A short thread on cases and positivity across the UK.
TL;DR Cases and positivity look to be on the rise across the UK (with the possible exception of Northern Ireland) but the picture is mixed.
The rises are not ubiquitous across all nations, regions and local authorities.
1/9
Cases seem to be rising across all four nations of the UK, after each nation saw a dip in July.
These rises probably correspond to the easing of restrictions and should be placed in context of schools still being off (Scotland saw schools return this week). 2/9
The picture is reflected in positivity. Positivity in all Nations is rising again, apart from Northern Ireland, which has continued to see positivity rates falls. 3/9
At a regional level in England we have seen up-ticks in cases in all regions although they seem to be flattening a little.
Some regions are seeing small falls in cases. 4/9
These are easier to see in this plot (orange this week vs grey last week - green diamonds are September 1st levels).
Rises in cases can be seen in all regions except, London and Yorkshire and the Humber, but the West Midlands saw big rises.
It's a mixed picture across England.
5
Its the same story for positivity where, after all (regions) initially up-ticking in early August, London and the NE saw small falls, but every other region in England continued to see rises in positivity. 6/9
At the level of Local Authorities (LAs) 178 ( 57%) English LTLAs saw increases and all are above last September 1st 2020 levels (green diamonds). 7/9
24 out of 32 Scottish LAs saw increased positivity rates.
21 out of 22 Welsh LAs saw increased positivity rates.
All Northern Irish LAs saw decreased positivity rates decrease. 8/9
Summary.
Cases and positivity look to be on the rise across the UK (with the possible exception of Northern Ireland) although more slowly than before the mid-July dips.
In context, this is with schools off, so we might expect cases/+ity to rise more quickly when schools go back.
Caveat: remember these data are now about a week old and reflect transmission even earlier.
With thanks, as ever to Bob Hawkins for his help preparing the data.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Science is under siege. Political forces are undermining expertise, dismantling research institutions, and replacing evidence based policymaking with ideology.
This is a global crisis.
🧵
1/31
The covid-19 pandemic underscored the importance of scientific independence.
While vaccines, diagnostics, and therapeutics saved many lives, governments that ignored expert advice and downplayed the threat allowed lives to be lost.
2/31
Sometimes, it became a political battleground as public health experts were vilified and disinformation flourished, with deadly consequences.
3/31 bmj.com/content/379/bm…
Today the Royal Society will meet to discuss “Fellows’ behaviour”. Without doubt the fellow they will primarily be discussing is Elon Musk.
The behaviour may range from his public dissemination of unfounded conspiracy theories to his attacks on the science
🧵
1/38
Musk is also an important figure (some would argue the most important) within a US administration that is laying siege to science and to scientific inquiry itself.
2/38 researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-world-…
The new administration’s executive orders have restricted research, silenced climate scientists and cut funding, as part of a systematic targeting of the scientific community.
3/38
Here's what I think we should be doing to ensure that the UK (and indeed other non-US countries) does not suffer the same fate.
🧵
1/37
The United States is currently witnessing an unprecedented assault on its scientists and scientific institutions, driven by populist agendas that prioritise ideology over evidence.
These orchestrated attacks threaten the foundations...
Silence will not shield scientists from the consequences of an increasingly hostile political landscape.
UK and other non-US scientists must act to support our US colleagues.
Here's what I think we should be doing...
🧵
1/35
Science thrives on collaboration and openness.
The people who practice science are committed to seeking truth and combatting falsehoods.
2/35
In an era where political forces increasingly seek to distort, suppress, or co-opt scientific knowledge for ideological purposes, the global scientific community must recognise that staying silent in the face of these challenges is no longer an option.
Fiona Fox’s recent article in Research Professional News cautions that expelling Elon Musk from the Royal Society could undermine public trust in science.
I disagree...
🧵
1/25 researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-uk-vie…
I think that this perspective overlooks the critical role that scientific institutions play in upholding ethical standards and defending the integrity of science, especially at times when science and scientists are subject to threats and intimidation from political institutions
2
It's imperative that scientists and their representative bodies actively engage in political discourse to protect scientific integrity, particularly when it is under direct threat, as has been clearly evidenced by recent developments in the United States
3 iflscience.com/us-science-is-…
After hearing some underwhelming testimony last month at the #COVIDInquiry on the use of respirators, @trishgreenhalgh and I decided to write a rapid response to the @bmj_latest to set the record straight.
Here's what we wrote...
1/15 bmj.com/content/386/bm…
"Respirators outperform surgical masks; fit-testing is desirable but not essential"
Professor Susan Hopkins (UK Covid Inquiry, 18th September 2024) claimed that evidence for the superiority of respirators (which are made to an industry standard and designed to fit ...
2/15
closely around the face) over medical facemasks (which are not generally made to any quality standard and often fit loosely, leaving gaps around the sides) is “weak”.
She also claimed that respirators are of little use if they are not fit-tested.
3/15 bmj.com/content/386/bm…