#atxcouncil Budget adoption meeting now underway. Mayor Adler says the meeting will start with ~110 public speakers before moving into an executive session to discuss items including city's Candlewood Suites purchase for shelter space and Nov. 2 election
First few public comments have been related to crime/APD budget and Candlewood Suites. After former Council Member Bill Spelman spoke about police staffing and homicides, CMs taking a minute to question him on current trends, potential fixes
Spelman told me last week the SAN ballot measure that would tie Austin to 2 police officers per 1,000 city residents--something city staff yesterday estimated could cost ~$54.3M-$119.8M annually--is a "well-meaning but terrible idea." Council will discuss the measure later today
CMs also spend some time discussing APD cadet academy curriculum review with speaker Kathy Mitchell. Sounds like some follow-up on that process could be coming from council
After a morning of public comment, council breaks for a 45-minute lunch. That will be followed some budget Q&A between council and staff--no hard decisions to be made--before executive session. More detailed budget talks and potential adoption to come later in the day
And we are back from lunch, staff starting with a budget presentation before. Interim Budget Officer Kerri Lang starts off detailing some staff amendments to original budget outline
And after some quick clarifications, council moves to executive session. They'll return this afternoon to work through budget items and Candlewood Suites purchase
Council is back from executive session, Mayor Adler says officials will look at election and Candlewood items on the agenda before getting to the budget. Sounds like they may work til late this evening and come back tomorrow
First up is Save Austin Now ballot proposition, including APD staffing requirement of 2.0 police officers per 1,000 city residents. City estimates this would actually require funding 2.13-2.35 officers per 1,000 to account for vacancies, cost $271.5-$598.8 million over 5 years
CM Kelly says she would vote in favor of adopting the measure immediately, but given lack of support across council they're now considering the addition of this item to the city's Nov. 2 election for voters to decide instead. Final language here: austintexas.gov/edims/document…
Laying out proposition language, Mayor Adler highlights "pretty significant problems" related to omission of initiative's "key features" including its potential cost. The city has added its cost estimate to this ordinance language, SAN had not yet referenced such a number
MPT Harper-Madison notes several resident comments on SAN's gathering of signatures for petition to get Prop A on the ballot. Notes that despite concerns, "we just can’t do anything" about removing peoples' names from petitions at this point
CM Casar asks for city CFO Ed Van Eenoo to speak on his estimates of the proposition's costs. Here's Van Eenoo's analysis of those requirements: austintexas.gov/edims/pio/docu…
Again, Van Eenoo says low end of Prop A cost over 5 years would be ~$271.5M, high end cost could be nearly $600M. Casar highlights estimate showing how annual high-end cost compares to other city department budgets (more than either Parks and Rec, EMS, Public Health)
Casar said the measure adding several hundred police officers could mean the city would lose: 400 firefighters + 400 parks and library staff + 210 EMS medics + 255 health & social service staff + 160 courts and other staff per year
Casar: "This is just a sense of just how big and just how devastating it would be to our budget" esp. regarding public safety
Casar also clarifies that estimate of staffing losses is based on proportional estimate of what ~$120M (high end annual Prop A cost) could total, rather than where actual losses may fall if proposition passes
CM Fuentes also references the $120M and how "staggering" cost could bring "really harsh cuts" to neighborhood resources, public safety. CM Pool agrees, says it's "fiscally irresponsible" and ties the city's hands indefinitely
CM Kitchen on Prop A: "It's not effective." Says the requirement of 2 officers per 1,000 residents does not target the city's safety needs
CM Ellis also says she has serious concerns over today's public testimony from residents saying they were misled when signing petition to get proposition on the ballot. "That's really unacceptable and not a part of our democratic process"
CM Alter says she sees the proposition as irresponsible in a fiscal, social, legal sense. Also says it could require the city to bump its tax rate up close to a maximum every year or face deep cuts
CM Renteria also calls measure irresponsible. Notes that cuts could affect funding for library, parks, swimming pools, rec centers: "That’s what’s keeping us safe"
CM Tovo says she agrees with Alter, believes measure is legally questionable and in conflict with city charter while tying the hands of city officials' budget planning. "I really want to make sure that anybody who is considering voting for it really well understands the budget"
Despite CM opposition, Proposition A is officially added to the Nov. 2 ballot in a unanimous vote
After brief discussion, the new Proposition B--not a homeless ordinance, but an ask of voters related to the sale or lease of 2525 S. Lakeshore Blvd. near Lady Bird Lake--passes with Casar and Alter abstaining, Fuentes off the dais). Language here: austintexas.gov/edims/document…
Mayor Adler now discussing the purchase of Candlewood Suites in Williamson County for homeless housing. Speaks to WillCo county judge, commissioner concerns over the site and purchase process, Austin's Summit Plan to house 3,000 people in 3 years ahead of council vote
CM Kelly says she's opposed to purchase and concerned the city has not adequately engaged WillCo/D6 residents. Also notes her resolution passed in June related to inter-county cooperation on homeless strategy has not received an update, and will not until late August
CM Kitchen also notes opposition to purchase, issues with WillCo communications, and CM Kelly's objections: "Moving forward with what is not the best option is not appropriate for us to do today and I’m disappointed that we’re doing that"
CM Casar notes his view on effectiveness of Austin's homeless hotel strategy, recent transitions of dozens to shelter/housing: "I want to continue seeing that strategy work here"
MPT Harper-Madison shares concerns about the purchase and agrees Candlewood is not the best location for permanent supportive housing. Also says some local fears and anxieties about the program may be "overstated" and hopes for better communication with WillCo in future
The WillCo Candlewood Suites purchase by city of Austin for homeless permanent supportive housing passes 7-4. CMs Kelly, Pool, Kitchen, Alter vote against
Council will now recess for dinner until around 7:15, sounds like around an hour of budget talks coming tonight
Council is back and sticking around until around 8:30 tonight. Harper-Madison kicks off this portion bringing up her $480K amendment to create a Northeast Austin District Plan. City staff in a memo earlier this year said necessary funding for such a plan ($1.08M) wasn't available
CM Fuentes up next and speaking to her 2 amendments: $957K for community healthcare workers and $63K for laptops in public libraries. Also speaking to proposed direction on displacement navigators, flooding resilience, TravCo interlocal agreement waiving childrens' library fees
CM Kelly speaks to her amendment and budget rider. First, asks for $85.6K public health position for educator to assist those experiencing homelessness keeping their pets. Second, an ask for an additional and modified police cadet academy in the coming year
CMs Ellis and Pool with 2 amendments each to note: Ellis has a request for a new team of park rangers and parks department maintenance. Pool asks are for rec center after-school childcare and funding for Workforce First program for people experiencing homelessness
After CM budget amendment and rider asks, tax rate talk closes out tonight's session. Some discussion over whether to slightly raise tax rate above 3.5% "no-new-revenue" rate increase to cover more council priorities or keep it at that level and cut homeowner tax bill further
Mayor Adler would support raising tax rate, and more money, to potentially leave some unallocated dollars saved for "bumpy times" for city budget projected over the years ahead
On that note: Fuentes welcomes more conversation along this line. Kelly "will not budge" on raising above 3.5% increase. Ellis says she's uncomfortable w taxpayers lose out on savings. Pool wants to "circle around" or at 3.5% level, also wants to make sure city spends all ARPA $$
Tovo says she wants to take a close look at any staffing bumps this year given uncertainty in years ahead. Harper-Madison wants to find a middle path and is also seeking to be more conservative given "dismal" outlook for coming years
Council recesses its meeting until 10am tomorrow

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ben Thompson

Ben Thompson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BThompson_CI

12 Aug
Continuation of yesterday's #atxcouncil budget meeting kicks off in a few minutes here. Yesterday's session saw some discussion of council budget asks and the potential direction council may take relating to the tax rate, in addition to a few additional agenda items:
Council approved the language and ordered elections for 2 propositions Austinites will vote on Nov. 2. The first, Prop A, comes from the Save Austin Now proposal to staff up Austin's police department to a level of 2 officers per 1,000 residents Image
The city estimates that could cost $54.3 million-$119.8 million on average annually over the next five years and bring hundreds of new officers to APD's force, if approved communityimpact.com/austin/central…
Read 45 tweets
10 Aug
Update from the city beginning now. Interim Chief Chacon starts with some updated numbers: 133 site visits, 86 separate sites, 1,290 tents/encampments identified through near the end of Phase 3. 605 people surveyed, "many more" were contacted by police
Chacon says "We continue to try to keep making arrests a last resort and finding alternative methods to accomplish Prop B implementation." Phase 4 could mean more arrests per city guidelines
Homeless Strategy Officer Grey now up, and starts by saying the city's HEAL initiative has brought around 110 people out of camps and into supportive bridge shelter. Also references yesterday's groundbreaking of Espero Rutland as housing progress communityimpact.com/austin/northwe…
Read 14 tweets
10 Aug
Austin is now in its 3rd day of the last outlined Prop B ordinance implementation phase; police can arrest anyone camping in public who refuses to move. Interim Police Chief Chacon and Homeless Strategy Officer Grey are providing an update on this process at 2:00 this afternoon Image
The city says the phase-in of Prop B’s public camping ban has seen 600+ APD officer visits with those experiencing homelessness throughout Austin. As of late last week: 572 written warnings, 24 citations, no arrests. 124 people connected with support services
Chacon said last week he expects voluntary camping ban compliance will increase moving forward, and we’ll hear more details on APD’s enforcement this afternoon. Chacon previously said APD would be reviewing the phased plan around its final stage to assess possible next steps
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(