I know it may seem straight out of Curb Your Enthusiasm, but the supposed-racist-barrage-turned-innocent-fan-behavior this weekend in Colorado says a lot about the media.
I try to unpack why after some highlights from the unfounded outrage. ⤵️
For those unaware: over the weekend, a fan reportedly called an MLB player a racial slur. Not 24 hours later, the team concluded he was just calling out the name of the team’s mascot, Dinger.
But if you read the @nytimes, that the story was even in doubt likely escaped you.
But, as ever, it wasn’t just the Times. Not to be outdone, @CNN also got in on the act, making the same allegation.
Again, no hesitation, no couched language, no waiting for the story to play out with additional information. Just confident - and totally misplaced - assurance.
@washingtonpost really leaned into the narrative on this one.
As you can see from the opening paragraph (and h/t to @ChuckRossDC for finding this) there isn’t any equivocation: “The n-word was shouted multiple times from the stands”
That, simply, wasn’t true.
I think this story/correction from @AP is illustrative of the point here.
For the first tweet, you have certainty: a fan did this racist thing.
But then, as soon as the narrative went bunk, you get words like “suspected” start to creep in.
Where was that framing to begin with?
A lot of the updates took a similar route as APs.
Safe to say there’s a slight difference in tone between this original @USATODAY piece and the follow up one from when it became clear the first was wrong.
@NBCNews almost couched this but decided to go with “apparently” instead, and then leaned into how this was an “ugly incident” despite none of the players on either team noticing anything was amiss.
@BroBible is a name I never envisioned including in a thread if I’m being honest.
And the coverage even made it international! Here you’ve got @Independent from the UK and this truly outrageous take from @heraldsunsport in Australia.
Short on space but we saw the same thing from both the Post and @NYDailyNews.
The response from the @Rockies was pretty terrible.
How do you conclude, right off the bat, that your own fans are vile racists, without even bothering to investigate?
But even their self-flaggelating and inaccurate apology wasn’t enough for many on Twitter. Here’s just a brief snapshot of journalists and other blue checks. @rolandsmartin, @TroyWestwood & @mollyhc
Again, this is in response to an apology for something that didn’t happen!
And a lot of people across the media ran with this one when they should’ve known better.
Here’s @BNightengale, a sports columnists for USA Today, suggesting that this guy (who, again, didn’t do anything wrong!) should be put in jail.
It always pays to follow the @EsotericCD rule: when something outlandish happens, don’t rage tweet about it for twenty four hours.
@Phil_Lewis_ of HuffPost helped get the outrage going, in a since-deleted tweet.
Something tells me we’ll get a lot of quiet deletes and stealth edits as a result of all this.
I won’t pretend I had expected anything better from @KeithOlbermann, though.
Listen, I’m a Red Sox fan. I won’t pretend there aren’t racist incidents in the MLB (or other sports) or that they aren’t heinous when they happen.
But a quick way to turn people off to a problem is to play the boy who cried wolf. A lot of folks across the media did that here.
An earnest desire for change sometimes has a funny way of turning shadows into monsters. I hope folks will take this as a reminder to slow down, especially when something happens that is both outrageous and conveniently aligned with one’s narrative.
Especially in the media.
No, this isn’t Russiagate. It’s a dumb misunderstanding that’ll quickly recede from memory. But it is emblematic of an enormous problem with the corporate press.
Information that sounds right to a journalist is increasingly treated as fact, and we’re all poorer for it.
That’s the real problem here. We had uncorroborated information that - in the blink of an eye - became a story, reported in a uniform fashion across the corporate press.
If a story like this can take shape this quickly, what outrage mob can’t?
Also, accidentally posted an updated @nytimes story. The original was way worse.
Great work everyone.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The coverage of the anti-ICE riots in LA is perhaps the clearest example of advocacy “journalism” in Trump’s second term.
Reading the reporting, you would never know the most significant fact: the American people support Trump’s deportations.
Follow along ⤵️
First, the facts about the riots.
You’ve seen the burning cars, looting & clashes between police & protestors.
Demonstrators blocked the freeway, attacked ICE agents, all in an effort to prevent the deportations of illegal aliens. Trump deployed troops to allow ICE to operate.
As @MarkHalperin and @seanspicer discussed, the situation in LA is so tranquil that the mayor has instituted a curfew for the city.
The new book “Original Sin” from Jake Tapper & Alex Thompson recounts the effort to cover up Biden’s cognitive decline ahead of the election. The authors point to many guilty parties.
The one glaring omission? Their colleagues in the corporate press. Follow along ⤵️
There are numerous dramatic reveals. The Biden team considered condoning him to a wheelchair? Maybe in his fog he forgot about the border?
But as I worked on a review for @commonplc, the one thought that I kept coming back to was that you can’t tell this story without the press.
Perhaps no one was more vital to the continued fiction that Biden had it together than the media.
Tapper and Thompson even highlight some of the telling moments.
Biden’s cancer diagnosis is a tragedy I know first-hand.
But our sympathy can’t silence questions about Biden’s cognitive decline, clarified just days ago by the Hur tape.
The media tried to bury the story then. They’re trying again now.
I’ve got the receipts. ⤵️
When the report first came out in 2024, outlets rushed to demean Hur, accusing him of serving as a Republican hatchet man.
Just look at this take from @USATODAY, who assembled sympathetic voices to make the case that Hur “crossed the line.” They found an expert to call it a “disgrace” and then featured the obviously unbiased Eric Holder to lead a section titled “Way too many gratuitous remarks.”
The audio makes clear that Hur, if anything, played down how alarming the claims were.
(If you haven’t listened to the Hur audio yet, you should.)
It should go without saying, but the media cultivating this type of baseless hysteria about an admin for partisan reasons is much more of a threat to the underpinnings of our democracy than anything Trump has actually done.
Quick 🧵⤵️
A couple quotes:
“If you think that there’s this thing out there called America, and it’s exceptional, that means you don’t have to do anything” to stop fascism.
What? What does that even mean??
That if you, like millions of Americans!, believe in American exceptionalism…you’re a fascist?
Really?
“The powers that be can do whatever they want to you”
Trump can’t even deport people who have deportation orders against them without a federal judge stepping in.
Many in the media are trying to claim that the press was merely duped by Biden’s White House about the former president’s cognitive decline.
That simply isn’t true. The media actively took part in the coverup.
Don’t let them forget. I’ve got screenshots. ⤵️
I’ve done a number of threads on this but putting some of the most egregious stuff in one place.
Perhaps the most damming: Two weeks before the debate made Biden’s cognitive decline inescapable, @washingtonpost gave “Four Pinocchio’s” to allegedly edited videos showing Biden clearly displaying cognitive problems, dismissing them as “pernicious” efforts “to reinforce an existing stereotype” while quoting the White House to say the videos were “cheap fakes” — all to defend Biden against criticisms about his age and well-being.
That story came four days after a previous effort from @washingtonpost to write off these videos as Republican efforts to mislead voters: proof, the Post claimed, that “the politics of misinformation and conspiracy theories do not stop at the waters edge.”