1/ I wouldn't recommend listening to this. I did thinking there'd be an apology. There wasn't and she refused directly when asked. I'm writing as I'm reading it. The overall take "it's more complicated" is empty when the complicating factors wouldn't change the interpretation
2/ It is contextualizing her as being scared of being alone with Christian Cooper adding context like she may be immunocompromised or she was sexually assaulted. There are also implications that the event was framed as racist *because* of #GeorgeFloyd
3/ (as if we wouldn't frame it as racist otherwise). A "smoking gun" is that "Mr. Cooper instigated the encounter" and that he's had similar encounters where he used dog treats to motivate people to leash their dogs. This was known before! If you believe he used these treats,
4/ you would also believe his aim (i.e., not to "threaten someone's life" but literally to get people to leash their dogs). Several times they repeat that "he was known to hold his helmet in a threatening way." If you assume that people are intimidated by black/brown men then
5/ he's basically just holding a helmet. An overall lesson they discuss is "the media doesn't cover things with nuance." No duh. Look at the way you all covered the consequences to Amy Cooper without equally attending to the potential consequences for Christian Cooper.
6/ The "contrarian" conclusion is that in the interest of fairness we are going too far ("a mob getting what they wanted"). This is not a contrarian opinion it's a tired trope. Ignoring that some of the reasoning is bananas (e.g., she became afraid when *he* appeared afraid)
7/ And, for some reason, they attempt to play it as if she had no idea about the history of race relations in the U.S. and the possibility that his life was under threat. (Charitably maybe she was responding as if she didn't know about the Emmett Till). Honestly, this just
8/ reassured me that Amy Cooper is probably a Karen and she'd do it again if she had the chance. In fact, she says something to that effect ("I had no choice"). Her first words to Christian Cooper? "You scared me."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lorenzo Lorenzo-Luaces, PhD

Lorenzo Lorenzo-Luaces, PhD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lluaces

14 Jun
Could you help get Aaron Beck recognized as the Google Doodle feature for his birthday, July 18?
Here’s what you can do: Submit a request to Google (which will probably take under a minute).
You can either cut and paste the message below and send it to doodleproposals@google.com
2/ or submit your own. Below:

I am writing to submit an idea for a Google Doodle for July 18th, 2021.

On July 18th the scientific, medical, and mental health communities around the world will celebrate the 100th birthday of Dr. Aaron T. Beck. Dr. Beck is globally
3/ recognized as the father of Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT), after developing the revolutionary therapy at the University of Pennsylvania in the 1960s. CBT has been found to be effective in treating a wide range of psychiatric disorders, psychological problems, and medical
Read 10 tweets
31 May
I think controls needs to be thought of in a more intentional way. It’s not “waiting lists are bad even if you call it care as usual” and “always use a psych placebo.” To be clear, the absolute response or remission rates are not higher in studies using
2/ weak controls or that the outcomes in psychotherapies behave differently in these trials. It’s that the more inert the control is the bigger the treatment-control difference is. This is not (just) a pedantic point because there are reasons to think carefully about the controls
3/ group depending on what the goals of your study are. Do you want to quantify the relative effects of introducing exposure to the common factors? Then yeah, to make a strong claim about this you would likely need to a bona fide supportive therapy control. But,
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(