Justice Kairu on #BBIRulling 1. Is the basic structure doctrine applicable in Kenya?
Answer:Yes it is.
Appeal on that ground dismissed. More grounds to be covered. #BBIAppeal
2.
Justice Kairu also says that there are no eternity clauses in the constitution #BBIAppealJudgement
On whether the President can promote the BBI Amendment process, Justice Kairu says "There is no explicit bar on who can promote a popular amendment, even a President can" #BBIRulling#BBIJudgment
Justice Kairu says that The President was not acting in his private capacity as a citizen in leading the amendment process, he was acting in his public capacity as a public officer #BBIAppealJudgement
Further, per Justice Kairu, public awareness, public participation and civic education was not done in the BBI Process #BBIAppealJudgement#BBIAppeal
On verification of signatures, Justice Kairu says that the time provided for scrutiny (3 days) was "grossly insufficient" and that a comprehensive framework is needed to guide the verification process in future. #BBIAppeal
Justice Kairu agrees with Justice Fatuma Sichale that even without a legal framework to guide a referendum, that cannot stop the IEBC from carrying out a referendum #BBIRulling#BBIAppealJudgement
On IEBC quorum, Justice Kairu states that the IEBC had no quorum and that the Appeal of the High Court decision on that question fails. #BBIRulling#BBIAppealJudgement
Should the referendum be on one question or multiple questions?
Justice Kairu says that a draft bill with numerous amendments to the constitution cannot be what was intended. The amendment should deal with one question at a time. #BBIAppealJudgement
Justice Kairu also holds that there is no evidence the President was served with the pleadings but that he can be sued in his personal capacity.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Your SACCO dividends are likely to take a big hit with recent changes in the law. Under the Sacco Societies(Non-Deposit Taking Business) Regulations, 2020, sweeping changes are set to affect how saccos run and operate.
Dividend payout is likely to be reduced, why? 👇
The Regulations require saccos to increase their capital base, and maintain a core capital of 5 million. The minimum capital shall also not be less than 8% of the total assets. Saccos which want to increase their capital base will likely deny members dividends.
It is also expected that the Saccos will retain their earnings to meet the requirements under the regulations.
Currently, saccos issue their surplus funds as dividends to members. Now, they will inject that surplus into their core capital.
Jane Muthoni has been sentenced to 30 years in prison for the offence of Murder.
So what does Senior Counsel Fred Ngatia have to do with her sentence and why should she be grateful to Francis Karioko and @katibainstitute?
This is why 👇
Francis Karioko Muruatetu was accused of murder together with Wilson Thirimbu. They had killed Mr. Lawrence Githinji in February 2000. Murder is an offence under section 204 of the penal code and the sentence once found guilty, was DEATH! So what led to the guilty verdict?
Muruatetu and Wilson in their plan to murder Lawrence posed as land buyers. Together with his driver, he took the two to the said piece of land. Muruatetu and Wilson had barbed wire, iron bars and a machete which they indicated would be used to fence the property.
In 2005, an old man with the help of his walking stick walked into Nairobi Market's Barclays Bank with a bag full of cash, probably millions. He was all alone and it was end month. He probably had cash collected from his many rentals.
That man was Gerishon Kamau Kirima
Welcome to #LawSchoolKe as we tall about death with and without wills and the trouble that follows. Basically, succession planning
If the case of the late Kirima was a road, it would be a winding road that never seems to have an end in sight. So much so that Jutsice Lenaola when asked to decide on an issue touching on a company by the name Kirima and Sons, he restrained himself by stating that
I have seen reports in the newspapers about a frothing battle between Ken Okoth's relatives and Luo traditions and his preference for Cremation.
Now,I don't know much about Hon. Ken's wishes but I would like to educate us a little on disputes involving burial.
First,we have to thank the Luo Nation for its role in ensuring that we get very good jurisprudence on this very delicate area. Our story begins in 1986 in the famous case known by every law student, CIVIL APPEAL No. 31 of 1987 popularly known as SM Otieno Case
For a start,Kenya does not have any legislation dealing with where, who, how to bury a dead person. The laws only stop at the treatment of a dead body.