Here is your inflation scorecard. For context, as recently as two months ago people were speculating that we "might" get 3% inflation this year.
We've already had 4.1% CPI this year, if prices are flat for the rest of the year that's the annual inflation we'll have.
As recently as two months ago forecasters saw essentially no chance that core CPI would be 4% this year. Now it would take monthly prints slowing down from 0.48% to 0.13% (or a 1.6% annual rate) to keep inflation down this low.
Inflation moderated in July because the unusually large vehicles category moderated (as widely expected). The underlying inflation rate remained relatively strong. If core inflation continued at this month's rate for a year that would be 4.1% annual inflation.
(As an aside, the idea that vehicle price increases are just supply is implausible. They are partly supply but also a huge increase in demand due to stimulus checks, new car prices especially appear to reflect higher willingness to pay more than shortages.)
This is not base effects or transitory categories. The price increases we've seen have been widespread & not just a few freakish categories. Taking out food, shelter, energy and used cars/trucks (a standard BLS series), prices are above trend and rising faster than trend.
One way to see this is the comparison between the US and Europe. Using the comparable European methodology, the US has had annual inflation at a 3.3% over the last two years, Euro Area has been just 1.3%.
(My view: US too high and Europe too low.)
Finally, some shoes have yet to drop. Rent was really low again this month (+0.2%) and owner's equivalent rent also low (+0.3%). Overall shelter is below trend and likely to rise faster. This would be huge for the CPI and large for the PCE.
Using month-old data, a number of other rent measures are tracking much faster than the CPI. Some of this is conceptual differences (not all apples-to-apples) but some is that the CPI lags based on infrequent interviews to update.
And a policy-related addendum: I view inflation as primarily an issue for monetary policy (plus some supply chain untangling), not fiscal policy. I don't think the infrastructure bill or reconciliation plan would materially impact inflation over the next decade.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I will be enthusiastically supporting faculty legislation to cap the number of A's at Harvard at 20% (plus a bit). The collective action problem that has driven grades higher & higher over time is increasingly problematic. I hope other institutions consider similar steps.
I've talked to numerous colleagues & students about grade inflation. Almost all of them see it as a a problem. I've also heard about as many different ideas for solutions as I've had conversations. I would tweak this proposal in various ways. But would support it over nothing.
One place the current system fails--and it's not the only place--is honors. I'm on the Committee to recommend honors in the economics department. It's increasingly hard to distinguish excellence with so many A's. I believe that now even two A-'s makes you ineligible for Summa.
Depending on how you look at it growth in Q3 was very very strong or very strong or just possibly merely strong. Annual rates:
GDP: 4.3%
Real final sales to domestic purchasers: 2.9%
Average of GDP & GDI: 3.4%
GDI: 2.4%
A big part of the story was consumer spending up at a 3.5% annual rate. Started the year looking weak but new data and revisions have made consumers very strong.
Business fixed investment a bit weaker but also very heterogenous. Equipment investment and IPP up but non-residential structures down for the seventh straight quarter.
Several thoughts on that piece by @nealemahoney & @BharatRamamurti in @nytopinion.
1. They claim price controls are good politically. I'm very open to this being true, I'm under no illusion that what I think is good policy is particularly well correlated with good politics. But I am genuinely interested in more evidence beyond the brief observations they make.
2. They claim that even if you think price controls are a bad idea they can help you pass supply-increasing legislation that is on balance good. Once again, I'm open to this. And in government I've often done 3rd, 7th or 12th best policies because of constraints.