Having been astonished lately to find a seemingly anti-censorship organisation - @IndexCensorship - publishing defamatory nonsense *advocating* censorship, it is an intellectual relief, if a serious ethical & political concern, to learn it's spook-fed. morningstaronline.co.uk/article/weeken…
It's part of a wider problem: 'The infiltration & manipulation of press freedom & human rights groups by the intelligence services is merely an extension of the cold war efforts to ensure that they remain largely ineffective & steer any campaign into safe, apolitical liberalism.'
Edward Said reflected on the wider problem of 'the insidious intellectual abuses of American power' in this book review from 1999: lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v21/…
Already in 1999 Said was clear: "The task is to provide as much material as can be assembled from alternative sources (today’s mainstream media being nearly useless for that purpose) and to apply universal norms of justice to overweening power and unchecked market economics."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The big question here is: Why is CIJA (Commission for International Justice and Accountability) mounting an elaborate sting operation on the citizen investigator?
Here are McKeigue's statement and earlier questions to CIJA director: syriapropagandamedia.org/personal-state… bbc.co.uk/news/uk-565256…
CIJA - and Tsamota, a group of companies with the same director - were previously investigated by European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF). CIJA has been funded by several governments, including UK.
In the news last year:
CIJA's operation has also been investigated by @MaxBlumenthal and @BenjaminNorton for Grayzone, who found it 'collaborated with al-Qaeda to wage lawfare on Syria'.
Why have upwards of 20 articles been produced attacking those of us who are questioning important aspects of UK propaganda operations? Several of these are by Dominic Kennedy (listed in Integrity Initiative documents) for the Times. off-guardian.org/2020/10/06/the…
The Times's first hit on the the Working Group - by Kennedy & colleagues - was the very morning US, UK and France were bombing Syria in response to the allegations of a chemical attack on Douma.
Three years on, distinguished and honourable public figures are expressing their deep concern at how the OPCW report on Douma was nobbled by those whose justification for the bombing is challenged by the truth.
1. 'The Syria FFMs operate under bureaucratic not scientific control. The Office of the Director General, which has neither technical nor scientific expertise, controls the investigative and reporting aspects of the FFMs and excludes scientific scrutiny and formal peer review'
2. The original interim report was secretly modified for publication in June 2018 & only stopped when discovered by a member of the Douma team. The modifications drew unsupported conclusions and censored issues about chemistry, toxicology, ballistics and witness testimony.
8 hospitalised from a vessel with accommodation for 234.
We obviously need more information to know what happened in this particular case. But that's also so more generally: we need to know what can go wrong. Here, people fit enough to be serving in the navy have been affected.
Strange! Looking for more information about the Australian sailors hospitalised after covid jab, I found a link to an article in the Daily Mail. But the article had already disappeared.
Because Bellingcat’s investigations are quite niche, relatively few people carefully study them. But a lot do read the promotional material -including now Bellingcat’s own book about themselves- saying how great they are, and this gets accepted.
Yet other views are possible. 1/