What does "decoupling" even mean? Is there consensus around a set of metrics that would define it? Maybe I'm not talking to the right people, but no one in my industry has been able to tell me with any conviction what decoupling is, much less whether or not "it" is even possible.
Does 'decoupling' mean less trade? How much less? In what sectors exactly? Does it mean less investment? What do you mean "investment"? Does it mean keeping each other's technology out of each other's networks? What technology? What networks?
This word has bled into the global policy conversation and become a talking point with poor strategic and logical foundation. Data analysts struggle to map the ramifications, because the word itself is unclear.
Existing extremely hypothetical projections show that we have no real idea what the ramifications would be, but that in today's globally-interconnected markets, there would probably be lots of unintended consequences for China, the U.S., and its allies. uschamber.com/sites/default/…
People keep asking whether or not I think decoupling is a good idea, and I don't have an opinion, because the truth is, I don't know what they're talking about, and I suspect neither do they.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Chinese regulators to off-campus education (incl edtech): "We know your stocks are falling, but tough cookies - you are putting too much pressure on parents and are detrimental to on-campus education, so we're restructuring this industry permanently." 1/12 finance.people.com.cn/n1/2021/0801/c…
Recap: Recently, China issued "Opinions on Further Reducing the Burden of Students' Homework and Off-campus Training in Compulsory Education" - a policy which effectively kneecaps the off-campus tutoring industry. 2/12
Regulators are well aware of the results: "As of the close of the market on July 27, a number of U.S.-listed Chinese concept stocks have fallen by more than 90%, and 11 companies have fallen by about 80%, with education stocks accounting for the vast majority." 3/12
New rules are coming for Chinese companies seeking to list abroad. Chinese policymakers are trying pretty hard to assure markets that Chinese companies will still be allowed to IPO overseas - but they will need to follow new rules in doing so. 1/14 finance.people.com.cn/n1/2021/0801/c…
"The 30th meeting of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee proposed to improve the regulatory system for domestic enterprises listing overseas." 2/14
"This is not only a practical matter of improving relevant regulations and standardizing the behavior of relevant enterprises in response to a changing situation, but also reflects China's firm determination to promote opening up and make use of dual sources of capital." 3/14
Major news this week on China's social credit system. Best part: there's finally a (draft) official list of what types of data / records are being included in citizen, corporate, and org social credit files, and where those records come from. 1/24 ndrc.gov.cn/yjzxDownload/2…
We triangulated this last year by looking at the tech docs that describe what types of files are supported for sharing across gov-run social credit networks. We then cross-referenced that against state agencies which generate those records - but there are now more deets. 2/24
So I'm translating the draft here - all 16 record types the national government is gathering on companies, citizens, and organizations under China's social credit system - what types of records, who collects and submits them, and who they are collected on. 3/24
An opinion piece today on people.cn - The best take I've read so far on Beijing's views and motivations re: crackdown on Didi, IPOs and the move to reign in internet companies. Some key quotes below. 1/x finance.sina.com.cn/tech/2021-07-0…
Tech companies have been in an era of "barbaric growth": "The so-called end of the barbaric era means that in addition to laying down systematic rules, the rules needs to be truly implemented to maintain healthy [market] order." 2/16
"The implementation of China's cyber security review mechanism indicates that Chinese Internet companies will officially bid farewell to the barbaric growth stage." 3/16
Mixed feelings on the WSJ's latest piece of Chinese data policy. On one hand, think they did a good job of touching on key points. On the other hand, the nuance gets lost in the ominous overtones and they end up kind of missing the bigger picture. wsj.com/articles/china…
Example - here's what the article says: "[China] recently issued a draft rule that would forbid electric-car makers from transferring outside China any information collected from users on China’s roads and highways."
Here's what the actual policy says: "Article 12: Personal information or important data shall be stored within [China] according to law. If it is necessary to provide it outside the territory, an outbound data security assessment ... shall be undertaken."
New #socialcredit policy just released by China's State Council. Pretty much what we were expecting, it's all about standardizing and clarifying confusions and concerns in the existing social credit system. 1/7 gov.cn/zhengce/conten…
The document 1) Calls to create a national social credit data catalog that more clearly standardizes exactly which government records will be included in SCS files, and how that data can be shared 2/7
2) Calls for more top-down management over blacklists, and calls for agencies to heavily standardize — and clearly publish — the process for determining who can be blacklisted, and under what conditions. 3/7