I'd like to preface what I'm about to say by noting that I'm not unsympathetic to those who fought with us and were left out in the cold by their own countrymen.

I'd like Biden pursue all reasonable measures to rescue as many of those folks as possible.

That said...
The MSM can seriously go fuck itself right now. You want to know how we get stuck in places like Afghanistan for 20 years? You want to know why we never leave? Pick up a newspaper and read how national security conflicts are covered.
And the power to shape how we engage in foreign policy, particularly when the use of military force is on the table, is something emedia institutions cherish.

Three Presidents in a row operating as though they were actually elected to conduct FP has broken these people.
People dragged Tom Nichols but he's the most honest of the lot of them. He's not using Biden as an avatar for the public and the pretext of *execution* as an excuse to tell us we're wrong. He's just telling us we're wrong.
I didn't expect a lot of introspection as to why there's this divide between the MSM and the public, or reflection as to whether we have civilian control over the military for a reason, but the contrast with all the quiet Trump voter pieces is something.
Last night, @ErinBurnett deliberately showed the footage of the Afghans falling off the twice. Before the 2nd time she told her audience she was doing it b/c *it's the type of image that sticks with you.* It was offensive.
I'm not a Fox simp and that shit isn't covering the news.
Anyway, the MSM would do well to consider whether it's worth further damaging its own credibility this way with voters capable of critical thought, we still remember the lead up to Iraq assholes, or whether they might want save it for another time.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with CavsKermit

CavsKermit Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JbkJbk1234

22 Aug
Personally, I think if someone is trotting out the old America's *standing* or *leadership* within the global community trope, that should be viewed as a tacit admission that they don't have good strategic arguments for staying.

But if we're going to place value on precedent...
Then we should look to the otherside of that coin.

1) What does it say if the American people want to end a foreign occupation, elect not one, but three successive Presidents to do that, and it still doesn't happen?
What incentives arise within our own military, IC, and private contractors when none of time, treasure, nor success of the mission are relevant factors because public support has been decoupled from their ability to continue?
Read 7 tweets
17 Aug
Our plan was to leave, the Afghan government's plan was to continue to be corrupt, and the Afghan security forces' plan was to surrender rather than fight in the face of that corruption.
And there's just no way around the latter two problems which is why all of these op-eds, every single one of them, simply decide to disappear them.
I want to see the op-ed that offers a solution to the problem of the Afghan security forces preferring to surrender to the Taliban rather than fight for a government as corrupt as the last one.
Read 4 tweets
16 Aug
If you're of the opinion that the U.S. should've kept troops in a half a dozen forward positions to stave off collapse, and had half a dozen extraction points, you should say that.

You should also be clear about the risks that would present to our troops.
There are no free rides here, and once the Afghan security forces called it quits, there were no good options.
We should've evacuated our allies ahead of troops? Perhaps, but then you just took out a giant ad saying we have zero faith in the Afghan security forces to protect their countrymen.

We could've been watching this play out in May only our troops would've still been exposed.
Read 5 tweets
15 Aug
The Taliban did not win a bunch of battles. Despite having more troops and better weapons, the Afghan security forces simply abandoned their posts.
And with respect to this, I want to evacuate as man allies as possible, there's a hard limit on how many more U.S. troops I'm willing to risk to do so. In addition to failures that include many agencies through 4 administrations, I'm angry with actors outside the U.S.
Start with blatantly corrupt Afghan officials. Guess what, your actions have consequences for your citizens. The Afghan force who took a paycheck for decades and bolted the moment shit got real, same.
Read 5 tweets
31 Dec 20
This paragraph, on the other hand, underscores the problem.
You're not going to be able to thread the needle here. The pundits the cray segment of the base are listening to have more credibility with them than you. Sometimes when people are talking crazy, the best prescription is to tell them, flatly, that's crazy talk.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(