PFIZERLEAK REDUX - THE REAL REASON WHY YOUR GOVERNMENT KEEPS THE PFIZER CONTRACTS SECRET FOR 10 YEARS.
(thread)
Deep within the contracts that countries have signed with Pfizer are clauses that put the democracy of these countries under immediate, imminent threat.
All democracies have (with some variations) at least three branches: "legislative, executive and judicial... each branch has its own powers and responsibilities."
The clauses you are about to read appear, with slight variations, in non-retracted contracts that I have seen so far. The only exception is the EU/EC contract (more on that below).
"Purchaser also expressly and irrevocably waives the
application of any Law in any jurisdiction that may otherwise limit or cap its obligation to pay damages arising from or in connection with any Indemnified Claims."
9.4 (cont)
"...the Person signing this Agreement on its behalf has actual authority to waive such immunity and bind Purchaser and the State of Brazil to the limitations
of liability and liability waivers set forth herein."
9.5 Conditions Precedent to Supply:
“Purchaser…will continue to have adequate statutory or regulatory authority and adequate funding…(to) fulfill the indentation obligations and provide adequate protection from liability... in connection with the Vaccine or its use" #PfizerLeak
"a condition precedent to supply… requires that Purchaser shall implement and maintain...such statutory or regulatory requirements…sufficient to meet it obligations … shall maintain such statutory and regulatory requirements… for as long as necessary."
"Suppliers’ supply...is in reliance...(that)...Purchaser implementing and maintaining in effect the requirements and funding and other representations and warranties made by Purchaser under this Agreement"
The commitments of the government to Pfizer in sections 9.4 and 9.5 are not only for current laws and regulations but include a commitment "maintaining in effect the requirements" of the "adequate statutory or regulatory authority and adequate funding."
Even if a parliament voted to approve the contract with Pfizer (and in most countries it didn't), unless the un-retracted version was debated upon, then voted for, there is a path for a judiciary challenge.
Below you can see the long term impact of the contract:
2) The ability of Pfizer to cease any asset or any territory in case of contract breach which would occur beyond the government period is an example of long term obligation.
3) Most countries did not have special rules for vaccine liability protection (source: "COVID-19 Vaccine Cross-Border Liability and Compensation", RAND institute). The parliament in these countries should have voted to change the law.
4) These clauses include a commitment of the government that "Pfizer decides whether the statutory or regulatory requirements or funding appropriation is correct". There is no time limitation here.
Pfizer becomes the legislator and judge that controls the contract.
5) When a vaccine is defined as "any device, technology, or product used to enhance the use or effect of, such vaccine" (1.57), this contract introduces clauses that can diminish citizen's birthright for bodily autonomy and freedom of movement, against all laws.
TO SUMMARIZE: our governments signed a contract in secrecy, making commitments that diminish the role of the parliament and the judiciary, and might introduce technologies that might have an impact on our fundamental freedoms.
Ask yourself:
How can we know what other contracts our governments signed or what contracts would they sign next (in secrecy) which might empty our democracy even further?
Unless we stop it, we will all be living in totalitarian state, in a banana republic.
The EC contracts are different and the clauses above are not there, However: 1) This is a form of legislation, which should have been voted in the European Parliament and IT DIDN'T. 2) Indemnification clauses are there.
Totalitarian states comes in different flavors.
EU/EC:
In 2017 the European Court of Justice (ECJ) said vaccine injured party can bring "serious, specific and consistent evidence" and it can prevail if it shows vaccine is "the most plausible explanation for the occurrence of the damage".
The contract the EC signed on behalf of EU member states is creating a landscape where the member states must indemnify & defend the vaccine manufacturers against their own citizens based on a contract that was signed in secrecy.
🚨Microwave Ovens Might Be Risking Your Health! 🚨
Did you know that eating microwaved food could cause blood changes linked to cancer? Russians knew it. Swiss scientist Dr. Hans-Urich Hertel discovered this over 30 years ago, but the microwave industry tried to silence him.
🧵
Dr. Hans-Urich Hertel was a Swiss food scientist who challenged microwave safety. In 1989, he teamed up with Professor Bernard Blanc to study how microwaved food affects us. Their findings? Alarming enough to spark a decade-long battle! #ScienceHeroes #MicrowaveResearch
Hertel and Blanc recruited eight volunteers from a macrobiotic institute in Switzerland. For eight weeks, they ate raw, conventionally cooked, or microwaved foods—like milk and veggies—under strict conditions (no smoking, alcohol, or sex!). Blood tests followed every meal. #MicrowaveStudy #HealthResearch
THE GLOBAL IT OUTAGE YOU WITNESSED WAS NOT AN ACCIDENT!
IMPORTANT! The purpose of this thread is to explain non-IT and to non information/cyber security professionals why I believe the outage you are seeing around the world due to the update from #Crowdstrike is not an accident.
Before we begin - introduction.
Hi everyone. My name is Ehden Biber. I'm known as the person behind #PfizerLeak, and most of my writing here on X/Twitter has been on ph@rma related topics. HOWEVER, my professional work has been information security and cybersecurity.
My credentials include:
· Head of information security in Metro Bank (UK).
· Merck/MSD Information security office for Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA).
· Consultant to insurance and financial institutes.
The opinion you are about to read is based on YEARS of experience.
"MEDICAL GENETICS…WILL BE THE SOUL OF PERCISION MEDICINE IN EVERY FIELD"
It is time to expose another member of the W.H.O. science council and her views on genomics and gene therapy (mRNA). Introducing Dr Mary-Claire King.
[Thread]
[1/7]:
[2/7]
Doctor Mary-Claire King is a very known geneticist who has discovered in 1990 BRCA1,which was the first gene for a hereditary form of breast cancer. She is a professor of genome sciences in the university of Washington, Seattle, USA. medgen.uw.edu/people/mary-cl…
[3/7]
Her later work was focused on the genetics of schizophrenia, she is recognized as a pioneer in the development of DNA sequencing for human rights investigations, and she is also a Senior Associate Core Member of the New York Genome Center.
THE COUNCIL: INTRODUCING THE W.H.O. SCIENCE COUNCIL THAT IS ABOUT TO CONTROL YOUR LIFE.
As we approach the final stages of the #WHO coup d'état attempt, it is time to expose the group of unelected people who will control your future and their alarming agenda!
#TheCouncil
[Thread]
2/ In December 2023 the WHO produced a report that sets the stage to radical changes that soon will be enforced all the citizens of the world: make gene therapy (mRNA) key technology in the fight against infectious diseases, cancer, and combat any resistance to such technologies.
3/ It called to develop new gene therapy treatments against pathogens, promote investment in "equitable" development of the technology, use it as THE medical countermeasure mechanism to tackle pandemic threats, and to combat any resistance to the technology ("misinformation").
@robinmonotti 1) He uses the exaggerated Hamas dataset. 2) He uses a definition of children for anyone under 18 years old. 3) He say Palestinians were expelled in 1948, but don't mention many left because Arab nations told them to so they can butcher Jews in the war they started.
More below.
@robinmonotti 4) He compare the number of children who died to the sum total of children died 3 years before. He does not compare it to the number of children who died in other conflicts IN THE REGION, such as in Syria. That like comparing apples and pears.
More below.
@robinmonotti 5) The definition of who is a Palestinian by the UN is ANYONE WHO LIVED IN THE MANDATED PALESTINE FOR TWO YEARS prior to June 1848! No ancestors required!
This also made Egyptians who escaped Egypt not to become work slave in the creation of the Suez canal into Palestinians.
THE AZ STUDY: Why did AZ asked to withdraw their EUA marketing authorisation approval, and how come you didn't hear about it?
Short answer: BECAUSE THEIR LONG TERM SAFETY STUDY SHOWN THAT THEIR COV!D19 SH0TS K!LLED AND HARMED PEOPLE.
Long answer: READ THE THREAD!
#TheAZStudy 1/
2/ As you might have heard, AstraZeneca ASKED in March 2024 to have their COV!D19 SH0TS product approval withdrawn from Europe's EMA. It was not the European Union (EMA) who decided to withdraw their approval due to the damage they caused people. BUT WHY?
3/ To understand what happened, let's start with a QUICK, SHORT reminder (the following 3 posts) before we will go into the details.
I promise you it's worth reading!
29 JANUARY 2021: EMA recommends COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca for authorisation in the EU ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-re…