THREAD. Following similar efforts around the country, NYC police have launched yet another shameful and violent offensive: removing people from where they live to "clean" the city for wealthy business interests. A few thoughts: nytimes.com/2021/08/02/nyr…
First, take a look at the language bureaucrats use to describe what NYC cops are doing to people who are living on the streets: the violent cops are called "cleanup crews" for "service-resistant individuals."
Second, cops with guns are forcibly moving people (with no regard to the destruction of their most valuable and sentimental possessions) to group barracks in the middle a resurgent delta variant coronavirus and against CDC recommendations.
Third, the article masks wild fear-mongering as legitimate: that homeless people are "menacing passers by" and committing "random assaults." It uses vague words like "complaints" and "public outcry" to mask what's happening: pre-engineered strategy for business and real estate.
Finally, always look at what "business leaders" say: "I don’t think persuasion is going to get people off the streets." There is a direct line from what wealthy capital wants to what the cops do. The wealthy understand the violence needed to keep people in poverty.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alec Karakatsanis

Alec Karakatsanis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @equalityAlec

4 Aug
UPDATED THREAD. You're going to hear a lot about how cops need more resources because "crime is surging" in the next few months. It's propaganda, and here's how you can respond:
First, what constitutes a "crime" is determined by people in power who have a lot of money.
Second, cops manipulate crime stats for political reasons. Cops don't even count the *violent and sexual crimes that cops commit,* which would entirely reverse the crime stats in every city and state.
Read 23 tweets
30 Jul
A humanitarian crisis is unfolding in Texas: Governor is illegally kidnapping human beings, separating families, demanding cash for their release, and setting up unconstitutional concentration camps for immigrants who can't pay. Biden is doing nothing. texastribune.org/2021/07/30/tex…
This is a good example of our culture's desensitization to the most profound injustices of the authoritarian punishment bureaucracy. To do this, Governor needs thousands of officers, prosecutors, retired judges, jail guards, aides, bureaucrats, etc... Everyone goes along.
When the history of this period is written by those who are organizing against it, all of the people who created the greatest human caging bureaucracy in modern history and used it to cage the poor, people of color, immigrants, and other vulnerable people will be held accountable
Read 4 tweets
16 Jul
A few thoughts on Boston police: Boston cops, after getting a record city budget in 2019, devised "operation clean sweep" in which a squad of cops had the goal of destroying the wheelchairs of homeless people with disabilities living on the street. boston.com/news/local-new…
Virtually the entire police bureaucracy in Boston hid the fact that the union president had been accused of child molestation, promoted him, and had him working on child sex cases. He was then accused of attacking five more kids. bostonglobe.com/2021/04/10/met…
The Boston police convince the City to lavish them with extra overtime cash every year--the overtime budget alone in Boston is 240 times the budget for the City's "Human Rights Commission." data.aclum.org/2020/06/05/unp…
Read 4 tweets
15 Jul
I've been thinking these last few weeks about how, the very next day after white cops beat John Lewis and hundreds of civil rights marchers on the Pettus Bridge in Selma, the President of the U.S. announced an unprecedented expansion in funding for U.S. police departments.
That expansion was predicated on the need to spend money on police "training" and the assertion that poor people and Black people were engaging in a wave of crime. Sound familiar? presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/spec…
Everyone paying attention knew exactly what and who the President meant by "crime" and "criminals." When powerful people talk about "crime" they are only talking about some of the harm that some people commit in some places some of the time. yalelawjournal.org/forum/the-puni…
Read 5 tweets
12 Jul
a strange thing is happening. the pro-police media, having *no evidence* that the greatest expenditures on cops and cages in modern world history leads to any semblance of safety, are now weaponizing a new argument: poor people and Black people supposedly *want* more police (1)
according to this hysteria, it's "elitist" to suggest that we shift resources from cops, prosecutors, and prisons to things like housing, treatment, medical care, violence interruption mutual aid, etc... these people are shameful. (2)
most of these media people have never worked in or with the communities most harmed by the carceral state. the polls they are citing are both highly manipulated and completely dependent on how the question is phrased. and it's all in the context of the media's own copaganda war.
Read 4 tweets
12 Jul
I don't think even Greenwald understands what he's saying anymore. What is the point of this? The biggest cop bureaucracy in world history needs more weapons and surveillance tech? Amazing he doesn't see the link between U.S. cops and cops who killed his friend Marielle Franco.
You can always find a few people willing to support forces of oppression. In fact, many in the media (like you) are contributing to the propaganda that causes this, and to the fact that jobs in the carceral bureaucracy are a huge source of economic wealth for many communities.
Greenwald explicitly treats calls for U.S. military invasion by small numbers of marginalized people in other countries very differently. In that context, he gets that there are complex economic and propagandistic forces at work--but on U.S. policing, he buries his head in sand.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(