I've not seen this movie or read the play but reminded me of odd way Amanda Plummer was very specifically typecast as "seemingly incoherent woman with secret insights", in her Tony-winning "Agnes Of God", her Emmy-winning SVU role ("Weak"), and her biggest hit ("Catching Fire").
Of course the lead in "Catching Fire" probably got the job because they were like, "well, Jennifer Lawrence already skinned a squirrel onscreen in that Oscar movie, let's just get her to do it again". So Hollywood does this.
Or--I'm sure I've Tweeted about this before, and it's not unique to me, Brian Cox's FOUR different "guy behind the memory-erasing super-soldier program" roles.
I'm ripping off some list of these, I forget. If you've seen Bruce Greenwood in a movie, then he might well have been President of the United States.
If you were a "Sliders" fan and you asked why Cleavant Derricks was in the main cast as an old-time R&B star, maybe someone just liked his Tony-winning "Dreamgirls" role as...an old-time R&B star...
Jon Ossoff didn't fall out of a coconut tree either.
Tell me that AOC ran her primary because she was recruited by a group and I'm like "oh, well, they did a good job, they should do it more often...or is this like an American Idol thing where sometimes you randomly get your biggest star the first time around".
Look--nobody just wakes up one day and decides to run for Senate and has slick videos and such. Everyone from every faction is recruited by some network or other. That's an interesting process to me but I don't think it abrogates any particular candidacy.
That woman who went viral for being "just a normal mom with some questions" was probably licking envelopes with her best friend the State Senator five years ago, or drawing signs for the Whatever March, blah blah. How these things work.
Again it is a process I find interesting. With any candidate you can ask, you know, how did they build their network, when did it start, what was the impetus...like what happened to Ralph between 2004 and 2007.
It's funny that (different) people make basically mutually exclusive complaints about Discord/WhatsApp/Telegram ("people being radicalized in secret echo chambers") and about Instagram/Twitter ("we're not meant to all be in one big chat room").
Like if your problem is "the algorithms" then you should like Discord, I don't think there's anything algorithmic about it at all.
For years and years people on big social media sites were bemoaning the loss of little walled garden forums for niche topics, and now that's back, and I guess it's just as bad as everything else.
Well, what does "conservative" mean. Nathan Lane was afraid of coming out in the 90s. You didn't have literal card-carrying socialists winning political office in cities all over the country. You didn't have hundreds of legal marijuana stores all over Michigan.
Yes this was happening all the time at the BET awards in the less-conservative 80s and 90s.
I'm a big fan of Matt Baume, all of his videos are like, "here's the months of painstaking negotiation that it took to have a gay character on a sitcom in 1995". Now there's a trans star on "Jeopardy" (median viewing age, roughly 157).
Hm maybe Democrats could walk some picket lines, funnel a ton of money into infrastructure, put some aggressive antitrust regulators into the FTC, oversee tight labor markets and income growth concentrated in the bottom quartiles, that should fix it.
Plus finally running on legal weed, pic unrelated.
I don't have an answer, IDK if there is an answer other than "wait for something bad to happen under Trump and run on that, again", which is also what Trump did to Biden/Harris, but you know...