A thread for #RogdAwarenessDay: 1. Three years ago today, August 16, 2018, a scientific journal published Lisa Littman’s study of 256 parental reports of adolescents experiencing a phenomenon described by Littman as 'Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria’ journals.plos.org/plosone/articl…
2.Littman coined the term ROGD to describe the phenomenon of adolescents who having previously had no feelings of gender dysphoria suddenly felt extremely dysphoric and wished to transition.
3.Littman noted that ROGD could perhaps be a maladaptive social coping mechanism for other challenges, and often came about after extensive time spent online. Social contagion also seemed to be a factor
4.Littman’s paper attracted huge hostility from activists who denied the existence of ROGD & cried ‘transphobia’. Two weeks later, PLOS One announced a post-publication review; on the same day, Brown University retracted its promotion of the study retractionwatch.com/2018/08/29/rea…
5.The controversy grew until March 2019 when PLOS One concluded its review and concluded that: ‘Other than the addition of a few missing values in Table 13, the Results section is unchanged in the updated version of the article.’ journals.plos.org/plosone/articl…
7.In June 2020, @AbigailShrier released her book Irreversible Damage based on Littman’s ROGD study. Shrier's book compassionately describes the challenges facing ROGD kids & their families. This too was attacked by activists. Again the truth prevailed
8.Littman's work was a descriptive study and, as Littman noted in her study, ROGD is "not a formal mental health diagnosis at this time". Nonetheless there have been further scurrilous attempts to undermine Littman's and Shrier's work sexologytoday.org/2021/08/caaps-…
9.Since the initial publication, the number of gender-distressed teens has continued to escalate. Organisations who purport to help people with gender-related distress continue to ignore Littman’s study, while teenagers and their families continue to suffer
10.Thousands of @Genspect parents describe how their children match the description of ROGD and yet their voices remain unheard. And so we at Genspect call on CAAPS, WPATH, AAP and others to listen to these loving parents, who just want the best treatment possible for their kids
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵 Puberty blockers are fueling an unprecedented medical experiment on children. Genspect UK's powerful new briefing examines the alarming evidence and detransitioner testimony that challenge the NHS's reckless trial. Thanks to @cwestonclark for leading this critical work.
Our briefing systematically debunks key myths about puberty blockers, including their reversibility, mental health benefits, and supposed suicide prevention effects—all claims contradicted by the Cass Review's findings.
Detransitioners from our @BeyondTransHelp service courageously share their experiences: "It was the worst decision I ever made, and I'm haunted by the lingering side effects every single day." These authentic voices form the heart of our briefing, offering vital perspective.
In the 1860s, German lawyer Karl Heinrich Ulrichs invented the concept of the gender soul to explain his own erotic interest in men. He could never possibly have imagined the far-reaching ramifications of his idea.1/10
Believing his attraction to men was caused by having a female soul in a male body, he wrote, “nature developed the physical male germ in us, yet mentally, the feminine one.” This distinction between the sex of the mind and the sex of the body has endured to the present day. 2/10
Christine Jorgensen’s doctor described a “female personality in a male body,” while Harry Benjamin referred to a “female soul in a male body.” John Money introduced gender to the medical lexicon, and Robert Stoller coined gender identity as one's sense of belonging to a sex. 3/10
In 1931, German physician Felix Abraham wrote the first scientific report on what he referred to as the “genitalumwandlung,” meaning genital transformation, of two “homosexual transvestites.” One of the men in the paper was Dora Richter. 1/9
The report is a detailed description, complete with photos, of the procedure which involved carving a cavity, lining it with skin grafts from the thigh, and inserting a sponge to prevent wound closure. Abraham strangely described it as “very easy” and only taking a short time.2/9
“I just wanted to give a description of the procedure itself, because I believe an infinite number of patients with these same inclinations exist, who desire similar procedures, but do not know of any means and ways to achieve same,” explained Abraham. 3/9
We're pleased that so many news outlets are reporting on the @thecassreview. It makes the #WPATHFiles even more relevant and considerably more damning.
The following thread contains a selection of articles and discussions on the report.
1//
The Times- Nine Key Findings From the Cass Review into gender transition.
A great morning session at @CanSG_org .
Beginning with Keynote speaker Prof. Riittakerttu Kaltiala and moving swiftly through talks by Prof. Michael Biggs, Prof. Susan Bewley, Dr Margaret McCartney, Dr Anna Hutchinson and Prof. Richard Byng.
Some slides from the talks. The recording will be available after the conference.
@CanSG_org The 2nd panel, Chaired by Dr Louise Irvine will cover 'Safeguarding gender-questioning children & young people in healthcare and education'.
It begins with GIDs whistleblower Sonia Appleby.
#FirstDoNoHarm
Sonia Appleby references the seminal report by Robert Francis KC- Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry, as part of her talk on Safeguarding and the role of trusts and boards to be open to hearing the first hand accounts of patients and staff concerns. "Organisations can hit the target, but miss the point" commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief…
“Do we have to stick to penis & vagina norms? Can we have genitalia that looks like flowers or abstract sculpture? Can we have multiple? Can they be interchangeable?” -WPATH certified clinician Laura Jacobs, LCSW- WPATH SOC revision committee.
Credit: posted by @Jonnywsbell
@Jonnywsbell Maybe WPATH’s next “Standards of Care”will have a chapter on “abstract genitals”.
Seem far fetched? Remember, their current “Standards” introduced “eunuchs” who need their testicles removed.
It’s all “medically necessary” & “lifesaving” according to @wpath !