The difference between hedging bets and hedging the landscape, as some have heard me discuss it.
Another way to say this: what we call transition risks will restock themselves as we move forward—institutions will find themselves facing wave after wave of risk, while lugging behind them sunk-cost investments, outdated expertise, shellshocked stakeholders and technical debt.
Other than that, it's probably fine...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Scientists have known for decades that burning fossil fuels are heating up the planet, and that more intense heat waves are one of the clearest manifestations of life on a superheated planet. And..."
On COVID, Afghanistan or domestic terror, sure, but on climate chaos, ecological destabilization, supply chain breaks, mass-migration, failed disaster states, sudden economic realignments and all the other mechanisms of discontinuity in the planetary crisis, too.
OODA sheer is happening not only around responses to fast-moving crises, but also in regards to the rapidly-evolving strategic environment for solutions/action.
What used to be expert thinking about sustainability, decarbonization, etc is now outdated.
Just your reminder that a—arguably *the*— pivotal character is DUNE is Liet Kynes, the planetary ecologist.
He is one of the main engines behind all that happens.
"Growth is limited by that necessity which is present in the least amount..."
Image by Moebius/Jodorowsky
"The highest function of ecology is understanding consequences."
Image: Max von Sydow, 1984 film
To me, there is a sort of grizzled old man wisdom at the very core of Kynes' vision.
It seems to me a strange choice of character to gender swap. But every adaptation is a new story, Villeneuve is a genius and Sharon Duncan-Brewster may do something new & amazing with the role.