TheLastRefuge Profile picture
Aug 11, 2021 45 tweets 12 min read Read on X
(1) When they say inflation will "spike" or increase this year, and then "come back down next year", what they are saying is the price will skyrocket.... AND THEN the price will remain high.

EX. A lemon goes from $0.49 to $0.99 today. And next year remains $0.99 !
Image
(2) Inflation is a measure of the change in a price.

Inflation is usually presented in terms of percentage of change. Currently inflation is running in excess of 10% this year, on an annual basis (annualized). Meaning prices (on aggregate) are 10% more than last year.
(3) The rate of inflation for fuel, unleaded regular gasoline, is up 60% on an annualized basis.

When the WH and FED say inflation will "level off" next year, they are saying the price next year will remain at least 60% more than last year, and will increase *more slowly*.
(4) Saying "inflation is transitional", or "inflation will come back down", is a misnomer intended to lull you to sleep and accept what Barack Obama said years ago: "under my policies prices will necessarily skyrocket".
(5) Why such a massive one-year spike, and then a leveling off with prices remaining high?

The answer is not difficult; however, the financial media have a vested interest in you not understanding.
(6) For the entirety of President Trump's term in office his economic policies were intentionally lowering prices.

For four years we were in a deflationary, or static place with consumer prices. [I'll explain in a minute]
(7) Four years of static pricing and dropping pricing that was specifically due to America-First economic policy.

Now... RIGHT NOW.... in one year, with the America-First agenda being destroyed, we are getting FOUR years of inflation compacted into one year.
(8) Right after the election the Fed knew what the reversal of Trump's trade and economic policies would do. That's why they said they would "accept inflation" in 2021.

reuters.com/business/energ…
(9) That’s Fed admission is because – while they will not say it openly, they know there’s no way to stop it.

Massive inflation is a direct result of the multinational agenda of the Biden administration; it’s a feature not a flaw, and it has nothing whatsoever to do with COVID.
(10) Keep in mind the first group to admit what is to come were the banks, specifically Bank of America, because the Fed monetary policy is part of the cause.

There is a doubling inflationary impact from the Fed pumping money.

msn.com/en-us/money/ma…
(11) Notice how Bank of America says "for up to four years" of large inflation. Why *four years*?

That's because BoA knows four years of Trump policy deflation preceded the current state of Obama/Biden "re-inflation". Four years = Presidential term.
(12) If Biden policy to reverse Trump was executed at the same rollout scale of Trump's economic policy, it would take four years of rising prices. But Biden is reversing Trump policy in year one. Hence all the re-inflation comes in year one.
(13) You might remember, when Trump initiated tariffs against China (steel, alum, & more), Southeast Asia (product specific), Europe (steel, alum, & direct products), Canada (steel, alum, lumber, dairy), the financial pundits screamed that consumer prices were going to skyrocket.
(14) They didn’t. Consumer prices did not increase.

Trump knew they wouldn’t because essentially those trading partners responded in the exact same way the U.S. did decades ago when the import/export dynamic was reversed.
(15) Trump’s massive, and in some instances targeted, import tariffs against China, SE Asia, Canada and the EU not only did not increase prices, the prices of the goods in the U.S. actually dropped.

It sounds counter-intuitive, until you understand what happened. 👇
(16) To retain their position, China and the EU responded to U.S. tariffs by devaluing their currency as an offset to higher export prices. It started with China, because their economy is so dependent on exports to the U.S.
(17) China first started subsidizing the targeted sectors hit by Trump's tariffs. The CCP government of Beijing gave industries free electricity, gas, eliminated taxes due, etc etc. To help offset U.S. import tariffs.

They lowered the price of goods being exported.
(18) Then China went further. Beijing (total communist control over their banking system) devalued their currency to boost their avoidance of U.S. tariffs.

However, the currency devaluation had an unusual effect.
(19) The cost of all Chinese imports dropped, not just on the tariff goods. Imported stuff from China dropped in price at the same time the U.S. dollar was strong. This meant it took less dollars to import the same amount of Chinese goods; and those goods were at a lower price.
(2 0) Yes, the Beijing subsidies and currency devaluation worked in the way it dropped prices of Chinese goods and offset U.S. tariffs.

However, as a result, we were importing deflation…. the exact opposite of what the financial pundits claimed would happen.
(21) Trump's overall "trade war" with China meant the Chinese were lowering prices in the battle, and as a consequence U.S. importers had lower prices.

These lower prices were passed on to U.S. consumers. Stuff from China was cheaper. ie. "deflation"
(22) However, as the Chinese economy was under pressure, they stopped purchasing industrial products from the EU, that slowed the EU economy.

Germany, France and the EU were furious....
(23) President Trump didn't care...
(24) In response to a lessening of overall economic activity, a *pissed off* EU then followed the same approach as China.

[Remember, the EU was already facing pressure from the exit of the U.K. from the EU system. BREXIT !!]
(25) The EU didn't like Trump putting steel & aluminum tariffs on them, then walking away from the Paris treaty, then dismissing the Transatlantic trade deal (TTIP), and now creating a massive North American economic engine with Mexico via the USMCA.
(26) So the EU decided to take the same approach as China and fight back. The EU central banks started pumping money into their economy and offsetting with subsidies. Yes, they essentially devalued the euro.
(27) The outcome for U.S. importers from the EU was same as the outcome for U.S-China importers. We began importing deflation from the EU side.

A strong dollar, lower Euro value; that means cheaper goods from the EU, and ultimately more deflation.

They really hated orange man.
(28) In the middle of this there was a downside for U.S. exporters. With China and the EU devaluing their currency, and with a very strong domestic U.S. economy, the value of the dollar increased.
(29) This made purchases from the U.S. more expensive. U.S. multinational companies who relied on exports (lots of agricultural industries and raw materials) took a hit from higher export prices.

Trump would need to help farmers, specifically those dependent on exports....👇
(30) However,... and this part is really interesting,... it only made those multinationals more dependent on domestic U.S. sales for income. With less being exported, there was more product available in the U.S for domestic purchase.
(31) With more product remaining in the U.S. what happened? Yup, you guessed it.... this dynamic led to another predictable outcome, even lower prices for U.S. consumers.

Lots of happy middle-class Americans. Orange man notsobad for them.
(32) From 2017 through early 2020 U.S. consumer prices were dropping. We were in a rare place where deflation was happening. Combine lower prices with higher wages, and you can easily see the strength within the U.S. economy.
(33) For the rest of the world this seemed unfair, and indeed they cried foul – especially Canada.

Canada was apoplectic. Tariffs on their lumber, dairy, Steel and aluminum, and then Trump shut down the NAFTA loophole they were using. Trudeau furious... sent Freeland to fight.
(34) However, this was "America First" in action.

Middle-class Americans were benefiting from Trump's reversal of 40 years of economic policies like those that created the rust belt. Democrats knew they had a big problem. Trump's economic agenda was working.
(35) NOW.... REVERSE THIS… and you understand where we are with inflation.

JoeBama economic policies are exactly the reverse. The monetary policy that pumps money into into the U.S. economy via COVID bailouts and ever-increasing federal spending drops the value of the dollar.
(36) With the FED pumping money into the U.S. system, the dollar value plummets. At the same time, JoeBama dropped tariff enforcement to please the Wall Street multinational corporations and banks that funded his campaign.
(37) Now the value of the Chinese and EU currency increases. This means it costs more to import products, and that is the primary driver of current price increases in consumer goods.
(38) Simultaneously, a lower dollar means cheaper exports for the multinationals (Big AG and raw materials).

China, SE Asia and even the EU purchase U.S. raw materials at a lower price. That means less raw material in the U.S. which drives up prices for U.S. consumers.
(39) It is a perfect storm. Higher costs for imported goods and higher costs for domestic goods (food). Combine this dynamic with massive increases in energy costs from ideological policy, and that’s fuel on a fire of inflation.
(40) Annualized inflation is now estimated to be around 10+ percent, and it will likely keep increasing. This is terrible for wage earners in the U.S. who are now seeing wage growth incapable of keeping up with higher prices.
(41) Real wages are decreasing by the fastest rate in decades. We are now in a downward spiral where your paycheck buys less. As a result, consumer middle-class spending contracts.
(42) Gasoline costs more (+60%), food costs more (+10% at a minimum) and as a result, real wages drop; disposable income is lost. Ultimately this is the cause of a stagnant economy & inflation.
(43) None of this is caused by COVID-19. All of this is caused by current economic policy and current monetary policy sold under the guise of COVID-19.
(44) If spending continues, the dollar drops. As a result the inflationary period continues. It is a spiral that can only be stopped if policies are reversed…. and the only way to stop these insane policies is to get rid of Wall Street democrats & republicans constructing them.
(45) Be patient, be respectful, be kind and caring. Don’t look for trouble. But when the time comes to fight, drop the niceties and fight for your family with insane ferocity. Fight like you're the third monkey on the ramp to Noah’s Ark…. and damned if it ain’t starting to rain.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with TheLastRefuge

TheLastRefuge Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TheLastRefuge2

Jun 4
1. FISA, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

Prior to January 2018, open discussion of the FISA Court was technically not allowed. Legally forbidden because everything around this issue was considered "classified" and a "national security interest." Image
2. If you pull back from the granular debate and think about it, none of the FISA justifications align with reality.

The FISA system is a designated secret court system that is said to only pertain to “foreign nationals.”

Ok, so if we accept the premise. Foreign nationals do not have U.S. constitutional protection. So why does the surveillance and intercept of them, and/or their communications, require secret U.S. courts?

The foundational premise of the FISC doesn't make sense from a constitutional perspective.

However, if you think about FISA and FISC as a false premise, then the actual purpose of both becomes something else entirely.
3. In reality, the Secret Court is needed because it’s not foreign nationals that need to be navigated in the American surveillance system. Rather, it’s the American citizenry engagement within that surveillance that requires a different legal approach.

Why should an American citizen suddenly have their constitutional protections switched from a normal U.S. Federal Court to a secret U.S. Federal FISA court simply because their contact -perhaps inadvertent- skims up against a foreign national?

The constitutional protection for an American (the 4th amendment to the Constitution) should not be arbitrary, depending on your contact.

Either you have Fourth Amendment protection, or you do not. If you are American, you do. So, what gives?

A regular federal court judge can decide on the issue of a Title-1 warrant, that can also be filed under seal if the exploration of the contact is a genuine concern.

There is no need for a secret court for either foreign nationals or U.S citizens. The former do not have constitutional protection, and the latter should not lose it under arbitrary determinations of U.S govt officials.

That’s the entire predicate that underpins the 4th amendment.Image
Read 6 tweets
Jun 3
1. Republicans are going bananas. Democrats, led by senate intel vice-chairman Mark Warner are having fits and meltdowns. 

All of it because President Trump announced the appointment of Bill Pulte to replace Tulsi Gabbard at the end of the month as Acting DNI.

To make the issues even better, Democrats are now threatening to block FISA-702 reauthorization and stop the warrantless surveillance of American citizens unless Pulte’s appointment is withdrawn. 

Yes, read that again slowly if needed – it’s perfect.Image
2. She couldn't get FISA reauthorization stopped by confronting congress, but she can get FISA reauthorization stopped by giving congress an alternative to herself. It's remarkable. Stunning.

..."Warner, who’s been critical in building Democratic support for a bipartisan deal to extend FISA Section 702, made clear to Thune that all options are on the table to reverse what Democrats see as a dangerous Trump pick to lead ODNI. Pulte, who currently leads the Federal Housing Finance Agency, has no national security experience and has used his existing role to exact revenge on Trump’s political foes.

From Warner’s perspective, it’s impossible to convince enough Democrats to support a reauthorization of Section 702 when Pulte would be the one overseeing the program. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has also privately told senators that the Pulte appointment makes passing a FISA deal much more difficult."....

punchbowl.news/article/senate…Image
3. Making the issue even more wonderful, the former Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee is the primary strategist behind confronting the corrupt IC mechanisms that have always been facilitated by the same senate committee now having fits.

Seriously folks, you cannot make this stuff up.

If you think that Rubio and Tulsi are not the key voices in this appointment dynamic, you just are not paying attention to the snark from the National Security Advisor.

All those smiles and giggles are not just because they enjoy their jobs, but also because they understand the politics much better than people fathom.

This is a 14-year-senator, former Chairman of the SSCI and Gang-of-Eight member. Let's just say, he knows the gig.Image
Read 6 tweets
May 30
I don't disagree with this perspective. However, did you ever consider this is part of geopolitically dissolving the 5-eyes dependencies?
Expand your thinking to include The Abraham Accords.

Remember this in Saudi Arabia? Image
Image
Most people look at these issues like this: Image
Read 4 tweets
Apr 13
A couple of points needed for context as the Michael Atkinson transcript is released.

(1) Prior to becoming Inspector General for the Intelligence Community (ICIG), Michael Atkinson was legal counsel to the office of the AAG at the DOJ National Security Division (DOJ-NSD).

(2) Atkinson was legal counsel to AAG Mary McCord, when the Carter Page FISA was submitted in Oct '16.

(3) The Legal Counsel for the DOJ-NSD is responsible for oversight of all of the FISA applications. Atkinson was responsible for legal review, when McCord submitted the Title-1 warrant application.

(4) Atkinson then left the DOJ-NSD and took a position as ICIG

(5) Mary McCord then left the DOJ and went to work for Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler on the joint House impeachment comittee.

(6) When ICIG Atkinson took the CIA complaint from Eric Ciaramella (working at the National Intelligence Council), and engaged with Congress, he was essentially back collaborating with his former colleague, Mary McCord.

(7) Atkinson doesn't have clean hands in this. He is not a neutral figure. He was an enabler for the false impeachment accusation, just as he was an enabler for the falsely constructed FISA application.Image
ICIG Complaint and Investigation documents.

justthenews.com/sites/default/…
Sept 19, 2019, transcript of ICIG Atkinson.

[NOTE: The GOP Reps who were present]

intelligence.house.gov/wp-content/upl…
Read 6 tweets
Apr 9
1. Unlike most of your followers, I know how to research the claims you are making and see the defamatory lies within them. @ReOpenChris @TuckerCarlson

Source for what is to follow:

projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/org… x.com/ReOpenChris/st…
2. "Alaska" - Franklin Graham hosts "Marriage Encounter" events in Alaska, near his own small property (less than a quarter acre), for military husbands and wives who are in desperate need of marital support, before the marriage collapses.

It is not an "end times" bunker complex. It is cabins in a remote area where the marriage encounter workshops take place.

The entire area does not have municipal electricity. They use generators for power. The 90,000 gal above ground diesel fuel is brought in to power these generators. The remote area is only habitable in summer. It is a Samaritans Purse mission.

@TuckerCarlson

projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/org…Image
3: "Compensation" - Franklin Graham received $466,000 in base compensation and $407,000 in other reportable IRS compensation.

projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/org…Image
Read 7 tweets
Mar 28
U.S. senators (mostly) write foreign aid policy, rules and regulations thereby creating the financing mechanisms to transmit U.S. funds. 

Those same senators then received a portion of the laundered funds back through their various “institutes” and business connections to the foreign government offices. Everyone in DC knows the gig.

Example: Ukraine laundry to Biden, Haiti laundry to Clinton, Iran laundry to Obama.

The U.S. State Dept. served as a distribution network for the authorization of the money laundering by granting DC conflict waivers, approvals for financing (McCain Institute, Clinton Global Initiative etc), and permission slips for the payment of foreign money.  

The officials within the State Dept. take a cut of the overall payments through a system of “indulgence fees”, commissions, junkets, gifts and expense account payments to those with political oversight.

If anyone gets too close to revealing the process they become a target of the apparatus. 

President Trump was considered a threat to this process. 

In reality all of the U.S. Senators (both parties) on the Foreign Relations Committee understand what is going on and/or are participating in a process for receiving taxpayer money and contributions from foreign governments. [See Bob Menendez]

A “Codel” is a congressional delegation that takes trips to work out the payments terms/conditions of any changes in graft financing. 

On the right the McCain Institute was/is one of the obvious examples of the financing network. [That is the primary reason why Cindy McCain was such an outspoken critic of President Trump.] On the left you see the Clinton Global Initiative, same/same.

This is why Senators spend $20 million on a campaign to earn a job paying $350k/year. 

The “institutes” is where the real foreign money comes in; billions paid by governments like China, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Ukraine, etc. etc.  There are trillions at stake.

The current nation of focus is the Ukraine laundry operation. The U.S. intelligence services, including CIA operations in USAID, have historically been the bagmen. That's why they consider Gabbard as a threat.Image
Image
Image
The Senate Foreign Affairs Committee (SFAC) is structurally designed to sell U.S. foreign policy.  We all know the game of multinational corporations positioning their investment assets in various countries based on the expectation of U.S. foreign policy to support those investments.  It is inside this network of long-established relationships that all of the various quid-pro-quos originate.

The Senate chamber as an institution is where most of the generational level corruption emanates; when the 17th amendment was created, this was the function and purpose for the constitutional change as organized by banking interests.  In the decades since inception, the corruption within the upper chamber has become systemic.  The Senate became entirely predicated on having greater power within the legislative branch.

Inside this institutional system, each Senate committee has an operational objective in alignment with the interests of the DC business.  The Senate is detached from any operational function that would be considered representative of the American voter.  The Senate Intel Committee supports the weaponized intelligence state. The Senate Finance and Banking committee supports the interests of big banks, who then reward the committee members.  The Senate Judiciary Committee is structured to lean into the corruption needed in the Judicial branch, by controlling appointments and nominations.  And so it goes, and so it goes.

Every member on the SFAC uses their position for personal and familial gain.  For their specific expertise, the SFAC funding mechanism is by foreign governments and multinational corporations with foreign policy interests. It’s what they do. 

Menendez is charged with the crime of doing what the Senate Foreign Affairs committee does; participate in bribery and corruption – although the pretending term is “lobbying.”

documentcloud.org/documents/2398…Image
Quit pretending.

In April 2024, 165 Democrats voted for a foreign aid package brought to the floor by Republican Speaker Mike Johnson.  The measure included $26 billion more for Israel, $61 billion more for Ukraine and around $10 billion for Taiwan.   151 Republicans voted to support the aid bill.

There is almost $100 billion in total foreign aid and approximately $0 to secure the southern U.S. border. 

This is a “Republican” bill, that passed with Democrats, not Republicans.  The ideological UniParty is very real in Washington DC, and this vote was entirely against the wishes of most Americans.

politico.com/live-updates/2…

It’s really not just Mike Johnson, the root of the issue is much deeper than just corrupt and detached Republican leadership.  The issue extends to every aspect of life and politics in Washington DC.  Every member is participating in a process to give money to other countries, regardless of whether the American voter wants that to happen or not.

There is a complete collapse of the governmental structure of the United States as it pertains to representative government.  The concept of representative government is completely gone, not even considered any longer amid the professional political class from both wings of the UniParty vulture.

I have no idea how this structural collapse can be fixed.  There doesn’t seem to be any entity willing to stop the nonsense as it relates to financial systems and U.S. foreign aid.

We are in an abusive relationship with our government. There really is no other way to look at it.Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(