5 years ago, the Crossfire Hurricane investigation was opened.
It was problematic from the start: the same agent, Peter Strzok, drafted, approved, launched and supervised the investigation into a political campaign 4 months before the election.
Why was there no oversight?
It was problematic from the start: the same agent, Peter Strzok, drafted, approved, launched and supervised the investigation into a political campaign 4 months before the election.
Why was there no oversight?
2) The Russia collusion investigation was opened based on an alleged “suggestion of a suggestion” by a junior campaign advisor passed through informal channels, i. e. a rumour about a rumour.
Yet somehow the whole campaign leadership ended up being investigated.
Yet somehow the whole campaign leadership ended up being investigated.
3) Although the public was told that the information used to launch investigation came from a Friendly Foreign Government, the opening document (Electronic Communication) show that the tip came through informal channels.
This is a breach of the Five Eyes intelligence agreement.
This is a breach of the Five Eyes intelligence agreement.
4) According to Kevin R. Brock, former FBI assistant director of intelligence:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
