To all the non-Western countries who are welfare recipients of Western aid, including larger states like Pakistan:

Do you literally feel no shame?
One of the most fundamental pillars of international politics is the Golden Rule.

No, not treat others the way you want to be treated, I’m talking about the real Golden Rule: He who has the most gold, rules.
This thought was prompted by reading all these pieces on how all these countries are just propped up by Western aid and support. Artificial countries.

Afghanistan is the least of this sorry league.
Granted, much Western aid is out of self-interest, namely to prevent refugee flows, but still.

Speaking honestly, the economies and societies of the Global South, other than China, are screwed. Economic growth tapered off even before Covid started, back in 2013-14.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tacos and Airplanes

Tacos and Airplanes Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @blob_watcher

20 Aug
She’s replying to a news story about China, but honestly, I hope you can see why the US spent so much time promoting women’s rights and new gender identities to Afghans: there is a huge Western elite constituency that demands the normalization of these New Age type ideologies.
She seems to be saying that Xi Jinping should be a Western liberal and encourage the boy to instead wear dresses and be a girl. And the girl should be lesbian.
I was a strong supporter of gay rights and marriage beginning all the way back in the early/mid 2000’s when it was somewhat unpopular to do so, but honestly, the sanctification of non-trad life by the New Age Western world is so cringe.
Read 5 tweets
19 Aug
Pretty obvious that Biden misspoke.

This goes to my point the other day about how PRC diplomats understand US foreign policy better than USG officials themselves, who stutter and babble when asked to explain a specific policy, especially as it relates to TW.
The fact that OP and the commentators in the comments and retweets are taking this seriously just shows you how little even Americans understand their own nation's political processes and dynamics.

No wonder they get surprised so often.
The USG just clarified. I was right.

I should honestly charge for my sage analysis. A one man political consultancy.

reuters.com/world/asia-pac…
Read 4 tweets
19 Aug
By @nise_yoshimi. What a 🔥 summary of modern Anglo capitalism.

So much of the US' modern politics and problems, both domestic and foreign, are downstream of its reliance on finance and immigration to fuel the capitalist beast at home, and dominate and subvert the world abroad.
I think there is a direct line the from post-1965 INA to modern US identity controversies (eg wokeness).

The US was almost 90% white as late as the ‘70s, with blacks as the US’ literal only minority.
Non-Western migrants were essentially non-existent until 1965, small sprinklings of say, Mexicans or Japanese aside.

And the US essentially had no large scale inward immigration for large parts of its history like 1925-1965.
Read 13 tweets
19 Aug
On 9/21/01, Afghan senior clerics recommended to the Afghan Taliban government under Mohammed Omar, that they should tell UBL to leave Afghanistan for his role in planning 9/11.

They offered condolences, too, for the victims of 9/11.

nytimes.com/2001/09/21/wor…
The Taliban government ignored the advice and played dumb, beating around the bush and refusing to hand UBL over immediately to the US.

The rest, as the saying goes, is history.
This is the first time I’m learning about this.

I think contrition and a handover of UBL by the Taliban, if they had chosen to give it, would still not have been enough to satisfy America’s desire for revenge.
Read 4 tweets
18 Aug
Now that I think about it, I think Bill Bishop’s Sinocism newsletter has done real damage towards the goal of understanding China in the Xi era.

Telling everyone that he was a hardcore communist misled people to thinking he was an actual economic communist.
Moreover, the constant re-statements of ‘totalitarian Xi, liberal Hu’ dichotomy do not track with reality on the ground, public sentiment, or socioeconomic indicators, which are better now in the Xi era due to additional economic growth over the Hu era.
In short, I think he overemphasized what a break the Xi era has been from its predecessors.

Just a reminder to not take someone at face value just because they have a distinguished brand.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(