This is the mechanism of truly effective disinformation at work. Reply to a false claim that you are your cronies have asserted ("jabs are actually *causing* infections") with a study which "proves" your point. Except it doesn't - at all... 1/ 
What the study *actually* says is - we've found that some people's immune systems are briefly attenuated after the vaccine, so that healthcare workers in daily contact with the virus *may* be more likely to catch it *for a couple of weeks*. 2/
Of course, what *actually* comes out the other end of this human centipede composed of semi-professional disinformers & Patreon-addicts is this: "jabs give you covid" 3/
Now I'm not a scientist, but I applied my mind and I could figure this out. But what about the other more subtle claims these guys are making? The ones I cannot "figure out"? How does a vaccine-hesitant person respond to those claims? They just don't get vaccinated.
This is going to lead *directly* to deaths. I have had dozens of people on Twitter tell me "I trust PANDATA, not you guys". Some of those people - or their loved ones - are going to die as a result of that misplaced trust. This isn't debatable. The only question is "how many"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
