2. Meadows introduced Trump to DOJ official Jeffrey Clark, who was plotting to oust the acting attorney general and use Justice Department to overturn election results in Georgia.
3. Meadows arranged and participated in call in which Trump asked Georgia Sec'y of State Raffensperger to “find 11,780 votes," and during the call Meadows asked the Georgia officials to share voting data even after they told him they could not because it was protected by law.
4. Meadows made a surprise visit to Georgia where he met with the Secretary of State’s lead elections investigator. Trump called her the next day — the president said it was on Meadow’s suggestion — and in the call urged her to find fraud in Fulton County.
5. Meadows expressed upset, along with Trump, in response to Attorney General Barr's having told the Associated Press there was no election fraud that could have affected the outcome in the election.
8. In barrage of communications with Justice Department—in violation of White House and Department contacts policies—Meadows pressured the Department to investigate baseless allegations of election fraud.
Here's a sample from the Timeline.👇
9/9. Capstone:
In his final days in office, Trump hopes to issue preemptive pardons for Meadows and possibly Giuliani and himself.
A time for choosing, from main street to wall street.
"This new threat is not about my testimony last June or about the renovation of the Federal Reserve buildings. It is not about Congress’s oversight role. .... Those are pretexts."
2/ "I have served at the Federal Reserve under four administrations, Republicans and Democrats alike. ... Public service sometimes requires standing firm in the face of threats."
3/ "I will continue to do the job the Senate confirmed me to do, with integrity and a commitment to serving the American people."
An initially-secret report for Customs and Border Patrol in 2013 found:
In many cases, the “driver was attempting to flee from the agents who intentionally put themselves into the exit path of the vehicle, thereby … creating justification for the use of deadly force.”
🧵
2/ I discuss this report at greater length on my YouTube channel and Substack
3/ "Applying even the OLC’s expansive view from its recent opinions to Operation Absolute Resolve, the Executive action clearly crosses the threshold for requiring congressional authorization."
WSJ report is extraordinary in implicating Mar-a-Lago in Epstein systematic sexual abuse.
It takes a close read, but looks like WSJ is reporting Trump was informed and told Mar-a-Lago manager to "kick out" Epstein in 2003 not from Mar-a-Lago, but from the Mar-a-Lago Spa.
With Admiral Bradley's lawyer speaking to Congress this upcoming week.
Threshold question is how ANY of these strikes are legal.
On Sept 2 strike: Q is whether they applied standard Collateral Damage Estimation Methodology.
Because look what it says (declassified 2012)⤵️ 1/
2/ The Collateral Damage Estimation Methodology goes to the heart of the latest DoD claims about the strike.
The claim is that the second strike was targeting the (possible) cocaine, not the shipwrecked.
I do not see how that could have possibly complied with the Methodology.
3/ As shown in the screen shot, the Methodology states:
The laws of war (LOW) require anticipated "noncombatant" deaths must not be excessive in relation to expected military advantage to be gained (the possible cocaine).