Very happy that me and @lastpositivist's paper, "Risk Aversion and Elite-Group Ignorance", has been accepted at PPR. Here's a link to a preprint, and a brief thread: davidbkinney.com/Risk_Aversion_… 1/8
In his 2007 paper "White Ignorance" Charles Mills famously diagnoses a problem in the epistemic lives of many white agents, primarily in the US: they are ignorant of their relative privilege within racist social structures, and this ignorance is caused by those structures. 2/8
One can understand this as part of a more general pattern of what we call "elite-group ignorance": agents are ignorant of some group-based privilege that they hold, because of that group-based privilege. 3/8
We show that on Lara Buchak's influential axiomatization of risk-averse decision theory, this kind of ignorance can be rational, provided that an agent has a seemingly benign level of risk aversion. 4/8
We take this to have an important political upshot, namely that purely psychological interventions (diversity and inclusion trainings, etc.), may not succeed in eliminating elite-group ignorance, since said ignorance may be caused by something as deep-seeded as risk aversion. 5/8
So it may be little use getting privileged agents to "wake up" to their privilege and do something about it. Instead, it may be far more effective to intervene directly on material inequalities through the redistribution of resources. 6/8
The paper sits somewhere between mathematical philosophy, political philosophy, cog sci, and social science. I want to do more work like this. I can't stress how much I learned from collaborating with Liam. 7/8
Many people to thank for comments on drafts, but of those on twitter I believe it's just @kevin_dorst and @thyacinth. Thank you! 8/8.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Kinney

David Kinney Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @davidbkinney

21 Dec 20
Happy to have just learned that my paper, "Blocking an Argument for Emergent Chance", has been accepted for publication in Journal of Philosophical Logic. Here's a pre-print, followed by a short thread on it: davidbkinney.com/Blocking_an_Ar…. 1/8
For a long time now, philosophers of science, metaphysicians, and epistemologists have been interested in the conditions under which a probability distribution represents "objective chances", or uncertainties that are observer-independent. 2/8
The exemplars are the probabilities used in fundamental physics (e.g., quantum mechanics), but there's also some debate over whether the probabilities used in "special" sciences like biology, econ, etc. can be objective chances, i.e. whether there are "emergent" chances. 3/8
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(