000 to give the last 🐬🐬🐬🐬🐬🐬🐬🐬🐬 a chance. Here's why..⤵️ 6/
There's no ideological divide. Indeed, the need to save the vaquita may in fact be the only thing that both @LeoDiCaprio, a key force behind the @seaofshadowsSOS film, and right-wing radio host Michael Savage of @ASavageNation agree on. LISTEN here. 🔊 7/
There's lots more in my story, "A Porpoise at the Precipice," on my new #bulletin dispatch, #sustainwhat: revkin.bulletin.com/41778589089738… Please subscribe and share, and do consider donating to the organization above, as I did. 8/
1. I actually don't think there's as much disagreement here as it might seem. Clearly @MatthewCappucci is not blaming the girls or their counselors. But - clearly - the multi-million-dollar for-profit camp will own a substantial part of the responsibility for the scope of human losses. As the @Nytimes vividly reported, the $5-million expansion of the camp along Cypress Creek did not include relocating vulnerable cabins along the Guadalupe (there's way more from @AndrewRumbach and others on this elsewhere revkin.substack.com/i/167764976/ca…). ⤵️
2. Boosting community resilience to natural - and unnatural - hazards) is, like so many issues today, a systems challenge, as @oldscarf1stweek says. But it's clear in disaster-risk-reduction circles that, particularly for hyperlocal threats like this kind of flood or tornadoes, the "last mile" is, too often, where the gap between warning and response exists. @oldscarf1stweek is spot on that more must always be done by professionals (#EMG professionals, @NWS community outreach staff (those unfilled positions...), local meteorologists and media, social media and telecomm folks, and of course local elected officials). But that includes property owners too. ⤵️
3. As for when accountability should be explored, there's a longstanding debate. It'd be great if the country had a National Disaster Review Board, as I and others have long argued. But we don't, meaning the press and experts like Matt have to dive in, and - yes - sometimes doing so when audiences outside of a particular disaster zone are tuned in. @paulkrugman just wrote a piece worth reaading on this (I think the headline is flawed because it's not *just* about politics, but the issues are well described): "When it comes to disasters, accountability delayed is accountability denied." paulkrugman.substack.com/p/should-we-po… ⤵️
“It’s like pitching a tent in the highway... It’s going to happen, sooner or later — a car is going to come, or a big flood is going to come.” - Anna Serra Llobet, quoted in a powerful @nytimes deconstruct of the built vulnerability at Camp Mystic. Story link below. 1/
She's been at this a long while. See below.
2. Camp Mystic Cabins Stood in an ‘Extremely Hazardous’ Floodway - @ByMikeBaker @merlerker @harrys_stevens @TmarcoH in @nytimes nytimes.com/interactive/20…
Surreal but real report from @HannahAllam at @propublica recalls my '06 reporting showing that 24-year-old Bush appointee George Deutsch was trying to muffle @NASAGISS climate scientist @DrJamesEHansen. (Fugate Instagram reel). But the @DHSgov move is potentially way more consequential. (And don't miss the part where Team Trump has cut the CP3 office from 80 downt to 20 people.) 1/
Here's the 2006 outcome: George C. Deutsch, the young presidential appointee at NASA who told public affairs workers to limit reporters' access to a top climate scientist and told a Web designer to add the word "theory" at every mention of the Big Bang, resigned yesterday, agency officials said.
Mr. Deutsch's resignation came on the same day that officials at Texas A&M University confirmed that he did not graduate from there, as his résumé on file at the agency asserted. nytimes.com/2006/02/08/pol… 2/
Subsequent 2007 hearing on Political Influence on Climate Change Research (don't count on any oversight this time around) c-span.org/program/house-…
☕ Case study in how to read coverage of new science on perennial issues (nutrition, climate change, pandemic, etc...) and avoid the #whiplasheffect.
Stick to the basics and avoid the media #singlestudysyndrome habit of snagging your attention with a new study (new science is almost *always* tentative). 🧵
Example: That Cup of Coffee May Have a Longer-Term Perk / A new study of over 47,000 women found links between coffee drinking and healthy aging. Here’s what we know. by @alicegcallahan @nytimes nytimes.com/2025/06/02/wel… 1. Not peer reviewed (peer review isn't a gold standard but is a valuable barometer). Of course, we journalists are in a bind. Embargoed press releases are dangled, papers are presented at meetings you're attending. Someone else will write it if you don't. Alice does a good job...
My 2008 @nytimes story on the #whiplasheffect in frontier science - and media coverage: When science is testing new ideas, the result is often a two-papers-forward-one-paper-back intellectual tussle among competing research teams. nytimes.com/2008/07/29/sci…
When the work touches on issues that worry the public, affect the economy or polarize politics, the news media and advocates of all stripes dive in. Under nonstop scrutiny, conflicting findings can make news coverage veer from one extreme to another, resulting in a kind of journalistic whiplash for the public.
This has been true for decades in health coverage. But lately the phenomenon has been glaringly apparent on the global warming beat.
Just learned from reliable source that a small but effective unit helping boost capacity for resilient development has been X-ed by Musk/Trump (and the university: @ccb_boulder at @INSTAAR at @CUBoulder. 1/
This work at the interface of climate / weather science and place-based behavioral / social science was always tough to sustain. Way back, when @MickeyGlantz was at @NCAR_Science, his job was X-ed. My coverage of that cut in 2008 helped get Mickey and his initiative moved to @CUBoulder. He was poised to retire at age 85, but many young researchers are now facing grim futures. gift link: nytimes.com/2008/08/07/sci… 3/3
Great to see #songwriter @jesse_welles get his @nytimes moment! Gift link below #fastfolk 1/
2/ Nice @DavidPeisner profile catches @jesse_welles in the studio in Nashville and builds a fine sketch of his hockeystick track - a tough label-driven grunge slog and now spare fun mixing off-the-news broadsides and writerly tunes. (no paywall) nytimes.com/2025/02/12/art… I see Welles as an update to the #fastfolk movement I wrote about in The Times in 1999...