Karam Bales Profile picture
Aug 4, 2021 47 tweets 16 min read Read on X
🧵Long Covid in Children, the UKs impact on the global debate on schools and covid.

Today we see a perfect example

The Zoe study comes out and hits headlines, many outlets are stating this is proof we don't need to worry about long covid in children
2/ Its interesting to see studies and statements make it into the headlines and which don't.
When ONS data said the long covid rate was around 8-12% depending on age, that didn't recieve the same level of attention and those who reported it cast doubt on the numbers.
3/ Some UK studies and stats gain a lot more attention than others, some are treated as fact others are presented with doubt.

Most international research on schools and children seems to be wilfully ignored

Remember hearing about a 2 day science summit on long covid?
4/Well there was one, the level of research and detail presented at the conference was of the highest quality, evidence was carefully studied, limitations of different research were pointed out.

This doesn't happen with the headline studies in the UK
5/ Seriously take a look, it's amazing how much the scientific community is learning after such a relatively short period to study this virus, but a lot is still unknown, particularly around Delta.
6/ Study was before Delta, however there are other issues for instance how long covid was defined and identified in the study.
7/ This comes off the back of reports last week that a trial into daily contact testing showed transmission didn't occur in schools and that contacts who would have gone on to isolate didn't end up testing positive.

This was a reheat of headlines covering the DCT the week before
8/ The DCT were riddled with issues, participation was patchy, there were gaps in the data, the study itself concluded that it only referred to low transmission and this was during delta

Details on the DCT study here⬇️
9/ Another study with multiple issues heralded as a "major study" the usual characters coming out to say how brilliant it is while not addressing the flaws.

Image
Bloody typo
This WASNT during delta Image
10/ What then happens and is probably happening right now is

Ppl come out to criticise the report
Certain group defending the report then accuses the critics of criticising them

The debate degenerates, public get confused and flaws in the study go unaddressed by its defenders
11/ This is exactly what happened last month when child vax was debated, long covid was questioned and there was a lot of talk about unknown long term risks of vaccines
12/ When one of the takeaway arguments for defending the Gov/JCVI decision by some.of their advisors and researchers is that infection is better than vaccination for young ppl, you have to wonder what impact that has on hesitancy
13/ We ended up in a position where anti vax groups are platformed and have their messaging repeated by others across media.

The kind of ppl who celebrate younger ppl refusing the vaccine
Image
14/ As JVT announces vaccination for 16-17 it will be interesting to see how those who defended the original decision respond, has the evidence changed that much in a few weeks?

Notice Green Book was mentioned, this is what it currently says about infections in children Image
15/ As predicted, criticisms of the report are being responded to with criticism of others like tgise done by the ONS which has come to a different decision.

16/ Listening to LBC and Nawaz is quoting Ladhani's recent piece in the Times "Parents do not need to worry, children will not be taking the infection home and won't infect family members"
17/ As I said its interesting which studies get the headlines
In winter pre delta, ONS found children were most likely to be the index case, this study was dismissed outright by usual characters and is never mentioned by the media
18/ Ladhani has been quite prolific in claiming long covid isn't an issue for children, Deepti's challenges have become a regular part of my TL
ImageImage
19/ The usual characters dismiss any evidence that we should be worried about transmission, while anything which suggests don't worry is sold as brilliant major studies, they appear increasingly reliant on their own studies

These get the headlines.
20/ Criticising these studies results in having to face a lot of crap.
21/ But the bias of reporting has been constant throughout the pandemic.

Transmission data during lockdown shows classes of 30 will be safe
ONS data showing education staff were at increased risk presented ad though there was no risk

So many examples
22/ I was in a meeting yesterday with representatives of mainly academic organisations from around the world
UK data collection, particularly ONS combined with NHS/PHE is considered world class, the same data the usual characters are so quick to dismiss in favour of their own...
23/ is really highly respected.

There was another study released in England that found that Delta risk to unvaccinated children shouldn't be ignored, how many headlines do you think this one will get in the UK?
24/ The UK political narrative is having an impact around the world.
Denmark are considering schools returning without basic measures, in Alberta and BC in Canada the same is occuring as are certain US states. Image
25/ And which studies are the "let's open up and live with high transmission" politicians and advisors quoting? The ones being produced here in the UK mainly coming out of the same group, a handful of studies are doing a lot of heavy lifting around the world.
26/ Yet outside the "just live with it now" areas, those taking a more cautious approach (which is the majority) are putting more trust in other things like ONS data coming out of UK
27/ Of course passions run high in a pandemic when the stakes are high, can think of times when I could have chosen better worlds, there will be genuine differences of opinion on things like ZC for instance.

Although "progressives" in PH sounds a bit odd to me Image
28/ Theres clearly a dislike of Independent SAGE, although I think political lobbying group is a bit of a stretch of a description The Citizens provide a platform for iSAGE, they don't get involved in interpreting data or writing reports Image
29/ I mean a real dislike of iSAGE, minimal transparency and accountability? Public broadcasts and q&a, iSAGE is very open, its not like they are having secret meetings with MPs behind closed doors, if they are annoyed by iSAGE they must be furious about UfT's activities ImageImage
30/ After tone policing Deepti, likening her to anti vaxers for fear mongering, saying we need to look into iSAGE for what they see as campaigning, they surely wouldn't approve of a group proven to be coordinating in a network of disinformation groups... ImageImageImage
31/ Even if they supported such a group they might not be aware of the organising between groups, they wouldn't be chatting with those groups and passing one of UfTs main coordinators any research that might fit the lobbyists narratives ImageImage
32/ Because getting uptight and accusing a group that operates in the open of having an agenda while talking to groups with some very questionable links, views and tactics coordinating behind closed doors might make it look like attacks on others have an agenda of their own.
33/ I thought this was over after Johnsons "vectors of transmission" but then the DfE turned to ppl from the same group to justify its policies , they release more studies and somehow we are back to April 2020 narrative
34/ Without our paediatricians the Gov wouldn't have most of the evidence it needs to justify its policies, after all SAGE have been warning about the impact of schools on transmission and need for mitigations for a year+ now

Might have mitigations without these headline studies
35/ Isn't the whole reason we had to "go now" was because of the sweet spot of the "firebreak" school holidays?
Are we to believe that barely any of this transmission is occuring in schools?

Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm struggling to believe these statements
36/ Also wondering why we have set up 15 specialist paediatric units dedicated to long covid in children if its rare as is being claimed? Image
37/ As predicted, day after the Zoe study makes headlines, the ONS releases data saying approaching 40k children currently have long covid.

Notice this study is only getting a tiny fraction of the coverage the Zoe study did
38/ Update:
And a few days later. ImageImageImageImage
39/ On Friday a clinically vulnerable boy spoke at @IndependentSage about his concerns and how he'd like the choice to be vaccinated.

The trolls piled on and the boy has had to close his account due to the level of abuse

Some trolls have blue ticks
Image
40/ So what do the "protect the vulnerable" crowd actually want?
The same ones who kept claiming they care about young people’s mental health?

To pile onto a teenager for just voicing his concerns? Despicable.
41/ Meanwhile in the US...
CDC increasingly concerned about the impact of Delta on children.
42/ This is as paediatric hospitalisations hit record numbers in the states
43/ Indonesia is facing disaster due to Delta, their children aren't being spared.
44/ CDC also says that reinfection is twice as likely if you haven't been vaccinated, this is going to make building up immunity in young people more difficult than many are making out, even if they ignore long covid
45/ BTW if you want to see the kind of crap the boy who spoke at independent SAGE got⬇️

46/ And now we have an attack on independent SAGE

Retweeted by Lucy Johnson i notice , who has promoted UsForThem and T4Recovery. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Karam Bales

Karam Bales Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @karamballes

Jul 3
🧵A thread of links on Reform's general election
2/ Worth noting this other UK based coordinated disinformation network includes Together Declaration

Image
3/ Casting doubt on validity of UK voting process
Read 21 tweets
Jun 26
🧵Oh what a suprise, Together Declaration are part of this network, and members of the Exec like UsForThem founder Kingsley accused anyone who said they were a hard right political project of smears and defamation
Image
2/ Founded as anti-lockdown but going straight into anti-vax talking points, Together then switched to anti Ulez, anti net zero heading towards climate change denial
3/ They have been one of the main groups peddling nonsense about the WHO pandemic treaty, starting two years ago with Farage then becoming the leading face of a new astroturf group
Read 6 tweets
May 24
🧵The Covid in Schools Scandal

While much of the media claims the inquiry is accomplishing nothing, its slowly revealed the gov knew transmission occurs in schools and causes harm to a not insignificant number of children
2/ The much delayed testimony of Simon Case reveals that covid in schools policy ignored the science and was designed without expert advice

Macnamara
"Genuine suggestion that we secretly do different things in schools in places to see what the impact is.. last straw for me" Image
3/ Sunaks appearance revealed that the senior scientific advisors had warned that schools were the most significant risk to transmission

Image
Read 205 tweets
Apr 24
1/ Contrary to its name, changes in the Data Protection and Information Bill further shifts the balance of power towards commercial interests
2/ The bill gives the Secretary of State the power to add to the list of interests that can access your childrens data through secondary legislation avoiding parliamentary scrutiny Image
3/ The Bill also permits 14-18 year olds to be targeted with political marketing Image
Read 7 tweets
Apr 24
1/ The thing is, the UK is institutionally not curious about identifying harms directly caused by covid

For instance it's been a year since they stopped collecting and publishing data on long covid
2/ Many families of children with long covid have faced gaslighting and struggled to access meaningful care
3/ More and more evidence emerges of the long term harms caused by covid, but the UK govs preferred paedatricians continue to peddle claims that with enough infections children will develop lasting immunity
Said this would occur after 1 infection, what is it now? 5? 7? 10?🤷‍♂️
Read 15 tweets
Apr 11
🧵Cass Review
Not had a chance to read the whole thing yet, but have had time to look through the main points

What positives can be taken from it? The time spent on waiting lists was identified as a major issue, all children's services are massively underfunded at the moment
2/ I would like to think that this will lead to an investment in all children's support services like CAHMS, more pastoral support in schools etc

That would be a positive outcome, regardless of what else is included in the review, unfortunately real terms cuts are the reality
3/ What matters is how government interprets the review and what it chooses to implement, additional funding for children isn't going to be prioritised over tax cuts to appease RW papers
Imagine if the billions from last round of tax cuts had instead been invested in children
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(