ICU stories: Middle-aged pt with cirrhosis presented to the ED with abd pain and underwent Hartmann's procedure (colectomy - end-colostomy). Next am, pt was hypotensive on rising levo gtt (0.24 from 0.1) and ⬆️lactate (3.4 -> 6.7). S/he was positive 8 liters in 12 hours 😱
After reading the chart, I was almost certain that pt would be congested/fluid intolerant (after 8 liters+ fluid balance...). When I first walked in the room, BP was 90-100/30-40 (radial a-line), HR 120-130 and this is what the monitor showed:
I did POCUS: hyperdynamic LV, no pericardial effusion, RV OK, IVC very small (images not shown). I threw some color Doppler in the LV and this happened:
"A lot of color"! -> high velocity signals in the LV cavity and probably the LVOT. US windows not good (pt on the vent; subcostal views impossible given recent laparotomy), so I tried some continuous Doppler in the LVOT:
☝️Voila! A dagger-shaped signal with max velocity of 6 m/sec. I was not interested in finding exactly where the obstruction was. I bolused ivf, started vasopressin 0.04 and gave 5 mg iv metoprolol. In a few hours, lactate was normal and levo was ⬇️by 2/3.
Patient seemed to benefit from being managed as one with LV outflow tract obstruction. I would have never tried iv metoprolol in a pt on industrial doses of pressors. In the past, I might have tried esmolol that can be dc/ed fast. POCUS makes us smarter at the bedside. To be fair
the initial monitor view gave me pretty much the diagnosis or at least raised my suspicion of it. Do you see how weird it looks? Do you see the 2 systolic inflections?
Let's look closer. The obstruction to the ejection of blood from the left ventricle creates the 2nd systolic peak
This is what happened after fluids were given and heart rate was controlled. The dynamic obstruction to ejection of blood from the left ventricle disappeared
Take home messages: 1. Looking at the arterial/CVP waveforms can be sometimes very helpful, in fact more helpful than the exact BP/CVP values 2. We should not automatically equate a positive fluid balance, even a significant one, with fluid intolerance or venous congestion
3. We should always consider LV outflow tract obstruction in hemodynamically unstable patients
DOI 10.1007/s12630-009-9174-y
Thanks for reading!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Mixed cardiogenic shock (CS) -herein classified as CS with at least 1 additional contributing cause of shock state- is common (& usually quite challenging to treat...)
20% of all shock patients admitted to contemporary cardiac ICUs have mixed CS
Besides this old-school approach
It's good to keep in mind the proposed "normal" hemodynamic compensation & criteria for mixed cardiac-vasodilatory shock:
Simplified approach to identifying mixed shock states in patients presenting with primary cardiogenic or vasodilatory shock in the cardiac ICU using invasive hemodynamic parameters:
40 yo male, previously healthy, referred to the ED post-CPR after documented ventricular fibrillation
(VF). Vitals & physical exam: OK. No family history of sudden death. No drugs.
Any concern from this 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG)?
What do you think the most likely concern/explanation is?
ECG shows sinus rhythm with prominent J waves in leads II, III, and aVF and V4 through V6. The height of the J wave was > 0.2mV (> 0.3mV in leads II, III, and aVF). The slope of the ST segment was horizontal in lead II and down-sloping in leads III and aVF
ICU (Central Venous/Arterial) Line Secrets - Part 3:
Following from where I stopped last week & if you are not already bored by parts 1 & 2, there are some additional points that may be worth noting
Here the (probably) final part begins:
41. If you think that the patient will need dialysis or right heart catheterization in the next few hours, consider placing a dialysis catheter or an introducer sheath from the beginning
42. Classical teaching is that we should never lose sight of the back end of the wire when advancing it. But - trust me - this complication still happens even in the best hospitals. Before calling Vascular or Radiology, you may still have a chance to save the day: get an x-ray &
ICU (Central Venous/Arterial) Line Secrets - Part 2:
Following from where I stopped last week (that's why I keep same numbering) & without hoping to a provide tutorial about how to place lines, there are some additional points that I find worth mentioning
21. Femoral vein (FV) catheters have been demonized. A recently published study of 55,663 CVCs showed no difference of catheter-related bloodstream infection incidence rates between the three insertion sites (). IMHO,doi.org/10.1007/s00134…
placing a FV catheter is perfectly fine especially if you anticipate the patient to experience a fairly fast clinical recovery (examples: a patient in diabetic ketoacidosis or urosepsis)
50 yo ♂︎ with no significant medical history presented to the ED after acute onset of sharp chest pain. No family hx of heart disease, & no tobacco or illicit drug use. Episode lasted ~30 min before pt arrived to the ED. He was pain-free with normal vitals. ECG:
Physical exam: no acute distress, & normal heart-lung exam. Labs sent & were all normal: CK, 193; CK-MB, 3.0; troponin T, 0.03. Patient remained pain-free for the next hour
What would you do next?
ECG had showed biphasic T waves in V1 -> V5. Patient underwent emergent cath which revealed a 95% stenosis in the proximal LAD that was treated with a drug-eluting stent...