#JustIn
IEBC has gazetted Election Campaign Contribution and Spending Limits for parties and candidates. Presidential Candidates may raise and spend upto Kshs. 4.4Billion. Nairobi Gubernatorial Candidates may raise and spend upto Kshs. 117Million. 1/9
Individual contributions must not exceed 20% of the prescribed spending limits. This is to avoid moneyed contributors single handedly financing and owning candidates and creating a possibility of quid pro quo post-election corruption. 2/9
Remember, all contributions and spending can only be done by IEBC authorised Expenditure Committees. Any money raised and spent outside the Expenditure Committee is ILLEGAL and constitutes an offence punishable by a fine of upto Ksh. 2M or 5yrs imprisonment. 3/9
The Expenditure Committees will be established by candidates upon being cleared by IEBC. It is therefore ILLEGAL to raise and spend campaign money outside the official Expenditure Period, which is the Official Election Campaign Period, commencing May 30, 2022.
4/9
There is a legitimate public interest in regulating Election Campaign Finance. While money is necessary to support candidate emergence, excessive use of money may have the twin potential of altering public choice processes and producing leaders of dubious integrity. 5/9
Article 88(4)(i) of the Constitution demands that IEBC regulates money spent by candidates in elections. Section 12 of the Election Campaign Finance Act requires IEBC to gazette spending limits. These provisions are self-executing and do not require any further Regulations. 6/9
This means Parliament cannot circumvent or subvert the law on Regulation of Campaign Contribution and Spending as they have previously argued. Parliament has always argued that in the absence of Regulations, IEBC cannot lawfully regulate campaign contribution and spending. 7/9
Interesting to note is that Parliament has sat on draft Election Campaign Financing Regulations since 2016, and has blatantly refuse to approve the Regulations as a way of defeating IEBC's constitutionally ordained mandate. In short, MPs do not want campaign money regulated. 8/9
Happily, regulation of Election Campaign Finance is not a matter left to Parliament's discretion to be complied with based on Members' convenience. It is a mandatory constitutional requirement deserving of enforcement, and IEBC must enforce even though the heavens may fall. 9/9
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
PARLIAMENT HAS NO POWER TO REJECT CAMPAIGN SPENDING LIMITS
Parliamentary Committee on Delegated Legislation is terribly mistaken to think that it has powers to countervail IEBC gazetted Election Campaign Spending Limits. It does not. 1/13
The operating law is S.18(1) of the Election Campaign Finance Act. Let the law speak:
"The Commission SHALL, at least twelve months before election, by Gazette Notice, prescribe spending limits that a candidate or party may spend..."
The operating word is "SHALL." 2/13
Further, S.29 on delegated powers provides thus:
"The Commission MAY make regulations for the better performance of its functions, and such regulations shall be laid before the National Assembly for approval before they are published in the Gazette." 3/13
[Thread] 1/ The BBI Report is a terrible anti-climax, and carries mixed results. This thread will interrogate those recommendations. Broadly, the recommendations do not reflect the urgency, influence and prominence that supported its mandate.
2/ The proposal to create the position Prime Minister is a huge PR exercise intended to alter the optics without meaningful drive towards political inclusion. The proposed PM is nothing more than a super CS drawn from the same government. This proposal must be rejected.
3/ The proposal that the runners up in a presidential election be the Leader of Opposition reintroduces the problem of personalization of power. Must be rejected. The present approach of second best performing party supplies the Leader of Minority in Parliament is more inclusive.