Paul Poast Profile picture
Aug 14, 2021 25 tweets 8 min read Read on X
The Taliban is rapidly advancing in Afghanistan. How did this happen after 20 years of US involvement?

[THREAD] Image
To answer the question, you need to understand:

1) That Afghanistan was fragile before the US invaded in 2001

2) The reason why the US invaded in 2001

3) That the US lost focus on Afghanistan shortly after completing the invasion
First, it's important to understand that Afghanistan was a fragile country prior to the 2001 US invasion.
Throughout the 1980s, Afghanistan was the ground for a "proxy war" between the Soviet Union (backing the government) and the United States (backing rebels). Image
Soviet troops left in 1989 and the USSR fully withdrew support to the Afghan government in 1992 (following the USSR's collapse). Image
The result was the onset of a new civil war in the country between multiple groups. Image
Of the groups, the Taliban (w/ support from Pakistan), emerged as the dominant group. It eventually took control of most of the country Image
But fighting continued. By 2001, the country looked like this (with the remaining militant groups forming the "Northern Alliance") Image
Second, it's critical to review why the US invaded Afghanistan in 2001.
On September 11, 2001, the US was attacked by the extremist group Al-Qaeda Image
Why those attacks happened is for another thread (20th anniversary is coming soon). For now, what's important is that Al-Qaeda's base of operations was Afghanistan and it was supported by the Taliban government (such as making use of training facilities -- shown in photo) Image
Then US President George W. Bush issued an ultimatum to the Taliban: close the facilities and hand over the leader of Al-Qaeda, Osama Bin Laden.
The Taliban refused the ultimatum.

Without going into all of the details, the US lent support to the Northern Alliance forces and then brought in its own forces. The Taliban forces were quickly defeated. Image
At this point, the United States, with the assistance of its @NATO allies, sought to stabilize and rebuild the country (via the @UN authorized ISAF mission) -- important to remember that international community largely supported US actions at this point. Image
Third, it's essential to understand that the US essentially deprioritized Afghanistan shortly after completing the interstate war portion of the fighting.
How so? Iraq, specifically Saddam Hussein. Image
I can't go fully into why the US invaded Iraq. That's covered in this thread
What is critical is that the decision to invade Iraq shortly after invading Afghanistan drew away vital resources (attention, military resources, and aid) during the critical early years of the occupation.
nytimes.com/2007/08/12/wor…
The consequence of deprioritizing Afghanistan? It meant by 2009, control of the country looked like this: scattered government control Image
Essentially, any chance at creating a stable country not controlled by the Taliban was lost (let's say squandered) in the first few years following the invasion. This @RANDCorporation report even refers to a "Golden Hour" for nation building success.
rand.org/pubs/research_… Image
After missing that "Golden Hour", the US has since simply been bidding time and postponing the inevitable.
mwi.usma.edu/imperial-polic…
So this is not a "the US broke it, the US owns it" situation.

This is a situation where the US (w/ widespread international support) invaded a broken country, but was distracted at a crucial early moment in the rebuild.

In sum, this tragedy was years in the making.

[END]
Addendum: for those looking for more details on the various Afghan groups fighting in the 1980s Cold War proxy war and 1990s civil war, see this thread 👇
Addendum 2: @SIGARHQ's new Lessons Learned report raises the "Iraq as distraction" angle, but also highlights how Iraq generated the wrong lessons for AFG -- Officials thought some "successes" in Iraq could be "copy and pasted" (sometimes literally) in AFG

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paul Poast

Paul Poast Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfPaulPoast

Apr 21
The House passed a defense supplement for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan.

Ukraine aid was the most controversial portion of the supplement and might cost Speaker Johnson his leadership position.

Why did he do it?

[THREAD] Image
As is being reported, Johnson stated “To put it bluntly, I would rather send bullets to Ukraine than American boys. My son is going to begin in the Naval Academy this fall....This is not a game, this is not a joke.”
cnn.com/2024/04/21/pol…
While it's partly personal for Johnson, his remarks emphasize a larger point, one that I raised in a recent @WPReview column: cutting off US aid won't end the war. Instead, it would embolden Russia.
worldpoliticsreview.com/us-ukraine-aid…
Read 19 tweets
Apr 20
Let's do this.

A close reading of Donald Trump's recent description of the Battle of Gettysburg.

TL, DR: there were no pirates.

[THREAD] Image
ICYMI, here is a clip of what Trump said about the Battle of Gettysburg at his recent Pennsylvania rally

Let's start at the beginning:

"The Union was saved by the immortal heroes at Gettysburg"
Read 30 tweets
Apr 14
Are we on the brink of a larger Middle East War?

The risk increased in the past day, but is still low.

[SHORT THREAD]
Many of the points raised in 👇 🧵 from October still apply: larger wars happen because states want to be drawn in.

Is that still the case?
This @goodauth piece from October made related points about the tools states -- specifically Iran and Israel -- can use to control escalation.

goodauthority.org/news/will-the-…
Read 9 tweets
Apr 13
"International law is fake law."

"The only real law is domestic law."

Both statements are wrong. In some sense, the opposite might be true.

[THREAD] Image
As I wrote recently in @WPReview, international law is flawed. But flawed shouldn't be confused with pointless.

worldpoliticsreview.com/war-gaza-inter…
I emphasized how international law is part of a broader diplomatic process where states try to convey their preferences over policy.

In other words, from signing a treaty to filing a ICJ dispute, international law provides information.

journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117…
Read 20 tweets
Apr 6
To truly understand the current value of NATO, you need to think about a world without NATO.

Such "counterfactual thinking" lies at the heart of policy analysis...and IR scholarship.

[THREAD] Image
This 🧵 builds on my latest @WPReview piece. I argued that NATO is more valuable than ever to its members. But how do we actually know that?

worldpoliticsreview.com/nato-ukraine-r…
The key is to ask, "if NATO wasn't here, what would happen?"
Read 26 tweets
Mar 30
NATO turns 75 years old this coming week.

To mark the event, here are 7 (and a half) historical facts about NATO.

[THREAD] Image
These facts draw from the #NATO7for70 series of 🧵 I wrote during NATO's 70th anniversary (along with *half* a new one). So this is essentially a 🧵 of🧵s.
Fact 1: NATO almost didn't happen. The negotiations were contentious, with France (yep, France) almost scuttling the whole deal. Lot's of contention over the treaty covering Algeria (then part of France) and including Italy.

Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(