Books are cool, but there's this whole weird culture of Performative Book Loving that makes me grit my teeth. It's been around for centuries (see: rich folks decking out their stately homes in books they never read), but social media has made it particularly insufferable
I do think it's at least partly a reaction to the Rise And Grind attitude of late stage capitalism – who wouldn't just want to lay around and read all day rather than working themselves to death? – but it's also clout-chasing
I see this a lot in image compositions on Instagram... it's this somewhat artificial maximalism of bookshelves, an uncanny valley of cozy reading nooks
Some "influencers" use the aesthetic and cultural caches of books and reading to drum up engagement and manufacture emotional responses. Not all "book lover" social media accounts do this! But lots with huge follower numbers do
And these huge accounts tugging on bibliophilic heartstrings can, ironically, make the lives of bookworkers more difficult. I am genuinely concerned for the librarian who made the weeding decision that Twitter is yelling about today
Bookworkers don't just wander into a library with the innate ability to manage collections and serve users. It's a profession. And they aren't perfect. But the social media outrage over that one picture is OUTRAGEOUS when you consider how little is known about it!
For all we know, the library in question HAD a book sale, HAD a free pile that sat around for months, DID try to donate the books that wound up in the dumpster
Just as "books are potent reservoirs for *so many* feelings" (thanks @melissa_hubbard !), this dumpster picture is being used as a reservoir for a lot of social anxiety, as well as a clout-gathering, virtue-signalling mechanism
Anyway holy FUCK I need to work, yell at me if I make any more tweets before 5:30pm
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The “o no a library weeded their collection! :’( what is this world coming to?” post has a similar vibe as that cop publicity stunt Little Free Library thing a few months ago. Both are manufactured emotional manipulation based on the IDEA of books rather than the REALITY of books
With the cop LFL incident, the idea of people taking books to sell was treated as abhorrent, immoral. The practice of weeding is seen in the same way. Neither view considers the people actually DOING the thing (taking books, weeding)
If people were desperate enough to raid a LFL to get a couple bucks from shitty used paperbacks, they were probably in a tight spot (if they sold them at all!! That’s just what the cops speculated happened!! Maybe they just wanted books!!)
“Mr Henry Martin’s book December 1854——Don’t steal this book my honest friend, for fear the gallos will be your end. For above you see the owner’s name”
Well this is an interesting outreach predicament… I’ll admit, some cutesy animal talk makes me cringe, but it’s usefulness in scicomm CANNOT be denied. Making a topic silly or cute can make it accessible
Particularly when you’re talking about snakes and spiders and other phobia-inducing animals that are (often) not looking for a fight and/or harmless, this cute-ification can help reduce the intimidation factor
This can (and has, to some extent) been applied to books, with frequent exclamations of "Absolute unit!" and "chonky," etc., and the professional pushback has been isolated