Sarah Posner Profile picture
Aug 3, 2021 11 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Tucker Carlson is actually a late-comer to the American right's love affair with Viktor Orban. A thread (1/n):
As I reported in @newrepublic @typeinvestigate in 2019, Orban hired a Republican strategize to plot his return to power--and his later consolidation of power--in 2010. (2/n)

newrepublic.com/article/153276…
Then Orban hired a Republican lobbyist, in 2014, to burnish his image on Capitol Hill and in the US press. (3/n)

newrepublic.com/article/153276…
At the time, supporting Orban was considered a fringe position in the DC foreign policy establishment, and even in the Republican party. Dana Rohrabacher was the standard-bearer of this position. (4/n)
But thanks to the work of DC strategists and lobbyists--and the growing affection for Orban's "illiberal democracy" within the right *and* the religious right (more on that later in the thread), embracing Orban was increasingly becoming the mainstream position in GOP. (5/n)
Meanwhile, as I reported in @VICE @typeinvestigate in 2019, the religious right was also developing an admiration for Orban and other European autocrats. (7/n)

vice.com/en/article/a3b…
On the surface, it looked simply like shared ideology against LGBTQ and reproductive rights, broadly disparaged as "gender ideology." And yes, this shared oppo is anti-democratic, as in opposed to democratic values like equal rights. But... 8/n)
It was more than that. They actually also admired Orban's very successful efforts to dismantle democratic institutions--which helps us understand why they support same in U.S. (9/n)
I wrote about this in much greater detail in Unholy (penguinrandomhouse.com/books/605774/u…) (10/n)
Is it terrifying that Carlson is embracing Orban as TV spectacle? Absolutely. But to understand the effect this is going to have on his audience, it's also important to understand the groundwork has been laid for quite some time--making it ever more terrifying. (11/11-fin)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sarah Posner

Sarah Posner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sarahposner

Dec 5, 2022
This is not true. She filed the lawsuit before she made any wedding websites.
She was not taken to court. She filed the lawsuit to get exempted from complying with a non discrimination law. But the religious right loves to have the image of the Christian proprietor being hauled into court for her beliefs. But it’s simply not true.
ADF knows this — they represent her — but they retweeted Graham anyway.
Read 4 tweets
Dec 5, 2022
Read more about the lawyers representing the web designer in 303 Creative:

thenation.com/article/archiv…
Read 4 tweets
Dec 5, 2022
I finally read this piece today and it is so misinformed on facts, law, reality, history that I am shocked that it ran, even as "opinion."
To wit: the opening anecdote suggests that her church or her kids' Christian school might lose their tax exempt status because of their stance opposing marriage equality. 2/x
First, this has not happened once in the 7 yrs since Obergefell.
Second, despite all the fear sowed by the right that this would be like Bob Jones, recall that even though SCOTUS ruled in the govt's favor, the IRS abandoned enforcing that policy, and... 3/x
Read 26 tweets
Nov 19, 2022
I’d been on an airplane.

I just read the piece. I have some thoughts, which I will collect.
So. I know Rob, and he has been a source on a few stories I’ve written.

I understand how shocking this particular story — along with a couple of others recently, in which he describes his efforts to shape how SCOTUS justices thought about and wrote decisions. 1/x
Plus the efforts to connect SCOTUS justices with his stealth missionaries who would help shape their views. 2/x
Read 20 tweets
Nov 14, 2022
I just read the New York Times piece raising doubts about gender-affirming care (although the article doesn't call it that). This graf shows just how unaware the writers and editors are of the political/religious movement behind the effort to deny trans people their rights:
(Here's the link to the full piece: nytimes.com/2022/11/14/hea…)
I've been covering the religious right assault on trans rights for years. It's driven not by science or medicine, but by political activists who sought to sow a panic about trans people, a tactic that gained steam after SCOTUS ruled for marriage equality in 2015.
Read 14 tweets
Oct 25, 2022
I read NYT story this morning and tried (unsuccessfully) to dissect the sourcing. This is illuminating (and infuriating that NYT elides or obscures this)

Two Witnesses the DoJ Wants to See Cooperating Share One Thing. And That’s a Problem., by @nycjayjay open.substack.com/pub/statuskuo/… Image
@emptywheel It's not ok to obscure the identity or interests of your sources to such a degree that readers have no idea that someone with multiple conflicts and motivation is main or only source for your story that is basically non-news but shapes the narrative
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(