The same article refers to Jenin's "heroic resistance" and hails how the city "continues to confront the occupation and storm it with bullets."
Here are some more pictures of the "martyrs."
And another...
One more:
But Quds News isn't telling its readers that Hamas has admitted the four took part in "heroic armed clashes", nor the fact that it described their city as "storming [Israel] with bullets".
And it certainly isn't showing any of those pictures.
This is important because Quds News is seen by leading anti-Israel smear activists such as Ali Abunimah of the Electronic Intifada.
Abunimah shared the Quds News tweet not once, but twice.
It's also been shared by academics and policy analysts influential in anti-Israel circles, such as Dr. Yara Hawari, of Al-Shabaka.
And here's another academic, this time in America, Shabana Mir.
So the half-truth has gone from Hamas-affiliated media outlet to anti-Israel activists, Palestinian academics and now to Muslim American academics.
This is how the Hamas narrative reaches American audiences.
Update: And this video of one of the four also came to light yesterday.
1/ 🧵
The media’s takeaway from Tucker Carlson’s interview with Ambassador @GovMikeHuckabee?
A distorted headline about Israel “taking over the Middle East.”
That wasn’t the story...
The story was Tucker Carlson self-immolating for over two hours.
Watch the clip.
Then let’s talk about what the press ignored – the lies, the ignorance, the conspiracy-baiting, and the theological incoherence.
Buckle up.
2/ Carlson invokes God’s promise to Abraham – from the “River Nile to the Euphrates” – and suggests this means modern Israel intends to conquer the entire Middle East.
This is theological illiteracy dressed up as geopolitical analysis.
Biblical language ≠ modern expansion policy.
And no serious Israeli government has ever articulated a plan to annex the Middle East based on Genesis.
Reducing ancient covenantal language to a cartoonish land-grab narrative is not journalism.
It’s bait.
3/ Now the lies.
Carlson again implied he was “detained” at Ben Gurion Airport, held for hours, and rushed out because Israel was unsafe, supposedly after Netanyahu called him a “Nazi.”
Except:
• Netanyahu did not call Tucker Carlson a Nazi.
• There is no record of Netanyahu doing so.
• Footage exists of Carlson smiling, hugging staff, and posing in the VIP lounge.
1/10 🧵
Did you know the recent Israel-NGO framework story is being covered very differently depending on the outlet?
Most headlines focus on "restrictions" and "limits on criticism."
But what's the actual policy trying to achieve – and why do some groups comply while others don't? Let's break down the facts calmly.
2/10
In late 2025, Israel rolled out a new registration/vetting system for humanitarian orgs in Gaza & West Bank.
Goal (per official statements): Prevent wartime infiltration by militants into aid groups.
Most organizations signed on quickly. A smaller number raised concerns.
Question: What would you consider reasonable safeguards in active conflict zones?
3/10
Israel reports ~85%+ compliance rate – meaning the vast majority of NGOs met the criteria without issue.
The rules target specific red flags like:
- Documented support for armed groups
- Denial of documented atrocities (e.g., Oct 7)
- Active promotion of boycotts/lawfare against Israel
- Coordination with designated enemy orgs
Not blanket "no criticism" – but focused security checks.