Tony Breu Profile picture
Aug 14, 2021 19 tweets 9 min read Read on X
1/16
Why do we use a vaccine (BCG) to treat an unrelated malignancy (bladder cancer)?

Can infections really prevent/treat cancer?

Let's find out.
2/
This story begins in 1813 when Arsène-Hippolyte Vautier reported that patients suffering from gas gangrene experienced a decrease in the size of their malignant tumors.

An explanation (or even the causative bacterium!) wasn't immediately apparent.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28202530/
3/
Decades later, Williams Coley heard about the curious case of a man with inoperable sarcoma that disappeared after erysipelas developed.

The remission was durable out to at least 7 years.

dx.doi.org/10.1097/000006…
4/
After hearing about this case, Coley wondered whether intentional injection of Streptococcus pyogenes might work too.

In 1893 he reported tumor regression in several patients with this therapy.

What was going on?

dx.doi.org/10.1097/000006…
5/
In 1929, Raymond Pearl reported another curious finding.

In an autopsy study, he found a lower frequency of cancer in those with evidence of tuberculosis.

[I'll soon post a historical note on the problems with this study.]

doi.org/10.1093/oxford…
6/
Based on the above, researchers began to study Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG). Old et al found that BCG-infected mice showed increased resistance to tumors.

In one experiment, the 48-day mortality was:
😀0% in BCG infected
🙁92% in uninfected controls

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14428599/
7/
The first trial of BCG in humans wasn't actually for bladder cancer. Instead, it was for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

30 patients with ALL in remission after chemo were treated. Relapse rates were:

😐63% in BCG treated
🙁100% in controls

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4182654/
8/
Although many tumor types appeared to respond to BCG, bladder cancer emerged as the perfect option for this therapy.

Why?

Injecting the attenuated bacteria in the bladder allowed for a more controlled introduction to tumor cells.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17997439/
9/
The promise of BCG therapy in bladder cancer became clear with the results of a small trial by Morales et al.

They treated 9 patients with recurrent non-muscle invasive bladder cancer with BCG and found a 12-fold reduction in recurrence.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/820877/
10/
In subsequent years, BCG has also been compared head-to-head against chemotherapy and proved superior.

The probability of disease-free survival at five years:
😐45% in BCG treated
🙁18% in doxorubicin treated

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1922207/
11/
Overall, meta-analyses have demonstrated the following odds ratios for tumor recurrence:

☞ 0.61 (compared with control)
☞ 0.56 (compared to mitomycin C)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16765182/
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15947584/
12/
What is BCG doing to cause this anti-tumor effect? The short answer, it is:

💥Immunotherapy💥

BCG activates nearly all aspects of the immune system, including both innate and adaptive.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24492433/
13/
While we often equate the immune system with our fight against infectious diseases, it also has a key role in tumor recognition and rejection.

The emergence of checkpoint inhibitors demonstrates well the power of immunotherapy.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28783669/
14/
Another mechanism of benefit with BCG may be Trained Immunity.

This is the concept that innate immune cells (e.g., macrophages) "trained" by one infection (or vaccine) respond with a heightened response to a second, unrelated, infection.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34131332/
15/
Before closing, it's worth mentioning another way immune activation by BCG can benefit.

Reduction in non-TB infections.

For example, a recent RCT reported a decrease in new infections after BCG vaccination:
🙁42% for placebo
🙂25% for BCG

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32941801/
16/16 - SUMMARY
⚡️For centuries bacterial infections have been observed to reduce tumor size
⚡️These observations led to trials of BCG for cancer, including bladder cancer
⚡️BCG acts as a form of immunotherapy, leading to immune destruction of cancer cells

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tony Breu

Tony Breu Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tony_breu

Jun 20
1/11
🤔Why does chronic hepatitis C infection "require" the intermediary of cirrhosis in order to cause hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)?

Chronic hepatitis B can "skip" this step, going directly from chronic infection to HCC.

Why the difference?
2/
To begin, let's look at how frequently HCC occurs in patients without cirrhosis.

A 2019 study of United States (US) medical centers included 5144 patients with HCC.

💡12% had no underlying cirrhosis

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31475372/
3/
A 2022 study found a similar rate, with 13% of patients with HCC showing no evidence of cirrhosis.

When looking more specifically at hepatitis C (HCV) versus hepatitis B (HBV), they found varying rates:

➣ HCV: 6% of patients with HCC were non-cirrhotic
➣ HBV: 19% of patients with HCC were non-cirrhotic

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34027591/Image
Read 11 tweets
Apr 9
1/12 - Mystery #1

You are seeing a patient recently diagnosed with heart failure and started on GDMT. You notice that their hemoglobin (HGB) has increased (12 → 13 g/dL) in the intervening weeks.

🤔Which medication is the likely cause of this increase in HGB?
2/12 - An Answer

Empagliflozin

💡All SGLT2 inhibitors have been associated with an increase in hematocrit/hemoglobin soon after initiation.

The average increase is 2.3% in hematocrit and 0.6 g/dL in hemoglobin.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…Image
3/12 - An Initial Explanation (I)

The effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on HCT/HGB has been noted since the very first randomized control trial of dapagliflozin, published in 2010.

Initially, investigators assumed this was related to the diuretic effect of these drugs (i.e., a reduction in plasma volume led to an increase in HCT/HGB).

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20609968/Image
Read 12 tweets
Feb 22
1/10
🤔Why is pulmonary embolism (PE) relatively rare in those with Factor V Leiden?

This Factor V Leiden Paradox was pointed out to me by @DrSamelsonJones after I posted about a similar difference with Behçet Syndrome.

Let's have a look.
2/
In 1993, Dahlback, Carlsson, and Svensson first described a heritable resistance to activated protein C.

A year later the same group found this to be the most common form of hereditary hypercoagulability.


ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8302317/Image
Image
3/
The mutation in the Factor V gene conferring resistance to activated protein C was detailed the following year by a group in Leiden, The Netherlands.

Thus the name for the condition: Factor V Leiden.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8164741/Image
Read 10 tweets
Feb 18
1/8
🤔Why is pulmonary embolism (PE) so rare in Behçet Syndrome?

The condition is associated with a 14-fold increased risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) but almost none of these result in PE.

What is it about the thrombus in Behçet that makes it so unable to embolize?
2/
Numerous case series have reported a markedly increased risk of deep vein thrombosis with Behçet Syndrome.

One reported the following rates of venous thrombosis:
➣ Behçet Syndrome: 18/73 (25%)
➣ Controls: 4/146 (3%)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11426022/Image
3/
Another study of 882 patients with vascular Behçet Syndrome reported the following rates of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE):

➣ DVT: 592/882 (67%)
➣ PE: 0%!

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24907156/Image
Read 9 tweets
Dec 12, 2023
1/7
🤔What is the hemodynamic response to a chronic hemoglobin of 1.5 g/dL.

A fascinating 1963 study published in @CircAHA provides some interesting answers. Let's have a look at Patient One.

ahajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.116…
Image
@CircAHA 2/
Patient One had chronic anemia with a hemoglobin 1.5 g/dL. You'll see that before receiving blood they had the following cardiac parameter:

• HR 100 (elevated)
• Cardiac index 8.9 (elevated)
• Stroke index 89 (elevated) Image
@CircAHA 3/
After transfusion to a hemoglobin of 10 g/dL, the following changes were noted:

• HR 100 (elevated but unchanged)
• Cardiac index 3.4 (decreased and now normal)
• Stroke index 34 (decreased and now normal)
Image
Image
Read 7 tweets
Dec 10, 2023
1/17
🤔Why don't we transfuse to a normal hemoglobin?

In many cases, we aim to restore values to the normal range. Potassium and other electrolytes. Even white blood cells.

But not hemoglobin.

In most situations, we accept >7g/dL, far less than normal. Why are we so tolerant? Image
2/
The principal rationale for red blood cell transfusion is to increase the O₂-carrying capacity and therefore O₂ delivery to tissues.

As hemoglobin is lowered O₂ delivery decreases, assuming all else remains unchanged.

So giving blood makes sense.
3/
Historically we did not transfuse to normal because we did not transfuse. The risks far outstripped the benefits.

There were also technical constraints and storage limitations. This meant that transfusions were reserved for acute conditions.

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/…
Image
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(