There needs to be a thread on the Afghanistan withdrawal. People who support withdrawal but don't like how it's done have no better option, and it's this attitude that leads to forever war. They expect competence when the entire lesson of the war is the US is not competent! 1/n
Some background: the US as of 2018 could not even secure the two-mile road between the embassy and the airport. They had to travel by helicopter. This is not like Vietnam, where the major cities at least were pacified. 2/n ndisc.nd.edu/assets/320266/…
Any withdrawal was going to end up with a lot of Afghans wanting to leave. Even if the US took 100% of those who helped it, many more would have tried to come. The last days of the regime were going to be ugly, no matter how long you waited or what you planned. 3/n
So the argument has to be the US, who literally can't do anything in Afghanistan in 20 years, was suddenly going to competently run the Kabul airport, which they can't get to but by helicopter, under the most desperate conditions possible. If they only had a few more months 4/n
And all this was before the Afghan government had fallen apart. As soon as withdrawal was certain and US airpower stopped, the Afghan army collapsed. The US was supposed to become super competent in a few months without any partner on the ground. 5/n
Go look at the Afghanistan papers! If the US tried to open a Pizza Hut in Afghanistan, it'd cost billions, they'd spend all their time on women in management, it'd be infested with rats and generals would say it was a 5-Star restaurant the whole time. 6/n
Biden had already delayed withdrawal. The original Trump deal was supposed to have everyone out by May 1. Biden delayed it by months for logistical reasons, arguing the previous administration had no plan. The whole point of the last few months was to prepare. 7/n
Could they have better used those few months? Maybe. But the problem runs deep, it's the US system, which has screwed this up forever, not with the Biden Administration. The Afghan papers cover the Bush and Obama years, read them and say they would've done better. 8/n
It's also important to realize how complaining about conditions for withdrawal is a way for the pro-war crowd to stay forever. Here's Pompeo now saying the Trump deal was "conditions based." People have said this for years. Conditions are never good. 9/n
We cannot do anything well in Afghanistan. Obama surged, violence got worse. Trump increased the bombing campaign and casualties, the Taliban kept gaining.
But then instead of massive incompetence being a reason to leave, it's an excuse to stay. "Give us a few months." 10/n
Throughout the war, generals and the Afghan gov have gone out of their way to make leaving as difficult as possible. It's strategic. Ghani refused to negotiate with the Taliban the whole time. According to the WSJ, the Afghans refused to believe the US was leaving and adjust 11/n
Here's a previous thread on how Obama was manipulated by generals, who were largely responsible for the surge in his first administration. The memoirs of officials show them very bitter about this. 12/n
When Trump came into office, the generals did a victory lap because they not only got him to surge, he didn't even set a date for withdrawal like Obama did (of course, Obama ended up finding it too hard to leave anyway so it didn't matter). 13/n
After Trump's Taliban deal, they were hard at work sabotaging him. This meant contradicting the administration in public, leaking unflattering stories to the press, etc. This is the strategy that has worked for 20 years. Were they suddenly going to cooperate with Biden? 14/n
There's nothing new about the arguments made by the pro-war crowd or their tactics, the only thing changing was conditions kept getting worse, which was a further excuse to stay.
As ugly as it looks, an administration finally ended the cycle of failure and lies. 15/n
Biden now says the Afghan government would not negotiate with the Taliban in July, stood in the way of organizing flights before the government fell because they did not want to trigger a crisis of confidence. Basically, they needed to collapse before anything could begin. 16/n
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Just now reading No Good Men Among the Living by Anand Gopal. You know about American incompetence in Afghanistan, but Gopal is unique in showing how the occupation looked on the ground, and destroys the narrative of a well-meaning America just being too ambitious. Thread.
In one Afghan district, there was a dispute over which side was the legitimate government. Both sides were accused of being Taliban by their enemies. What did the US do? It went and killed both sides, tortured the survivors, and then awarded medals to the troops involved.
A warlord built a business empire off the occupation, selling the US land he stole from locals, getting the US to take out his rivals by accusing them of being Taliban. The US military dropped fliers that said Afghans who cooperated could “Get Wealth and Power Beyond Your Dreams"
"In the next few years, two women will earn a college degree for every man, if the trend continues,
And almost all the most successful self-made entrepreneurs will still be men, and we'll still hear about how it's due to sexism and the old boy network. wsj.com/articles/colle…
Earning $500 a week and investing it in cryptocurrency seems better than going to college, if you’d spent the last few years doing that instead of going to school you’d be doing pretty well.
“Young women appear eager to take leadership roles, making up 59% of student body presidents in the 2019-20 academic year and 74% of student body vice presidents.” Almost as if modern universities encourage female ambition and discourage it for men.
Do people find this plausible? Because I’ve never known anything about car seat laws in my locality, and didn’t think anyone else did. I also didn’t think anyone put kids in car seats after 5 or so. But I grew up in the 1990s, and know many things have gotten stupider since.
I buy the idea that people have fewer kids now because they’re neurotic loons, but still don’t buy that differences across specific localities matter much. Even though I’d want to believe this study as anti-safetyism propaganda.
Must read on the Afghanistan war. A village was terrorized by a warlord and militias. The Taliban brought peace, and the US brought them back. When there was no more Taliban in the area, the US paid the militia to round up random people. newyorker.com/magazine/2021/…
The 93rd division, US allies, would accuse people in the Karzai government of being Taliban. The US would then send them to Gitmo, along with a random gov official who showed up without a translator. Dado, the warlord, killed US soldiers and then blamed "Taliban."
Afghan gov tried to disband the 93rd division, and replace them with police. The division in response became a subsidiary of a Texas defense contractor, and went and killed 15 Afghan police to get their contract back. Members of the militia who had a conscience joined the Taliban
I'm quoted in The Washington Post, talking about the ways in which the media overlies on generals and the government officials to explain what has been happening in Afghanistan, and the deference they're given. washingtonpost.com/media/2021/09/…
TV appearances recently
McMaster-7
McCaffrey-13
Petraeus-6
Keane-16
Lute-5
Bolton-at least 2
With almost no questioning of their records. Each of these people has been spectacularly wrong at one point or another, and in some cases have conflicts of interest too.
More great reporting from The Post. "The eight generals who commanded American forces in Afghanistan between 2008 and 2018 have gone on to serve on more than 20 corporate boards, according to a review of company disclosures and other releases." washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/…
I don't think the problem with elites is that they moved away from poor whites, that's inevitable in a free society. It's that they built an ideology in which they are the Great Satan. Elites don't think they did that, but they were unconcerned with even the optics of the thing.
If you used "black male" as an insult, or even showed yourself to be ok with people who do, black people would hate you, no matter what else you say or do.
Why do liberals think they can do it with "white males" and not have a bitter culture war?
Fair enough, birtherism was stupid and ugly, the people themselves aren’t blameless and Republican elites have certainly failed terribly. You don’t get a culture this broken without a lot going wrong.