Some thoughts on what Aspires win last night means for TH
Pic is of 2021 by-election results versus May 2018 local election results
a. Kabir Ahmed/Lutfur Rahman/Aspire won a safe Labour ward - they have won 2 of 3 by-elections since 2018 - not a guarantee of success next May
1/
as in 2016 they also won Whitechapel only to lose it in 2018
b. Lutfur Rahman will see this as an encouragement to him to stand as Mayor next May - if there is low turnout and no PATH party to split the vote he could win next May unless John Biggs gets loads of 2nd preference
2/
votes
c. I have twice given John my 2nd preference vote I am unclear why I should do so again, TH is just not doing a good job enough job in a range of areas (see 3 closed swimming pools as latest issue), while Council officers get part of blame he is ultimately responsible
3/
That does not mean I think Lutfur would do a better job
c. All of the parties that increased their % votes campaigned on challenging Liveable Streets, parties supporting LS lost vote share (Labour & Green)
This does not mean everybody voted just on Liveable
Streets issues
4/
I would argue that Liveable Streets has sucked resources (time & £) away from more important areas (to voters) like ASB, social infrastructure etc so some of the votes against Labour maybe a wish for the Council to focus more on other issues
But also an indictment of how
5/
implemented as most people in favour of better streets including for local disabled residents and emergency services (hint)
d. Next Mays elections are going to be very interesting & close, temptation for all kinds of abuses given how tight Cllr races have been in the past
6/
PS by abuse I include a range of behaviour by a range of people not aimed just at one party
e. Aspire did produce very professional literature, page 3 of latest Weaver leaflet you will see repeated next May
I guess the real Q will be how Labour and the Mayor now respond
7/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew Wood

Andrew Wood Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Andrewwood17

10 Aug
Pictures of Council presentation about future of St Georges Leisure Centre
Basically building falling apart from old age
Council looking at a variety of options short term/long term
We have 4 other pools, Tiller has similar problems but nowhere as bad so will re-open next year
1/ ImageImageImageImage
+ Mile End + Poplar Baths + York Hall
St Georges cannot re-open without major work circa £10 m
Should Council run with 4 pools only?
or build a pool at John Orwell in Wapping?
or rebuild St Georges?
Short term a number of options exist i.e. transport to other open pools
2/ ImageImageImageImage
better.org.uk/leisure-centre…
Mayoral Commitments are the promises the Mayor is making tonight about next steps
But this will be up to the Council to fix even though operated by GLL/Better
They have looked at Lido in Shadwell Basin as an option
I guess key question is why St Georges
3/ ImageImageImageImage
Read 8 tweets
23 Jul
£1.7 billion over 30 years is roughly how much the Council will need to spend on housing programme
Last night Cllrs had a presentation on Savills report, see ⬇️
As I feared the presentation I was sent was real although they made a number of changes after my email
I am very
1/
worried now about a range of issues
But I realised last night key issue is that they started this strategic analysis AFTER initiating the 1,000 new home programme (which won’t all be new homes)
Should have been done before as now handicaps later options
But I understand better
2
now how Croydon went bankrupt
We have some very good Council officers, either temps fixing big problems or overloaded with too much responsibility
But problems is at the top, there is a lack of detailed analysis of the issues & strategic analysis in part because fire-fighting
3/
Read 4 tweets
21 Jul
NOX Update on enforcement
As you may know a Public Space Protection Order (PSPO) was made in April to ban the use of Nitrous Oxide aka laughing gas aka NoX in Tower Hamlets, as their use not normally illegal
A key point is that while the Police can use these powers to issue
1/
fines for using NOX, they won't be using them as apparently it is not practical ⬇️to train Police officers on how to issue a Fixed Penalty Notice so only Tower Hamlets Enforcement Officers will issue them!
Approved on the 28th of April 2021 and legal as soon as signs put up
2/
Tower Hamlets Enforcement Officers started to enforce the PSPO on the 24th of May 2021, a month later, a PSPO only lasts 36 months
Hot Spot locations have been identified and offices tasked using the Safer Neighbourhood Operations tasking process.
3/
Read 6 tweets
21 Jul
A Labour motion tonight at the full Council meeting will say local government employment has fallen by 900,000 people, true but misleading
Central government employment went up!
When a local authority school converts to academy, staff move from local to central government
1/
So around 600,000 of the reduction is change in classification
But there will be other changes going on as well as Councils outsourced & TUPEd staff
So hard to tell what the true change in local government employment was but almost certainly still a reduction overall
2/
2,917k employed in local government 2010 down to 2,006k in 2020 = 911k decline
Academy numbers 30k in 2010 up to 606k in 2020
Note total government no. down though but there have been lots of other moves i.e. the banks, housing associations so hard to understand true pic
3/
Read 5 tweets
21 Jul
I sent this email at 11.40pm last night because I got frightened reading a presentation for a Cllr briefing session on Thursday about something called the Savills report on £ for homes
I always avoid sending emails after 9pm, when you are tired you make mistakes but after
1/
reading the presentation I had to say something before Thursday
The email was to Council officers & other members of the Overview & Scrutiny Committee who have been asking for a mysterious report written by @Savills about how we finance existing & new home
See background below
2/
Why the fear on my side?
Croydon Council went bankrupt in part because it did not manage the finances related to the subject of this report
How did opposition Cllrs at Croydon miss this or fail to stop it?
What am I missing & do not understand?
2/
Read 8 tweets
20 Jul
TH Council made a £3.5 million surplus last year from COVID
Spent £41.7 million extra but received £45.2 million from government + £8.4 million to be moved to 2021/22
Last August TH Council said they need to spend £60 million more than expected on COVID, promised £30 million
1/
they said by government
So contrary to all of the claims government did step up & gave TH Council more money than they needed last year
+ extra money also for 2021/22 not detailed in this Cabinet report!
See 6.11
democracy.towerhamlets.gov.uk/ieListDocument…
2/
Overall summary (figures in brackets are positive / income i.e. good news )
+ moving £4 million to reserves i.e. building up reserves - like putting £ into a bank
This contradicts almost everything the Council said about its finances in 2020/21
There are still risks in 2021/22
3/
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(