@MaximeBernier is the second politician to EVER earn my admiration.. bigly.
He's willing to address issues nobody else will approach (eg. Globalist enterprise, climate alarmism, open borders, medical facism, irreversible hormone treatment in minors).
Max was undermined by Scheer and the dairy cartel.
He was smeared by Warren Kinsella's Project Cactus.
He was arrested for public speaking the day of the G7 summit.
He's been singled out by "paytriot" Chris (Saccoccia) Sky.
Open your eyes. This man is clearly over the target.
Now, the other choice(s).
Trudeau: Enough said.
O'Toole: Trudeau Lite™ (has already capitulated to globalists).
Singh: Correlates medical autonomy with "right-wing extremism."
Paul: Green Party is for those lacking conviction whose friends guilt-tripped them into voting.
Here's the reality of our choices:
There is the Uniparty, and there is the PPC.
I entered the world of politics to combat the New World Order, not to become some partisan hack.
If you think O'Toole's "Build Back Stronger" beats Trudeau's "Build Back Better," you are an O'Fool.
Next the rebuttals.
"BuT MaX DoESn'T EveN hAve A SeAt!"
Not gonna lie - as somebody new to politics who's voting based on principle and not brand loyalty, I have NO idea what this even means, but it sounds arbitrarily bureaucratic.
I have extra chairs lying around if he needs.
"DON'T SPLIT THE VOTE!"
a) I've never voted.
b) If I had, I'd have been registered liberal.
c) LPC + CPC = Uniparty
Gosh, how else can I phrase this?
Even if Trudeau and O'Toole tied, and my single vote determined the outcome of the entire election, I would STILL vote for Max.
Even IF O'Toole won a majority (he won't) you'd soon be kicking yourselves as he adopted Trudeau's agenda and led Canadians down the same road.
Ask the Democrats how spite-voting worked out for them.
Vote FOR, not AGAINST.
"It's all rigged anyway... why bother?"
You're damn right it's rigged!
It's always been rigged!
Canada INVENTED Dominion voting software!
They have the reporters and pollsters in their pockets!
They plan to tabulate mail-in ballots post-election!
But here's a history lesson...
... In 2016, Hillary was supposed to win. The deck was stacked in her favor, but a businessman entered the scene and won the hearts of the American people, and with grassroots energy, they shattered the rigged algorithms.
In Canada, our grassroots, anti-globalist party is PPC.
But I digress- this election isn't about victory (at least not for me). Its about unity. Lines in the sand. A show of numbers.
As somebody who spent 15 years not exercising his right to vote, beleive me when I say the enemy LITERALLY counts on your jaded indifference.
"United Non-Compliance is the ONLY way!"
Sorry, but I wholeheartedly disagree.
Saying this is like baking a cake using ONLY eggs because they're a crucial ingredient.
There's more to a revolution than sitting on the ground and yelling "I don't wanna!" at the tyrants.
There needs to be coordination and legislation. Leadership through transparency and proper representation.
UNC makes for wholesome viral videos, but it doesn't stop the police in France from visiting restaurant tables and checking for health passes after the crowds clear.
No other rebuttals come to mind, as most other arguments I've heard against Maxime Bernier / the PPC prove to be fabricated, embellished, disinformed or outdated.
Those of us who beleive the "Plandemic" is a global conspiracy base our thinking off of several legitimate factors:
i) All of these "health and safety" measures appear to trickle down from unelected, postnationalist policymakers in the UN/WHO/WEF/Bilderberg.
ii) The scientific and health community is historically susceptible to being bought by vested interests (eg. Monsanto, asbestos manufacturers, Big Sugar, Big Tobacco)
iii) The PCR test (which has NO way of accurately isolating the virus) is upstream of all closures and mandates.
iv) Masks, social distancing and lockdowns are demonstrably ineffective, so by process of elimination, the only purpose of their continuation must be control.
v) Mass destruction to mental health and the economy could have been avoided by isolating only those who were at risk.
.. that being said, a lot of people seem confused about how to use it, and I’ve had some really interesting experiences toying with it so far.
I’m positive its potential is way over my head, but I thought I’d share my approach
ii. For 3 reasons, I won’t get into the purported origins/function of Gematria:
1) There are already loads of articles/videos explaining that
2) Anything so old loses clarity over time
3) I wouldn’t tell you how to play basketball by describing rubber, or who invented the game
iii. This is my interpretation:
In the same way we designate frequencies to the color spectrum or musical scale, Gematria applies mathematical values to the phonetic sounds of human speech.
We must assume that all languages are, in fact, mathematically resonant in their nature.