Just to clarify.
This is the Nanopore coverage Map.
Lowest point in the trough in the center looks like 2,000X coverage.
Highest point on the right is ~500,000X coverage.
Obviously full length infective virus can’t be more than the 2,000X and the stuff on the right is non-infect
Non-infectious fragments of RNA known as sub genomic RNA or sgRNA.
Why would you place your PCR assay on the yellow region? You know you are predominately amplifying non-infectious RNA.
Deliberate witch hunting.
Should could target ORF1a (in the trough of the coverage map) that makes less subgenomic RNA but her sensitivity would drop ~200 fold.
But she’s only working with 6-5,800 copies.
Most of the data would be blank.
They’d have to speak for hours...
Into a vacuum tube.
Redonkulus
Interesting detail.
They did not Try to culture the coarse fraction (Over 5um).
That would have been very valuable information.
The diagnostic PCR does have low Ct but that’s PCR with diff assay/ diff lab/ diff time.
130L/min vacuum for 15-30 minutes.
Really shouldn’t say there is anything wrong with the paper....just seeing people use this as evidence for masking kids and it does not follow.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let play a game.
Can anyone make sense of these contradicting Pfizer-Regulator documents.
So the SV40 Promoter is not responsible for plasmid manufacturing.
But it’s the promoter for the Kanamycin resistance gene?
The documents submitted to the EMA show they use 50ug/ml of Kanamycin to replicate the plasmid.
How does that work?
No Promoter, no Kanamycin resistance..
No plasmid manufacturing?
They also claim the DNA has no functional consequences.
Moderna’s patents disagree.
Maybe dysfunctional consequences is a better term?
As health agencies assure the public that the DNA contamination is of no consequence, behind the scenes they are scurrying to have it removed from future vaccines!
No prior vaccine in Canada has been approved with such a sequence contaminant.
@FLSurgeonGen
Pfizer assured them the sequence is not material to plasmid manufacturing.
This is an overt lie.
You cannot make plasmids without the promoter for the antibiotic resistance gene.
It is active in mammalian cells.
If it’s not needed, why is it in there?
Regulators are asking for their PCR protocol.
That means they have performed ZERO checks on this DNA contamination themselves and are entirely relying on the word of the manufacturer.
They look at the Fluorometry data as well ask why 2 diff methods?
First order of business.
How do these authors make money?
Oh… by treating cannabis use disorder!
You need to associate cannabis with harms in order for society to believe they should pay for treatment.
The authors declare no conflict despite how blatant and overt this is.
It’s ironic that the authors are from an institution notorious for using violence against its patients.
Life threatening and traumatic restraints have killed patients under their care.
So now that we understand what these physicians are pimping let’s walk through their scam.
While a helpful high school version of biology,
Her statement about the 100% unidirectional nature of DNA was put to bed decades ago when we sequenced the human genome and found 8% of it coded for HERVs.
Most cell biologists also understand that when cells divide the nuclear envelope dissolves allowing cytosolic RNA and DNA to enter the nucleus.
In true form, the journalist never links to the paper.
Did you not realize that?
If you go digging for it, you’ll see it’s a non peer reviewed study designed to never find a 1:5000 event like myocarditis.
But one person died 4 days after vax and they chalked it up as coincidence.