An investing story about the rest of this year:

Covid finally starts to diminish in the rest of the world.

I think most American’s think that because we have lots of vaccinated people and our lives mostly normally now, the rest of the world is similar, but they aren’t,
Their vaccine levels are far below America’s and they have still been dealing with outbreaks and lockdowns as the USA has trended towards normal.

But that will change. They will get vaccinated, and go back to somewhat normal life as well. Here’s what’s going happen when they do.
Capital and wealth that flowed into the USA as we opened up our economy more fully before the rest of the world will flow back out to the global countries that are getting back to normal.

This wealth outflow will cause the USA stock markets to go down.
But the economy won’t really slow and the labor market will continue to be tight.

(since we have all learned over the last year and half that the stock market can go up while the economy struggles, we shouldn't be surprised by the opposite).
However, because the wealth is flowing out of the USA, the dollar falls. This causes inflation to get worse, as the $$ is falling and the labor market is tight.

Now with a falling stock market, a tight labor market, rising inflation, and a falling $, what is the fed going to do?
Are they going to try and save the market and make inflation worse? Would they raise rates to counteract pressure on the dollar?

Do markets react to the rising inflation with fear that it will erode profits, declining further?

When was the last time the fed faced this choice?
Now I made all this up, and It’s not what I think will happen, but it’s sounds plausible doesn't it?

How many people see this as a possible near term outcome?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Matt Hollerbach

Matt Hollerbach Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @breakingthemark

13 Aug
I’m often asked my views on long vol and tail risk hedging and if I’ve looked in it.

I haven’t really said much on the topic before, but I have explored it quite a bit.

Here’s what I’ve found in my journey into the long vol universe
On paper, long vol is a great asset to rebalance and run a Shannon’s Demon type approach. Its negatively correlated with many things, often times very negatively correlated. It’s the perfect type of asset to rebalance with other assets to increase the long term(geometric) return.
Pure theoretical long vol is awesome. I started out working with integrating “long VIX” with geometric balancing (my trading strategy).

The number were so scary good (visions of RenTech) I almost resigned from my engineering job the next day.
Read 29 tweets
7 Aug
How do you determine a car's speed?

Well one way is to measure the flow of gas going into the engine, do some math with that and the size of the engine, further calculate it with the dimensions of the crank shaft, input the current gearing ratio...
of the car, apply the weight of the car and the diameter of the wheels, and then add in the slope of the road and wind speed.

With all that you could calculate how a cars speed and you would have a good understanding of why its at that level.

Or...
You could just measure the wheel RPM, and use it's diameter to figure out the car's speed.

Which one would you go with?

Now I read these current papers which attempt to use order flows to explain market behavior, and I wonder...
Read 6 tweets
16 Jun
Is Geometric Balancing actually a value strategy?

Here’s the logic
When prices pop up, all other things being equal, Geo-balancing says the asset is now overvalued in the portfolio and sells it.

When prices fall it says the asset is now undervalued in the portfolio and buys it.
The decision to buy or sell is entirely based around the value that asset provides to the portfolio at its current price.

There are two key difference here to traditional value investing
1-The math to determine “value” is based around Claude Shannon’s “demon” and the Kelly criteria.

breakingthemarket.com/the-great-age-…
Read 7 tweets
9 Jun
With talk recently about improving a portfolio by adding new assets, I want to talk about the opposite.

Can removing assets improve your portfolio?

Let’s start off with a sports analogy from one of the greatest basketball teams ever.
The 2015 Golden State Warriors were a great basketball team. But in the championship they fell behind early.

Their coach then tried something different. He removed the “center” position from his lineup and replaced him with another forward.
This line up was small. It didn’t have a “big man” as all traditional lineups do.

But removing the biggest player on the court, and playing two small forwards instead, made the team unstoppable and they easily won the remaining games to win the championship.
Read 12 tweets
25 May
Hedge funds, are the spices of the investing world.

By themselves, they often don’t taste spectacular, but when you mix them with other ingredients they improve the flavor of other foods.
Many specialized funds do not actually produce much, if any, return. But they are often negatively correlated to the market.

This means that adding them to a foundational “beta” portfolio improves their geometric return by lowering portfolio volatility.
What bothers me though is spices have recipes, which tell you how much spice to add to what amount of the other main ingredients.

Hedge funds don’t. How much hedge fund do you mix with the S&P 500?
Read 8 tweets
15 Apr
I think the real scarce resource in Bitcoin isn’t created by the the 21 million coin limit, but by the 7 transactions per second limit.

The real money will be in controlling that resource.

A thought experiment...
Let’s assume Bitcoin is successful from a store value/digital gold perspective. People will use it like a savings account or investment account.

Suppose there are a billion wallets, a touch more than 10% of the global population (of course organizations will have wallets to).
Since bitcoin is for savings, imagine people only need to make a transaction once a month.

Invest new savings or pull out past savings to purchase something. Similar to what people use long term savings/investing accounts today.
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(