You will be shocked to learn that PillowGuy’s “Absolute Proof” doesn’t exist, according to his own cybersecurity experts. The promised “pcaps” don’t exist; they had garbage data provided by a notorious serial scam artist. Who could have predicted? washingtontimes.com/news/2021/aug/…
The source of the garbage data that doesn’t actually contain pcaps is Dennis Montgomery, whose career for the past two decades has consisted of running one elaborate fraud after another. npr.org/templates/stor…
Note that Lindell’s cyber expert, now repudiating his claims, is Josh Merritt, aka Spyder, an IT consultant falsely presented as a military intelligence expert in Sidney Powell’s lawsuits, and author of a comically inept dream logic affidavit claiming OTHER bogus fraud evidence.
So EVEN THAT GUY is saying Lindell has nothing.
That’s like having P.T. Barnum tell you it’s time to tone down your exaggerations.
Merritt is the guy who told federal courts that secret SCORECARD software was used to tamper with elections because he found a progressive site with a “scorecard” subdomain that hosted… a political scorecard. Montogmery, well… where to begin…
Montgomery is probably BEST known for causing false terror alarms by scamming the Pentagon & CIA with tall tales about being able to detect secret Al Qaeda messages hidden in Al Jazeera broadcasts. wired.com/2009/12/montgo…
Montgomery once sued reporter James Risen for describing him as a con artist, and a federal court said: “nope, that’s pretty fair.”

courthousenews.com/risen-cleared-…
For his next trick, he conned Sheriff Joe Arpaio out of $120k in taxpayer money to “investigate” a conspiracy theory that the DOJ & CIA were plotting against Arpaio. He never gave THEM the promised evidence either. usatoday.com/story/news/pol…
And, of course, Montgomery has cropped up again more recently with a *different* set of bogus election fraud claims. thedailybeast.com/infamous-hoax-…
Even if you’re a credulous moron, I don’t understand how anyone at this late date decides to yoke their reputation to this guy. It’s like getting an offer from Jeffrey Epstein to babysit & thinking “well he sounds trustworthy.”

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Julian Sanchez

Julian Sanchez Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @normative

13 Aug
So, uh… this sure looks an AWFUL lot like a Mesa County, CO official helped conspiracy theorists steal data from Colorado’s election systems in order to give them to Mike Lindell to hunt for phantom evidence of “rigging”. cpr.org/2021/08/12/inv…
Like, this is an extremely specific reply that implies she knows exactly how the data was exfiltrated. Peters then hung around while a notorous QAnon crank poked around in a hard drive from Colorado’s election network on livestream. Image
Peters apparently “ordered her staff to turn off the video surveillance that is meant to monitor the voting machines a week before the breach, and that it was only recently turned back on.”
Read 5 tweets
12 Aug
The bits of PillowCon I caught streaming had some examples of this phenomenon. Techies w/ no background in election systems poked around drive images & fussed over log files seemingly deleted during a software update & a batch file that seems to suspend security restrictions.
Can you make those things fit a conspiracy narrative? Sure. Are they actually suspicious or abnormal? Were they interpreting those things correctly? Presumably you’d want to ask someone who knows what “normal” looks like.
Instead the MO seemed to be: “I don’t understand what this is. I can tell a story where it’s explained by something nefarious. Therefore it’s evidence of something nefarious."
Read 4 tweets
12 Aug
You guys I’m not sure this judge takes PillowGuy entirely seriously.
Read 4 tweets
11 Aug
Here’s an interesting case study of how “do your own research” misinfo works. Last month, CDC announced that at the end of 2021 it would withdraw its request for Emergency Use Authorizarion of a PCR test for COVID. cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs…
The CDC announcement included this:
“CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses.”
Fox News published this astonishingly misleading story reporting on the CDC announcement with little explanation, but juxtaposed it with references to declining flu reports in 2020. foxnews.com/health/cdc-lab…
Read 14 tweets
10 Aug
Because I like exterminating any residual shreds of faith in humanity, I looked through the overwhelmingly hostile comments on a YouTube video by a doctor debunking some covid misinformation tonight. I noticed an interesting parallel to some “election theft” disinfo.
Here’s what I note in both cases: The cranks typically have the superficial trappings of real science. Links to journal articles on the one hand, or on the other, impressively hackery looking hex dumps & spreadsheets full of IP addresses. “See, I’m giving you the evidence…”
Now in both cases, this evidence is absolutely useless to the target audience. They have neither the training nor the context to evaluate the quality or relevance of technical articles in medical journals—or even to understand what the article is claiming in many cases.
Read 16 tweets
6 Aug
50 years into the era of personal computing, the idea that all computers should come preloaded with spyware had only really been seriously entertained by authoritarian regimes like North Korea. Apparently now it’s going mainstream. cato.org/blog/apples-ip…
I’m curious how far they’ve thought out the legal end of this. A government (ours or an uglier one) approaches Apple with a court order saying “here’s a list of hash values we want you to add to the scan list you’re pushing out”. Can they refuse? Or even tell anyone?
This isn’t really a “slippery slope” — it’s a single heavily greased step. You need one order with a gag attached saying “you’re required to add this list of hashes” & your carefully crafted child protection system becomes an all-purpose population-scale search tool.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(